Skip to main content

Multi-Agent Social Simulation

  • Chapter
  • 2999 Accesses

Abstract

While ambient intelligence and smart environments (AISE) technologies are expected to provide large impacts to human lives and social activities, it is generally difficult to show utilities and effects of these technologies on societies. AISE technologies are not only methods to improve performance and functionality of existing services in the society, but also frameworks to introduce new systems and services to the society. For example, no one expected beforehand what Internet or mobile phone brought into out social activities and services, although they changes our social system and patterns of behaviors drastically and emerge new services (and risks, unfortunately). The main reason of this difficulty is that actual effects of IT systems appear when enough number of people in the society use the technologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abowd GD, Battestini A, Connell TO (2003) Fhe location service: A framework for handling multiple location sensing technologies. Tech. rep., Georgia Institute for Technology, technical Report GIT-GVU-03-07

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bandara U, Minami M, Hasegawa M, Inoue M, Morikawa H, Aaoyama T (2004) Design and implementation of an integrated contextual data management platform for context-aware applications. In: Seventh International Symposium on Wireless Personal Multimedia Communications (WPMC ’04), pp 266–270

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bishop R (2005) Intelligent Vehicle Technology and Trends. Artech House

    Google Scholar 

  4. Casti JL (1997) Would-be Worlds: how simulation is changing the frontiers of science. John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dresner K, Stone P (2007) Learning policy selection for autonomous intersection management. In: AAMAS 2007 Workshop on Adaptive and Learning Agents, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, pp 34–39

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dresner K, Stone P (2008) Mitigating catastrophic failure at intersections of autonomous vehicles. In: ATT08, Estoril, Portugal, pp 78–85

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dresner K, Stone P (2008) A multiagent approach to autonomous intersection management. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 31:591–656

    Google Scholar 

  8. Noda I (2004) Usability of dial-a-ride systems. In: Proc. of International Workshop on Massively Multi-Agent Systems, pp 77–90

    Google Scholar 

  9. Noda I, Frank I (1999) Investigating the complex with virtual soccer. In: Heudin JC (ed) Virtual Worlds : Synthetic Universes, Digital Life, and Complexity, Perseus Books, pp 189–209

    Google Scholar 

  10. Noda I, Ohta M, Kumada Y, Nakashima H (2005) Usability of dial-a-ride systems. In: Proc. of AAMAS-2005, pp (p–726)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Noda I, Shinoda K, Ohta M, Nakashima H (2007) Evaluation of bus transportation system in urban area using computer simulation. In: Proc. of APCOM’07-EPMESC XI, pp MS24–4–1

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pomerleau DA (1993) Neural Network Perception for Mobile Robot Guidance. Kluwer Academic Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  13. Reynolds CW (1999) Steering behaviors for autonomous characters. In: Proceedings of the Game Developers Conference, pp 763–782

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rogers S, Flechter CN, Langley P (1999) An adaptive nteractive agent for route advice. In: Etzioni O, Müller JP, Bradshaw JM (eds) Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Autonomous Agents (Agents’99), ACM Press, Seattle, WA, USA, pp 198–205, URL citeseer.nj.nec.com/rogers95adaptive.html

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Sashima A, Izumi N, Kurumatani K (2004) Consorts: A multiagent architecture or service coordination in ubiquitous computing. In: Multiagent for Mass User Support, Springer Verlag (LNAI-3012), pp 196–216

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schonberg T, Ojala M, Suomela J, Torpo A, Halme A (1995) ositioning an autonomous off-road vehicle by using fused DGPS and inertial navigation. In: 2nd IFAC Conference on Intelligent Autonomous Vehicles, pp 226–231, URL citeseer.nj.nec.com/55688.html

  17. VanMiddlesworth M, Dresner K, Stone P (2008) Replacing the stop sign: Unmanaged intersection control for autonomous vehicles. In: ATT08, Estoril, Portugal, pp 94–101

    Google Scholar 

  18. Weiser M (1991) The computer for the twenty-first century. Scientific American 265:94–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wierwille WW, Hanowski RJ, Hankey JM, Kieliszewski CA, Lee SE, Medina A, Keisler AS, Dingus TA (2002) Identification and evaluation of driver errors: Overview and recommendations. Tech. Rep. FHWA-RD-02-003, Virginia Tech Transportation Institute, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA, sponsored by the Federal Highway Administration

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Noda, I., Stone, P., Yamashita, T., Kurumatani, K. (2010). Multi-Agent Social Simulation. In: Nakashima, H., Aghajan, H., Augusto, J.C. (eds) Handbook of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-93808-0_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-93808-0_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-93807-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-93808-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics