Skip to main content

Model-based Planning in Physical domains using SetGraphs

  • Conference paper
Book cover Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XX (SGAI 2003)

Abstract

This paper proposes a non-propositional representation framework for planning in physical domains. Physical planning problems involve identifying a correct sequence (plan) of object manipulations, transformations and spatial rearrangements to achieve an assigned goal . The problem of the ramification of action effects causes most current (propositional) planning languages to have inefficient encodings of physical domains. A simpler and more efficient representation is proposed, in which actions, goals and world state are modelled using ‘setGraphs’. A set Graph is an abstract data-structure able to capture implicitly the structural and topological constraints of a physical domain. Despite being model-based, the representation also allows the use of types and propositional furmulae to specify additional domain constraints. Experimental results obtained with a specific implementation of the representation indicate significant improvements in performance in all of the domains considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A. Cesta and A. Oddi. DDL.I: A formal description of a constraint representation language for physical domains. In M. Ghallab and A. Milani, editors, New Directions in AI Planning, pages 341–352. IOS Press (Amsterdam), 1996. (Proceedings of the 3rd European Workshop on Planning (EWSP95), Assisi, Italy, September 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Fox and D. Long. PDDL2.I: An extension to PDDL for expressing temporal planning domains. Journal of Artificial Intell igence Research Special issue on the 3rd International Planning Competition, 2003. (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Garagnani and Y. Ding. Model-based planning for objectrearrangement problems. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (ICAPS-03)-Workshop on PDDL, pages 49–58, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J.R. Hayes and H.A. Simon. Psychological differences among problem isomorphs. In N.J. Castellan, D.B. Pisoni, and G.R. Potts, editors, Cognitive theory. Erlbaum, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. Kotovsky, J.R. Hayes, and H.A. Simon. Why Are Some Problems Hard? Evidence from Tower of Hanoi. Cognitive Psychology, 17:248–294, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Z. Kulpa. Diagrammatic representation and reasoning. Machine GRAPHICS & VISION, 3(1/2):77–103, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J.H. Larkin and H.A. Simon. Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousands words. Cognitive Science, 11:65–99, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. D. Liu and T.L. McCluskey. The OCL Language Manual, Version 1.2. Technical report, Department of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, University of Huddersfield (UK), 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. Long and M. Fox. Automatic synthesis and use of generic types in planning. In S. Chien, S. Kambhampati, and C.A. Knoblock, editors, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on AI Planning and Scheduling Systems (AIPS’00), pages 196–205, Breckenridge, CO, April 2000. AAAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. K. Myers and K. Konolige. Reasoning with analogical representations. In B. Xebel, C. Rich, and W. Swartout, editors, Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Third International Conference (KR92), pages 189–200. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Mateo, CA, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  11. E.P.D. Pednault. Synthesizing plans that contain actions with contextdependent effects. Computational Intelligence, 4(4):356–372, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag London

About this paper

Cite this paper

Garagnani, M. (2004). Model-based Planning in Physical domains using SetGraphs. In: Coenen, F., Preece, A., Macintosh, A. (eds) Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XX. SGAI 2003. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-412-8_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-412-8_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-780-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-412-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics