Skip to main content
  • 727 Accesses

Abstract

The Mail2Tag system leverages existing practices around enterprise email to move relevant information out from individual inboxes. With Mail2Tag users share information by emailing content to a special email address, such as CC to sometag@share.company.com, where ‘sometag’ can be any keyword. The system then adaptively redistributes the information based on profiles inferred from prior user activity in the system. In this way no changes to the email client are required for users to participate in the system and information is routed based on individual need, while the amount of information noise is reduced. We study the Mail2Tag system and its 20-month deployment in an organization as a lens to understand how to measure the adoption for this type of tool for sharing. We assess adoption via quantitative and qualitative measures and identify key factors that facilitate or constrain adoption. Our findings suggest that perceived usefulness is a key facilitator and that people are drawn to different levels of use depending on their social role in the organization. Each level of use is a valuable contribution in itself and should be accounted for when assessing adoption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adamic, L. A., Zhang, J., Bakshy, E., and Ackerman, M. S. (2008). Knowledge sharing and yahoo answers: everyone knows something. Proc. WWW’08, 665–674.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arazy, O., Gellatly, I., Soobaek J., Patterson, R., (2010). Wiki deployment in corporate settings. In Technology and Society Magazine, IEEE, 28(2) (2009), 57–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bouzdine T. and Bourakova-Lorgnier M. The Role of Social Capital within Business Networks: Analysis of Structural and Relational Arguments. In Proc. of OKLC, April 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brzozowski, M. J., Sandholm, T., and Hogg, T. (2009). Effects of feedback and peer pressure on contributions to enterprise social media. Proc. GROUP ’09. 61–70.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Burt, R.S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. Am. J. of Sociology, 110 (2). 349–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cummings, J. N. (2004). Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Science, 50(3), 352–364.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Dapper G. User acceptance of Enterprise 2.0. (2007) A case study at an internationally operating private bank. Twente Student Conference on IT, Enschede, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  8. Davis, F.D., 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13 (3), 319–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ducheneaut, N., Bellotti, V. (2001). E-mail as habitat: an exploration of embedded personal information management. Interactions, 8(5), 30–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dugan, C., Geyer, W., and Millen, D. R. (2010). Lessons learned from blog muse: audiencebased inspiration for bloggers. In Proc. of CHI 2010. ACM, New York, NY, 1965–1974.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Efimova, L. and Grudin, J. (2007). Crossing Boundaries: A Case Study of Employee Blogging. In Proc. HICSS 2007. IEEE Computer Society, W DC, 86.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ehrlich, S. F. (1987). Strategies for encouraging successful adoption of office communication systems. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 5, 4 (Oct. 1987), 340–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Farzan R., DiMicco JM, Brownholtz B. (2010) Mobilizing Lurkers with a Targeted Task. Proc. of ICWSM ’10. May 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Geyer W., Dugan C. (2010). Inspired by the Audience A Topic Suggestion System for Blog Writers and Readers. In Proc. of ACM CSCW 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Golder S. and Huberman B. A. (2006). Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems. Jour. of Information Science, 32(2): 198–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Grudin, J. (1988): Why CSCW applications fail: Problems in the design and evaluation of organizational interfaces. Proc. of CSCW’88, 85–93. ACM. Extended vers. In Office: Technology and People, 4(3), 245–264.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Grudin, J. and Poole, E. S. (2010). Wikis at work: success factors and challenges for sustainability of enterprise Wikis. In Proc. WikiSym ’10. ACM, NY, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hansen, Morten T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Adm. Science Quart. 44 82–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Holtzblatt, L. J., Damianos, L. E., and Weiss, D. 2010. Factors impeding Wiki use in the enterprise: a case study. In Proc. of CHI 2010. ACM, NY, 4661–4676.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jackson, A., Yates, J., Orlikowski, W. Corporate Blogging: Building community through persistent digital talk. In Proc. of HICSS’07, IEEE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kittur, A., Chi, E., Pendleton, B. A., Suh, B., & Mytkowicz, T. (2007). Power of the few vs. wisdom of the crowd: Wikipedia and the rise of the bourgeoisie. Alt.CHI, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lampe, C., Wash, R., Velasquez, A., Ozkaya, E. (2010), Motivations to participate in online communities, In Proc. of CHI 2010, pp. 1927–1936.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Markus, M. L. Electronic mail as the medium of managerial choice. Org. Sci., 5(4), 502–527.

    Google Scholar 

  24. McAfee, A. Enterprise 2.0: New collaborative tools for your organization’s toughest challenges. Harvard Business Press,.Boston, MA. 2009

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nelson, L., Convertino, G., Nairn, R., Chi, E. H., Mail2Tag: information sharing through augmenting email practices with implicit tag-based categorization, to appear in Proc. of The 2011 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS 2011), 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  26. O’reilly, T., (2007). What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. Communications & Strategies, 1, p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). Learning from Notes: organizational issues in groupware implementation. In Proc. of CSCW 1992. ACM, New York, NY, 362–369.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Palen, L. and Grudin, J. 2003. Discretionary adoption of group support software: lessons from calendar applications. In Implementing Collaboration Technologies in industry: Case Examples and Lessons Learned, Munkvold, Ed. Springer-V., London, 159–179.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pirolli, P. (2009). An elementary social information foraging model. In Proc. of CHI’09.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Preece J. and Shneiderman, B. (2009) The reader to leader framework: Motivating technology-Mediated social participation. AIS Trans. on HCI, 1(1), 13–32

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rosenthal, Elizabeth A. (1996). Social Networks and Team Performance. Dissertation. University of Chicago, Graduate School of Business.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Steinfield, C., DiMicco, J. M., Ellison, N. B., and Lampe, C. (2009). Bowling online: social networking and social capital within the organization. In Proc. of C&T ’09. ACM, NY, 245–254.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D., User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view, (2003). MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Whittaker, S. and Sidner, C. (1996). Email Overload: Exploring Personal Information Management of Email. Proc. CHI’96, 276–283.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Whittaker, S., Terveen, L., and Nardi, B. A. 2000. Let’s stop pushing the envelope and start addressing it: a reference task agenda for HCI. HCI. 15, 2 75–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Whittaker, S., Terveen, L., Hill, W., and Cherny, L. (1998). The dynamics of mass interaction. In Proc. of CSCW ’98. ACM, NY, 257–264.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wilkinson D. M. Strong regularities in online peer production. In Proc. of the 9th ACM conf. on Electronic commerce (EC’08), NY, USA, 2008. ACM. 302–309.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Yardi S., Golder S. A., and Brzozowski M. J.. (2009) Blogging at work and the corporate attention economy. In Proc. of CHI ’09. 2071–2080.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang P. (2008) Motivational affordances: Fundamental reasons for ICT design and use, Comm. ACM, 51(11).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Les Nelson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nelson, L., Convertino, G., Chi, H., Nairn, R. (2011). Studying the Adoption of Mail2Tag: an Enterprise2.0 Tool for Sharing. In: Bødker, S., Bouvin, N., Wulf, V., Ciolfi, L., Lutters, W. (eds) ECSCW 2011: Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 24-28 September 2011, Aarhus Denmark. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-913-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-913-0_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-912-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-913-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics