Skip to main content

Models for Liars in Bradwardine's Theory of Truth

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science ((LEUS,volume 8))

Stephen Read's work on Bradwardine's theory of truth is some of the most exciting work on truth and insolubilia in recent years [4, 5]. In this paper, I give models for Read's formulation of Bradwardine's theory of truth, and I examine the behaviour of liar sentences in those models. I conclude by examining Bradwardine's argument to the effect that if something signifies itself to be untrue then it signifies itself to be true as well. We will see that there are models in which this conclusion fails. This should help us elucidate the hidden assumptions required to underpin Bradwardine's argument, and to make explicit the content of Bradwardine's theory of truth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1] A.R. Anderson, N.D. Belnap, and J.M. Dunn. Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, volume 2. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  2. [2] J.M. Dunn and G. Restall. “Relevance Logic”. In D.M. Gabbay, editor, Handbook of Philosophical Logic, volume 6, pages 1–136. Kluwer, Dordecht, Second edition, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  3. [3] S. Read. Relevant logic: a philosophical examination of inference. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  4. [4] S. Read. The Liar Paradox from John Buridan back to Thomas Bradwardine. Vivarium, 40(2):189–218, 2002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. [5] S. Read. Symmetry and Paradox. History and Philosophy of Logic, 27:307–318, 2006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. [6] G. Restall. An Introduction to Substructural Logics. Routledge, New York, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Restall. Modal Models for Bradwardine's Theory of Truth. To appear in the Review of Symbolic Logic, special issue on Mathematical Methods in Philosophy, edited by Richard Zach, Alasdair Urquhart and Aldo Antonelli http://consequently.org/writing/ bradwardine

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Restall*, G. (2008). Models for Liars in Bradwardine's Theory of Truth. In: Rahman, S., Tulenheimo, T., Genot, E. (eds) Unity, Truth and the Liar. Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8468-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics