Skip to main content
  • 1734 Accesses

Abstract

Due to increasing demand for simulation and modeling, efforts are needed to build up more powerful simulation and modeling methodologies that can help to facilitate learning complex dynamic systems. By learning we mean the acquisition of knowledge, skills and experience for better and faster learning of the various types of complex dynamic systems. System dynamics is one of the successful well formulated methodologies that provides a perfect framework for building highly interactive learning environments where learners involve in reasoning about the relationships between the structure and the dynamics of a complex system. In this paper, we address two recent well known approaches (Black-Box and Glass-Box) that enhance learning capabilities in a typical complex dynamic system and demonstrate the overall learning effectiveness by using their own methodologies. Furthermore, we present a critical comparison of traditional black-box approach and the innovative glass-box approach. In addition, we also present two experiments that are associated with the black-box approach. These experiments will be very helpful for understanding the inadequacy of a black-box approach when compare it to the glass-box approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dean L. Christensen, J. Michael Spector, Alexei V. Sioutine, Dalton Mc Cormack, “Evaluating the impact of system dynamics based learning environments: Preliminary study,” Paper presentation at the international system dynamics society Meeting, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, 8 August, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Marcelo Milrad, J. Michael Spector, Pal I. Davidsen, “Model Facilitated Learning,” accepted for publishing in a volume edited by Som Naidu entitled eLearning: Technology and the development of teaching and learning.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jay W. Forrester, “Learning through system dynamics as preparation of the 21st century,” Keynote address for system thinking and dynamic modeling conference for K-12 education at Concord Academy Concord, MA, USA, June 27-29, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Senge P. M, “The Fifth Discipline: the Art and Practice of the Learning Organization,” New York – London – Toronto –Sidney- Auckland 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Salomon G, “Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations,” New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Scandura J.M, “Theoretical foundations of instruction: Past, present, and future,” Journal of Structural Learning, 12(3), 231-243, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sterman J. D, “Learning in and about complex systems: System Dynamics Review,” 10(2/3), 291-300, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Spector J.M, Davidsen P.I, “Cognitive complexity in system dynamics based learning environments,” Presented at the International System Dynamics Conference, Istanbul, Turkey, 21 August, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Davidsen P.I, Spector J. M, Milrad. M, “Learning in and about simple systems,” In R. Y. Cavana, J. A. Vennix, E. Rouwette, M. Stevenson-Wright, J. Cavendish (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society and 5th Australian & New Zealand Systems Conference. Wellington, NZ: Webrights, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sterman J.D, “People express management flight simulator,” Cambridge, MA: Sloan School of Management. 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dorner D, “The logic of failure: Why things go wrong and what we can do to make them right,” (R. Kimber & R. Kimber, Trans.). New York: Metropolitan Books. (Original work published in 1989)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Aviv, R., Z. Erlich, G. Ravid, and A. Geva,“Network Analysis of Knowledge Construction in Asynchronous Learning Networks,” Journal of Asynchronous Networks, vol. 7, pp. 1–23, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Aviv, Z. Erlich, and G. Ravid, “Reciprocity Analysis of Online Learning Networks”, Journal of Asynchronous Networks,Volume 9, Issue 4 - December 2005

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Riasat, A., Rizvi, S.S., Zehara, F., Arain, F. (2008). The Role of System Dynamics in Learning Environments. In: Iskander, M. (eds) Innovative Techniques in Instruction Technology, E-learning, E-assessment, and Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8739-4_95

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8739-4_95

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8738-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8739-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics