Skip to main content

Processing Information from a Set of Sources

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Trends in Logic ((TREN,volume 28))

Abstract

We introduce a general framework for solving the problem of a computer collecting and combining information from various sources. Unlike previous approaches to this problem, in our framework the sources are allowed to provide information about complex formulae too. This is enabled by the use of a new tool—non-deterministic logical matrices. We also consider several alternative plausible assumptions concerning the framework which lead to various logics. We provide strongly sound and complete proof systems for all the basic logics induced in this way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, A.R., Belnap, N.D., ‘First degree entailments’, Mathematische Annalen, 149: 302–319, 1963.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, A.R., Belnap, N.D., Entailment, vol. 1, Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Avron, A., ‘Natural 3-valued logics: Characterization and proof theory’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 56: 276–294, 1991.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Avron, A., ‘Logical Non-determinism as a tool for logical modularity: an introduction’, in Artemov, S., Barringer, H., d’Avila Garcez, A.S., Lamb, L.C., Woods, J. (eds.), We Will Show Them: Essays in Honor of Dov Gabbay, vol. 1, College Publications, Ithaca, NY, 2005, pp. 105–124.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Avron, A., Lev, I., ‘Canonical propositional Gentzen-type systems’, in Goré, R., Leitsch, A., Nipkow, T., Proceedings of the 1st International Joint Conference on Automated Reasoning (IJCAR 2001), LNAI, vol. 2083, Springer Verlag, 2001, pp. 529–544.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Avron, A., Lev, I., ‘Non-deterministic multiple-valued structures’, Journal of Logic and Computation, 15: 241–261, 2005.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Avron, A., Ben-Naim, J., Konikowska, B., ‘Cut-free ordinary sequent calculi for logics having finite-valued semantics’, Logica Universalis, 1: 41–69, 2006.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Belnap, N.D., ‘How computers should think’, in Rylem, G. (ed.), Contemporary Aspects of Philosophy, Oriel Press, Stocksfield, England, 1977, pp. 30–56.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Belnap, N.D., ‘A useful four-valued logic’, in Epstein, G., Dunn, J.M., Modern Uses of Multiple-Valued Logic, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1977, pp. 7–37.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Carnielli, W.A., Lima-Marques, M., ‘Society semantics for multiple-valued logics’, in Carnielli, Walter A., D’Ottaviano, Itala M.L. (eds.), Proceedings of the XII EBL—Advances in Contemporary Logic and Computer Science, American Mathematical Society, Series Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 235, 1999, pp. 33–52.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Carnielli, W.A., Marcos, J., de Amo, S., ‘Formal inconsistency and evolutionary databases’, Logic and Logical Philosophy, 8: 115–152, 2000.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Dunn, J.M., ‘Intuitive semantics for first degree entailments and “coupled trees''', Philosophical Studies, 29: 149–168, 1976.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Dunn, J.M., ‘Relevant logic and entailment’, Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. III, Gabbay, D., Guenthner, F. (eds.), 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Epstein, R.L., The semantic foundation of logic, 2nd ed., vol. I: Propositional Logics, ch. IX, Kluwer Academic Publisher, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fitting, M., ‘Kleene’s three-valued logics and their children’, Fundamenta Informaticae, 20: 113–131, 1994.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Ginsberg, M.L., ‘Multivalued logics: A uniform approach to reasoning in AI’, Computer Intelligence, 4: 256–316, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  17. D’Ottaviano, I.L.M., da Costa, N.C.A., ‘Sur un problème de Jaśkowski’, Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences de Paris, 270: 1349–1353, 1970.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. D’Ottaviano, I.L.M., ‘The completeness and compactness of a three-valued first-order logic’, Revista Colombiana de Matematicas, XIX: 31–42, 1985.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Shramko, Y., Wansing, H., ‘Some useful 16-valued logics. How a computer network should think’, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 34: 121–153, 2005.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Shramko, Y., Wansing, H., ‘Hyper-contradictions, generalized truth values, and logics of truth and falsehood’, Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 15: 403–424, 2006.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arnon Avron .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Avron, A., Ben-Naim, J., Konikowska, B. (2009). Processing Information from a Set of Sources. In: Makinson, D., Malinowski, J., Wansing, H. (eds) Towards Mathematical Philosophy. Trends in Logic, vol 28. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9084-4_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics