Skip to main content

Comining Quantitative and Qualitative Models with Active Observtions to Improve Diagnosis of Complex Systems

  • Chapter
  • 655 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 38))

Abstract

Quantitative and qualitative models and reasoning methods for diagnosis are able to cover a wide range of different properties of a system. Both groups of methods have advantages and drawbacks in respect to fault diagnosis. In this chapter we propose a framework which combines methods of both groups to a combined diagnosis engine in order to improve the overall quality of diagnosis. Moreover, we present the different methods based on a running example of an autonomous mobile robot. Furthermore, we discuss the problems and research topics which arise from such a fusion of diverse methods. Finally, we explain how actively gathered observation are able to further improve the quality of diagnosis of complex systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Friedrich G., Stumptner M., and Wotawa F., Model-based diagnosis of hardware designs. Artificial Intelligence, 111(2):3–39 (1999).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Hofbaur M., Köb J., Steinbauer G., and Wotawa F., Improving robustness of mobile robots using model-based reasoning. Journal of Intelligence and Robotic Systems, 48(1):37–54 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Steinbauer G. and Wotawa F., Detecting and locating faults in the control software of autonomous mobile robots. In 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-05), pp. 1742–1743 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Köb D. and Wotawa F., Introducing alias information into model-based debugging. In Ramon Lopez de Mantaras and Lorenza Saitta, editors, Proceedings of the 16th Eureopean Conference on Artificial Intelligence, ECAI’2004, pp. 833–837 (2004). IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Struss P. and Price C., Model-based systems in the automotive industry. AI Magazine, 24(4):17–34 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Muscettola N., Nayak P., Pell B., and Williams B., Remote agent: To boldly go where no AI system has gone before. Artificial Intelligence, 103(1–2):5–48 (1998).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Reiter R., A theory of diagnosis from first principles. Artificial Intelligence, 32(1):57–95 (1987).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Hamscher W., Console L., and de Kleer J., Readings in Model-Based Diagnosis. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mate. (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kalman R., A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. ASME Transactions, Journal of Basic Engineering, 82:35–50 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Anderson B. and Moore J., Optimal Filtering. Information and System Sciences Series. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Isermann R., Supervision, fault-detection and fault-diagnosis methods - an introduction. Control Engineering Practice, 5(5):639–652 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen J. and Patton R., Robust Model-Based Fault Diagnosis for Dynamic Systems. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dearden R. and Clancy D., Particle filters for real-time fault detection in planetary rovers. In Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Principles of Diagnosis, pages 1 – 6 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Verma V., Gordon G., Simmons R., and Thrun S., Real-time fault diagnosis. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 11(2):56 – 66 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Roos N., ten Teije A., Bos A., and Witteveen C., Multi-agent diagnosis with spatially distributed knowledge. In Proceedings of the Belgium-Netherlands Artificial Intelligence Conference (BNAIC), pp 275–282 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  16. de Kleer J., Getting the probabilities right for measurement selection. In 17th InternationalWorkshop on Principles of Diagnosis (DX-06), pp 141–146 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hofbaur M., Hybrid Estimation of Complex Systems, volume 319 of Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences. Springer Verlag, New York (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Drolet L., Michaud F., and Cote J., Adaptable sensor fusion using multiple kalman filters. In Proceedings IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). (2000).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Steinbauer, G., Wotawa, F. (2009). Comining Quantitative and Qualitative Models with Active Observtions to Improve Diagnosis of Complex Systems. In: Martínez Madrid, N., Seepold, R.E. (eds) Intelligent Technical Systems. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 38. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9823-9_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9823-9_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9822-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9823-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics