Abstract
The purpose of this chapter is to examine the existent and potential contribution of argumentation theory to decision aiding, more specifically to multi-criteria decision aiding. On the one hand, decision aiding provides a general framework that can be adapted to different contexts of decision making and a formal theory about preferences. On the other hand, argumentation theory is a growing field of Artificial Intelligence, which is interested in non-monotonic logics. It is the process of collecting arguments in order to justify and explain conclusions. The chapter is decomposed into three successive frames, starting from general considerations regarding decision theory and Artificial Intelligence, moving on to the specific contribution of argumentation to decision-support systems, to finally focus on multi-criteria decision aiding.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
L. Amgoud. Argumentation for decision making. In I. Rahwan and G.Simari, editors, Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, pages 301–320. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 2009.
L. Amgoud, J.-F. Bonnefon, and H. Prade. An argumentation-based approach to multiple criteria decision. In Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty (ECSQARU’05), Barcelona, Spain, July 6–8, 2005, volume 3571 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 269–280. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 2005.
L. Amgoud and C. Cayrol. Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks. International Journal of Automated Reasoning, 29(2):125–169, 2002.
L. Amgoud, C. Cayrol, and M.-C. Lagasquie Schiex. On the bipolarity in argumentation frameworks. In J.P. Delgrande and T. Schaub, editors, Proceedings of 10th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (NMR’04). Whistler, Canada, pages 1–9, 2004.
L. Amgoud, N. Maudet, and S. Parsons. Modelling dialogues using argumentation. In E. Durfee, editor, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS’00), pages 31–38, Boston, USA, 2000.
L. Amgoud, N. Maudet, and S. Parsons. An argumentation-based semantics for agent communication languages. In F. Van Harmelen, editor, Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI’02), pages 38–42, Lyon, France, 2002.
L. Amgoud and H. Prade. Using arguments for making decisions: A possibilistic logic approach. In Proccedings of the 20th Conference of Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI’04). Banff, Canada, July 7–11, 2004, pages 10–17. AUAI Press, 2003.
L. Amgoud and H. Prade. Explaining qualitative decision under uncertainty by argumentation. In Y. Gil and R. Moo, editors, Proceedings of the 21st Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’06). Boston, USA, July 16–20, 2006. AAAI Press, 2006.
Aristotle. On Sophistical Refutations. Harvard University Press, Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, Mass., 1928.
Aristotle. Topics. Harvard University Press, Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, Mass., 1939.
K. Atkinson. What Should We Do? Computational Representation of Persuasive Argument in Practical Reasoning. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Liverpool, 2005.
K. Atkinson. Value-based argumentation for democratic support. In P.E. Dunne and T.J.M. Bench-Capon, editors, Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Computational Models of Natural Argument (COMMA’06). Liverpoool, UK, September 11–12, 2006, volume 144 of Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, pages 47–58. IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006.
K. Atkinson, T.J.M. Bench-Capon, and P. McBurney. PARMENIDES: Facilitating democratic debate. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Electronic Grovernment. Zaragoza, Spain, August 30 – September 3, 2004, volume 3183 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 313–316. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 2004.
K. Atkinson, T.J.M. Bench-Capon, and S. Modgil. Argumentation for decision support. In S. Bressan, J. Küng, and R. Wagner, editors, Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications. Kraków, Poland, September 4–8, 2006, volume 4080 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 822–831. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 2006.
C.A. Bana e Costa and J.C. Vansnick. Macbeth – an interactive path towards the construction of cardinal value fonctions. International Transactions in Operational Research, 1:489–500, 1994.
V. Belton and T. Stewart. Muliple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach. Kluwer Academic, 2002.
T.J.M. Bench-Capon. Value-based argumentation frameworks. In S. Benferhat and E. Giunchiglia, editors, Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (NMR2002). Toulouse, France, April 19–21, 2002, pages 4436–454, 2002.
T.J.M. Bench-Capon and H. Prakken. Argumentation. In A.R. Lodder and A. Oskamp, editors, Information Technology & Lawyers : Advanced Technology in the Legal Domain from Challenges to Daily Routine, pages 61–80. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 2006.
T.J.M Bench-Capon and H. Prakken. Justifying actions by accruing arguments. In T.J.M. Bench-Capon and P.E. Dunne, editors, Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA’06). Liverpoool, UK, September 11–12, 2006, pages 247–258. IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2006.
S. Benferhat, D. Dubois, and H. Prade. Argumentative inference in uncertain and inconsistent knowledge base. In Proceedings of the 9th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI93). Providence, USA, July 9–11, 1993, pages 411–419. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1993.
L. Birnbaum, M. Flowers, and R. McGuire. Towards an artificial intelligence model of argumentation. In R. Balzer, editor, Proceedings of the 1st Annual National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Stanford University, August 18–21, 1980, pages 313–315. AAAI Press, 1980.
A. Blum, J. Jackson, T. Sandholm, and M. Zinkevich. Preference elicitation and query learning. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 5:649 – 667, 2004.
B. Bonet and H. Geffner. Arguing for decisions: A qualitative model of decision making. In E. Horvitz and F.V. Jensen, editors, Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI’96). Portland, USA, August 1–4, 1996, pages 98–105. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1996.
J.-F. Bonnefon and H. Fargier. Comparing sets of positive and negative arguments: Empirical assessment of seven qualitative rules. In G. Brewka, S. Coradeschi, A. Perini, and P. Traverso, editors, Proceedings of 17th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence(ECAI’06). Riva del Garda, Italy, August 29 – September 1, 2006, pages 16–20, 2006.
D. Bouyssou, T. Marchant, M. Pirlot, P. Perny, A. Tsoukiàs, and Ph. Vincke. Evaluation and Decision Models: A Critical Perspective. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2000.
D. Bouyssou, T. Marchant, M. Pirlot, A. Tsoukiàs, and Ph. Vincke. Evaluation and Decision Models with Multiple Criteria: Stepping Stones for the Analyst. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 2006.
D. Bouyssou and Ph. Vincke. Ranking alternatives on the basis of preference relations: A progress report with special emphasis on outranking relations. Journal of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, 6:77–85, 1997.
D.V. Carbogim, D. Robertson, and J. Lee. Argument-based applications to knowledge engineering. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 15(2):119–149, 2000.
L. Carlson. Dialogue Games: An Approach to Discourse Analysis. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1983.
C. Cayrol and M.-C. Lagasquie Schiex. On the acceptability of arguments in bipolar argumentation frameworks. In Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty (ECSQARU’05), pages 378–389, 2005.
C.I. Chesñevar and A.G. Maguitman. ArgueNet: An argument-based recommender system for solving web search queries. In Proceedings of the 2nd international IEEE Conference on Intelligent Systems, pages 282–287, Varna, Bulgaria, 2004. IEEE Press.
C.I. Chesñevar, A.G. Maguitman, and R.P. Loui. Logical models of argument. ACM Computing Surveys, 32(4):337–383, 2000.
C.I. Chesñevar, A.G. Maguitman, and M. Sabaté. An argument-based decision support system for assessing natural language usage on the basis of the web corpus. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2006.
C.I. Chesñevar, A.G. Maguitman, and G.R. Simari. A first approach to argument-based recommender systems based on defeasible logic programing. In J.P. Delgrande and T. Schaub, editors, Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Non Monotonic Reasoning (NMR’04). Whistler, Canada, June 6–8, 2004, pages 109–117, June 2004.
C.I. Chesñevar, A.G. Maguitman, and G.R. Simari. Argument-based critics and recommenders: a qualitative perspective on user support systems. Journal of Data and Knowledge Engineering, 59(2):293–319, 2006.
M. Dastani, J. Hulstijn, and L.W.N. van der Torre. How to decide what to do? European Journal of Operational Research, 160(3):762–784, 2005.
L.C. Dias and V. Mousseau. Inferring Electre’s veto-related parameters from outranking examples. European Journal of Operational Research, 170:172–191, 2006.
Y. Dimopoulos, P. Morasitis, and A. Tsoukiàs. Argumentation based modeling of decision aiding for autonomous agents. In Proceedings of the Intelligent Agent Technology IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference (IAT 2004), pages 99–105. IEEE Computer Society, Washington DC, 2004.
J. Doyle. A truth maintenance system. Artificial Intelligence, 12:231–272, 1979.
J. Doyle and R.H. Thomason. Background to qualitative decision theory. AI Magazine, 20:55–68, 1999.
P.M. Dung. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence, 77(2):321–358, 1995.
G. Ferguson, J. Allen, and B. Miller. Trains-95 : Towards a mixed-initiative planning assistant. In B. Drabble, editor, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on AI Planning Systems. Edinburgh, Scotalnd, May 29–31, 1996, pages 70–77. AAAI Press, 1996.
J. Figueira, S. Greco, and M. Ehrgott, editors. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. Springer Verlag, Boston, 2005.
J. Fox, D. Barber, and K.D. Bardhan. Alternatives to Bayes? A quantitative comparison with rule-based diagnostic inference. Methods of Information in Medicine, 19(4):210–215, 1980.
J. Fox, P. Krause, and M. Elvang-Gøransson. Argumentation as a general framework for uncertain reasoning. In D. Heckerman and A. Mamdani, editors, Proceedings of the 9th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI’93). Providence, USA, July 9–11, 1993, pages 428–434. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo CA, 1993.
J. Fox and S. Parsons. On using arguments for reasoning about actions and values. In Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Qualitative Preferences in Deliberation and Practical Reasoning. Stanford, USA, 1997, pages 55–63. AAAI Press, 1997.
J. Fox and S. Parsons. Arguing about beliefs and actions. In Applications of Uncertainty Formalisms, volume 1455 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 266–302, 1998.
L.A. Franco, D. Shaw, and M. Westcombe. Special issue: Problem structuring methods. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57:757 – 883, 2006.
A.J. García and G.R. Simari. Defeasible logic programming: An argumentative approach. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 4(2):95–138, 2004.
D. Glasspool, J. Fox, A. Oettinger, and J. Smith-Spark. Argumentation in decision support for medical care planning for patients and clinicians. In T. Bickmore and N. Green, editors, Proceedings of AAAI Spring Symposium Series 2006. AAAI Press, New York, 2006.
D. Goldberg, D. Nichols, B.M. Oki, and D. Terry. Using collaborative filtering to weave an information tapestry. Communications of the ACM, 35(12):61–70, 1992.
M.K. Goldstein, B.B. Hoffman, R.W. Coleman, M.A. Musen, S.W. Tu, A. Advani, R. Shankar, and M. O’Connor. Implementing clinical practice guidelines while taking account of changing evidence: ATHENA DSS, an easily modifiable decision-support system for managingan hypertension in primary care. Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association Symposium, 20:300–304, 2000.
S.A. Gómez and C.I. Chesñevar. A hybrid approach to pattern classification using neural networks and defeasible argumentation. In Proceedings of the 17th International FLAIRS Conference. Florida, USA, 2004, pages 393–398. AAAI Press, Stanford CA, 2004.
T. Gordon, N.I. Karacapilidis, H. Voss, and A. Zauke. Computer-mediated cooperative spatial planning. In H. Timmermans, editor, Decision Support Systems in Urban Planning, pages 299–309. E & FN Spon, London, 1997.
T.F. Gordon and N.I. Karacapilidis. The zeno argumentation framework. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL’97). Melbourne, Australia, June 30–July 3, 1997, pages 10–18. ACM Press, 1997.
T.F. Gordon and D. Walton. Proof burdens and standards. In I. Rahwan and G. Simari, editors, Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, pages 239–260. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 2009.
S. Greco, B. Matarazzo, and R. Slowinski. Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 129:1–47, 2001.
S. Greco, B. Matarazzo, and R. Slowinski. Chapter 13: Decision rule approach. In J. Figueira, S. Greco, and M. Ehrgott, editors, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, pages 507–562. Springer Verlag, Boston, 2005.
S. Greco, V. Mousseau, and R. Slowinski. Ordinal regression revisited: multiple criteria ranking using a set of additive value functions. European Journal of Operational Research, 191:415–435, 2008.
F. Guinchiglia. Contextual reasoning. Epistemoligia, 16:345–364, 1993.
V. Ha and P. Haddawy. Similarity of personal preferences: Theoretical foundations and empirical analysis. Artificial Intelligence, 146:149 – 173, 2003.
P. Haddaway, V. Ha, A. Restificar, B. Geisler, and J. Miyamoto. Preference elicitation via theory refinement. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 4:317 – 337, 2003.
A.C. Hastings. A Reformulation of the Modes of Reasoning in Argumentation. PhD thesis, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, 1963.
E. Jacquet-Lagrèze and Y. Siskos. Preference disaggregation: 20 years of MCDA experience. European Journal of Operational Research, 130:233–245, 2001.
S. Kaci and L. Van der Torre. Preference-based argumentation: Arguments supporting multiple values. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, pages 730–751, 2008.
A.C. Kakas and P. Moraitis. Argumentative agent deliberation, roles and context. In Proceedings of CLIMA’2002 Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems. Copenhagen, Denmark, August 1, 2002, pages 35–48, 2002. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 70(5).
A.C. Kakas and P. Moraitis. Argumentation based decision making for autonomous agents. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. Melbourne, Australia, pages 883–890. ACM Press, New York, NY, 2003.
N.I. Karacapilidis and D. Papadias. A group decision and negotiation support system for argumentation based reasoning. In Selected Papers from the Workshop on Reasoning with Incomplete and Changing Information and on Inducing Complex Representations (PRICAI ’96), volume 1359 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 188–205. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1998.
N.I. Karacapilidis and D. Papadias. Hermes: Supporting argumentative discourse in multi-agent decision making. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth National/Tenth Conference on Artificial Intelligence/Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Madison, WI, pages 827–832. American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Menlo Park, CA, 1998.
N.I. Karacapilidis and D. Papadias. Computer supported argumentation and collaborative decision making: The HERMES system. Information System, 26:259–277, 2001.
N.I. Karacapilidis, D. Papadias, T.F. Gordon, and H. Voss. Collaborative environmental planning with GeoMed. European Journal of Operational Research, 102(2):335–346, 1997.
R.L. Keeney and H. Raiffa. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. J. Wiley, New York, 1976.
A. Kilgarriff and G. Grefenstette. Web as corpus. Introduction to the special issue on the Web as corpus. Computational Linguistics, 29(3):333–347, 2003.
J.A. Konstan. Introduction to recommender systems: Algorithms and evaluation. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 22(1):1–4, 2004.
K.L. Kraemer and J.L. King. Computer-based systems for cooperative work and group decision making. ACM Computing Surveys, 20(2):115–146, 1988.
W. Kunz and H.W. Rittel. Issues as elements of informations systems. Technical Report 131, Institut für Grundlagen der Planung, Universität Stuttgart, 1970.
P. Maes. Agents that reduce work and information overload. Communications of the ACM, 37(7):30–40, 1994.
P. McBurney and S. Parsons. Risk agoras: Dialectical argumentation for scientific reasoning. In C. Boutilier and M. Goldszmidt, editors, Proceedings of 16th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI’00). Stanford, USA, June 30–July 3, 2000, pages 371–379. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco CA, 2000.
P. McBurney and S. Parsons. Representing epistemic uncertainty by means of dialectical argumentation. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 32(1–4):125–169, 2001.
P. McBurney and S. Parsons. Dialogue game protocols. In Communication in Multiagent Systems. Agent Communication Languages and Conversation Policies, volume 2650 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 269–283. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 2003.
J.L. McCarthy. Epistemological problems of artificial intelligence. In Proceedings of the 5th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’77). Cambridge MA, USA, August 22–25, 1977, pages 1038–1044, 1977.
D. McDermott and J. Doyle. Nonmonotonic logic 1. Artificial Intelligence, 13:41–72, 1980.
R.C. Moore. Semantical consideration on nonmonotonic logic. Artificial Intelligence, 25: 75–94, 1985.
M. Morge. Computer supported collaborative argumentation. In F. Grasso, C. Reed, and G. Caremini, editors, Proceedings of 4th workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument (CNMA04), pages 1–4, 2004.
M. Morge. The hedgehog and the fox. an argumentation-based decision support system. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (ArgMas’07), pages 55–68, USA, 2007. Springer Verlag.
M. Musen, S. Tu, K. Das, and Y. Shahar. EON: A component-based approach to automation of protocol-directed therapy. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 3(6):367–388, 1996.
T.J. Norman, D.V. Carbogim, E.C. Krabb, and D. Walton. Argument and multi-agent systems. In C. Reed and T.J. Norman, editors, Argumentation Machines: New Frontiers in Argument and Computation, chapter 2, pages 15–54. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003.
W. Ouerdane, N. Maudet, and A. Tsoukiàs. Argument schemes and critical questions for decision aiding process. In Ph. Besnard, S. Doutre, and A. Hunter, editors, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA’08), pages 285–296. IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2008.
M. Oztürk, A. Tsoukiàs, and Ph. Vincke. Preference modelling. In J. Figueira, S. Greco, and M. Ehrgott, editors, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, pages 27–72. Springer Verlag, Boston, 2005.
S. Parons and P. McBurney. Argumentation-based dialogue for argent coordination. Group Decision and Negiciation, 12:415–439, 2003.
S. Parsons and S. Greene. Argumentation and qualitative decision making. In Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty (ECSQARU’99), London, United Kingdom, July 5–9, 1999, volume 1638 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 328–340. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1999.
S. Parsons and N. Jennings. Argumentation and multi-agent decision making. In Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Interactive and Mixed-Initiative Decision Making, Stanford, USA, pages 89–91. AAAI Press, 1998.
S. Parsons, C. Sierra, and N. Jennings. Agents that reason and negotiate by arguing. Journal of Logic and Computation, 8(3):261–292, 1998.
C. Perelman and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, London, 1969.
J.L. Pollock. Defeasible reasoning. Cognitive Science, 11:481–518, 1987.
J.L. Pollock. Cognitive Carpentry : A Blueprint for How to Build a Person. The MIT Press, Cambridge MA, 1995.
H. Prakken. A logical framework for modeling legal argument. In G. Carenini, F. Grasso, and C. Reed, editors, Proceeding of the Fourth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pages 1–9. ACM, New York, 1993.
H. Prakken. Coherence and flexibility in dialogue games for argumentation. Journal of Logic and Computation, 15(6):1009–1040, 2005.
H. Prakken and G. Sartor. Argument-based logic programming with defeasible priorities. Journal of Applied Non-classical Logics, 7:25–75, 1997.
H. Prakken and G. Sartor. The role of logic in computational models of legal argument: A critical survey. In A.C. Kaks and F. Sadri, editors, Computational Logic: Logic Programming and Beyond, Essays in Honour of Robert A. Kowalski, Part II, volume 2408 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 342–381. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 2002.
H. Prakken and G. Vreeswijk. Logical systems for defeasible argumentation. In D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner, editors, Handbook of Philosophical Logic, volume 4, pages 219–318. Kluwer Academic Publsihers, Dordrecht, 2001, 2002.
C. Reed and T.J. Norman. Argumentation Machines : New Frontiers in Argument and Computation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003.
C. Reed and D. Walton. Application of argumentation schemes. In H.V. Hansen, C.W. Tindale, J.A. Blair, R.H. Johnson, and R.C. Pinto, editors, Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argument (OSSA2001), Windsor, Canada, pages 1–8, 2001.
W. Rehg, P. McBurney, and S. Parsons. Computer decision-support systems for public argumentation: assessing deliberative legitimacy. Artificial Intelligence & Society, 19(3):203–228, 2005.
R. Reiter. A logic for default reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, 67(1,2):81–132, 1980.
R. Reiter. Nonmonotonic reasoning. Annual Review of Computer Science, 2:147–186, 1987.
N. Rescher. Introduction to Value Theory. Prentice Hall, Engleweeod Cliffs, 1969.
P. Resnick and H.R. Varian. Recommender systems. Communications of the ACM, 40(3): 56–58, 1997.
H.W.J. Rittel and M.M. Webber. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2):155–169, 1973.
F.S. Roberts. Measurement Theory, with Applications to Decision Making, Utility and the Social Sciences. Addison-Wesley, Boston, 1979.
J. Rosenhead. Rational Analysis of a Problematic World. J. Wiley, New York NY, 1989. 2nd revised edition in 2001.
M. Roubens and Ph. Vincke. Preference Modeling. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1985.
B. Roy. Decision-aid and decision-making. European Journal of Operational Research, 45:324–331, 1990.
B. Roy. The outranking approach and the foundation of ELECTRE methods. Theory and Decision, 31:49–73, 1991.
B. Roy. Decision science or decision-aid science? European Journal of Operational Research, 66:184–203, 1993.
B. Roy. Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Aiding. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1996.
B. Roy and D. Bouyssou. Aide Multicritèr à la Décision : Méthode et Cas. Economica, Paris, 1993.
T.L. Saaty. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980.
A.A. Salo and R.P. Hamalainen. Preference ratio in multiattribute evaluation (PRIME) - elicitation and decision procedures under incomplete information. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybertnetics: Part A, 31:533–545, 2001.
T. Sandholm and C. Boutilier. Preference elicitation in combinatorial auctions. In P.Cramton, Y. Shoham, and R. Steinberg, editors, Combinatorial Auctions, pages 233 – 264. MIT Press, Boston, 2006.
R.D. Shankar, S.W. Tu, and M.A. Musen. Medical arguments in an automated health care system. In Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium, Stanford University, USA, March 27–29, 2006, pages 55–63. AAAI Press, 2006.
D. Shaw, L.A. Franco, and M. Westcombe. Special issue: Problem structuring methods ii. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58:545–700, 2007.
C. Sierra, N.R. Jennings, P. Noriega, and S. Parsons. A framework for argumentation-based negotiation. In M.P. Singh, A.S. Rao, and M. Wooldridge, editors, Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Intelligent Agents IV, Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages (ATAL’97), Providence, USA, July 24–26, 1997, volume 1365 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 177–192. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1998.
C. Sillince. Multi-agent conflict resolution: a computational framework for an intelligent argumentation program. Knowledge-Based Systems, 7:75–90, 1994.
G.R. Simari and R.P. Loui. A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation. Artificial Intelligence, 53:125–157, 1992.
H.A. Simon. Rational decision making in business organisations. American Economic Review, 69:493–513, 1979.
K. Sycara. Argumentation: Planning other agent’s plans. In Proceedings of the 11th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Detroit, USA, August 20–25, 1989, pages 517–523. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco CA, 1989.
K. Sycara. Persuassive argumentation in negotiation. Theory and Decision, 28(3):203–242, 1990.
S. Toulmin. The Uses of Arguments. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1958.
A. Tsoukiàs. Preference modelling as a reasoning process: a new way to face uncertainty in multiple criteria decision support systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 55:309–318, 1991.
A. Tsoukiàs. On the concept of decision aiding process. Annals of Operations Research, 154(1):3–27, 2007.
A. Tsoukiàs. From decision theory to decision aiding methodology. European Journal of Operational Research, 187:138 –161, 2008.
A. Tsoukiàs and Ph. Vincke. Extended preference structures in MCDA. In J. Climaco, editor, Multi-criteria Analysis, pages 37–50. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1997.
B. Verheij. Rules, Reasons, Arguments: Formal Studies of Argumentation and Defeat. PhD thesis, Maastricht University, Holland, 1996.
B. Verheij. On the existence and multiplicity of extensions in dialectical argumentation. In S. Benferhat and E. Giunchiglia, editors, Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (NMR’02), Toulouse, France, April 19–21, 2002, pages 416–425, 2002.
B. Verheij. Artificial argument assistants for defeasible argumentation. Artificial Intelligence, 150(1-2):291–324, 2003.
Ph. Vincke. Exploitation of a crisp relation in a ranking problem. Theory and Decision, 32(3):221–240, 1992.
Ph. Vincke. Multicriteria Decision-Aid. J. Wiley, New York, 1992.
G. Vreeswijk. Studies in Defeasible Argumentation. PhD thesis, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1993.
G. Vreeswijk. Abstract argumentation systems. Artificial Intelligence, 90:225–279, 1997.
D. Walton. What is reasoning? What is an argument? Journal of Philosophy, 87:399–419, 1990.
D. Walton. Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 1996.
D.N. Walton. Justification of argument schemes. Australasian Journal of Logic, 3:1–13, 2005.
D.N. Walton. Visualization tools, argumentation schemes and expert opinion evidence in law. Law, Probability and Risk Advance Access, pages 1–22, 2007.
D.N. Walton and T.F. Gordon. Critical questions in computational models of legal argument. In P.E. Dunne and T. Bench-Capon, editors, International Workshop on Argumentaiton in Artificial Intelligence and Law, pages 103–111. Wolf Legal publishers, 2005.
D.N. Walton and E.C.W. Krabbe. Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Conceptions of Interpersonal Reasoning. SUNY Press, Albany, NY, 1995.
J. Wang. Artificial neural networks versus natural neural networks: a connectionist paradigm for preference assessment. Decision Support Systems, 11:415–429, 1994.
A.N. Whitehead and B. Russell. Principia Mathematica. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1910.
M.J. Wooldrdige. Reasoning About Rational Agents. MIT Press, Cambridge MA, 2000.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ouerdane, W., Maudet, N., Tsoukiàs, A. (2010). Argumentation Theory and Decision Aiding. In: Ehrgott, M., Figueira, J., Greco, S. (eds) Trends in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 142. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5904-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5904-1_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5903-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-5904-1
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)