Skip to main content

Modularity for Bipartite Networks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Annals of Information Systems ((AOIS,volume 12))

Abstract

Several real-world data are represented as bipartite networks composed of two types of vertices, such as paper–author networks and event–attendee networks. Discovering communities from such bipartite networks is important for finding similar items and for understanding overall network structures. In order to evaluate the quality of divisions of normal (unipartite) networks, Newman’s modularity is widely used. Recently, modularities for bipartite networks are proposed by Guimera and Barber. These bipartite modularities are, however, not sufficient for evaluating the degree of correspondence between communities of different vertex types, which is often important for understanding the characteristics of the communities. For example, close-knit paper communities and author communities indicate that their research topics are relatively focused rather than loose-knit communities. This chapter proposes a new bipartite modularity for evaluating community extraction from bipartite networks. Experimental results show that our new bipartite modularity is appropriate for discovering close-knit communities, and it is also useful for characterizing the communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Barber, M.J. Modularity and community detection in bipartite networks. arXiv 0707.1616v3: 1–11, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blondel, V.D., Guillaume, J.L., Lambiotte, and R., Lefebvre, E. Fast unfolding of community hierarchies in large networks. arXiv 0803.0476v1: 1–6, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clauset, A., Newman, M.E.J., and Moore, C. Finding community structure in very large networks. Physical Review E, 70(066111): 1–6, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Danon, L., Diaz-Guilera, A., Duch, J., and Arenas, A. Comparing community structure identification. Journal of Statistical Mechanics, P09008: 1–10, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dhillon, I.S. Co-clustering documents and words using bipartite spectral graph partitioning. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, pp. 269–274, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fortunato, S. and Barthelemy, M. Resolution limit in community detection. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(1): 36–41, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Guimera, R., Sales-Pardo, M., and Amaral, L.A.N. Module identification in bipartite and directed networks. Physical Review, 76(036102): 1–8, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Madeira, S.C. and Oliveira, A.L. Biclustering algorithms for biological data analysis: A survey. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, 1(1): 24–45, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Newman, M.E.J. Modularity and community structure in networks. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103: 8577–8582, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Newman, M.E.J. and Girvan, M. Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Physical Review E, 69(026113): 1–15, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sun, J., Qu, H., Chakrabarti, D., and Faloutsos, C. Neighborhood formation and anomaly detection in bipartite graphs. In Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, Houston, TX, pp. 418–425, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tanay, A., Sharan, R., and Shamir, R. Discovering statistically significant biclusters in gene expression data. Bioinformatics, 18(Suppl.1): S136–S144, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhou, D., Orshanskiy, S.A., Zha, H., and Giles, C.L. Co-ranking authors and documents in a heterogeneous network. In Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, Omaha, NE, pp. 739–744, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhou, T., Ren, J., Medo, M., and Zhang, Y.C. Bipartite network projection and personal recommendation. Physical Review E, 76(046115): 1–7, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Mr. Makoto Okamoto, Prof. Kikuo Maekawa (The National Institute for Japanese Language), and Prof. Sadaoki Furui (Tokyo Institute of Technology) for allowing us to use the data of Yahoo! Chiebukuro.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tsuyoshi Murata .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer US

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Murata, T. (2010). Modularity for Bipartite Networks. In: Memon, N., Xu, J., Hicks, D., Chen, H. (eds) Data Mining for Social Network Data. Annals of Information Systems, vol 12. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6287-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics