Skip to main content

Development of a Mobile Situation Awareness Tool Supporting Disaster Recovery of Business Operations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1291 Accesses

Part of the book series: Annals of Information Systems ((AOIS,volume 13))

Abstract

Situation awareness (SA) is deemed essential when tackling situations that are characterised by complexity, hard-to-define causal relationships, dynamic changes, and lack of information. This chapter describes the development of a model and tool to support collaborative construction of SA. The proposed model organises awareness information elements according to situation dimensions, dimensional elements, and correlations between dimensional elements. The approach provides a strategic view of the situation and a structure supporting concurrent information updates. The developed tool supports collaborative information management using mobile devices and pen-based interaction. The chapter also reports a case study that has employed the model and tool to support the disaster recovery (DR) of business operations.The adopted research approach is exploratory and theory-driven. The evaluation task adopted the inspection method, employing experts in critical infrastructure maintenance. The obtained results indicate the model and tool are adequate to the types of disruptive events faced by ­critical infrastructure maintenance teams. The obtained results also indicate the proposed model and tool are regarded as mostly important to less ­experienced members; and also fundamental to the development of emergency plans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Antunes, P. and P. André, “A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Geo-Collaborative Systems,” Group Decision and Negotiation, 15, 2006, 273–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baeza-Yates, R. and J. Pino, “Towards Formal Evaluation of Collaborative Work and Its Application to Information Retrieval,” Information Research, 11, 4, 2006, 271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, D., R. Day and E. Salas, “Teamwork as an Essential Component of High-Reliability Organizations,” Health Services Research, 41, 4, 2006, 1576–1598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baloian, N. and G. Zurita, “Mc-Supporter: Flexible Mobile Computing Supporting Learning Though Social Interaction,” Journal of Universal Computer Science, 15, 9, 2009, 1833–1851.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baloian, N., G. Zurita, P. Antunes and F. Baytelman, “A Flexible, Lightweight Middleware Supporting the Development of Distributed Applications across Platforms,” The 11th International Conference on CSCW in Design, Melbourne, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedny, G. and D. Meister, “Theory of Activity and Situation Awareness,” International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 3, 1, 1999, 63–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, R., “On Theory-Driven Design and Deployment of Collaboration Systems,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64, 7, 2006, 573–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruinsma, G. and R. Hoog, Third International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (ISCRAM), Newark, 2006, 53–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai, G., A. MacEachren, I. Brewer, M. McNeese, R. Sharma and S. Fuhrmann, “Map-Mediated Geocollaborative Crisis Management,” Intelligence and Security Informatics, Heidelberg: Springer, 2005, 429–435.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J., Making Use: Scenario-Based Design of Human-Computer Interactions. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drabek, T. and D. McEntire, “Emergent Phenomena and the Sociology of Disaster: Lessons, Trends and Opportunities from Research Literature,” Disaster Prevention and Management, 12, 2003, 97–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endsley, M., “Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems,” Human Factors, 31, 7, 1995, 32–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endsley, M., Designing for Situation Awareness. London: Taylor & Francis, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endsley, M. and W. Jones, “A Model of Inter and Intra Team Situation Awareness: Implications for Design, Training And Measurement” in M. McNeese, E. Salas and M. Endsley, (eds.), New Trends in Cooperative Activities: Understanding System Dynamics in Complex Environments. Santa Monica: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2001, 46–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiori, S., E. Salas, H. Cuevas and C. Bowers, “Distributed Coordination Space: Toward a Theory of Distributed Team Process and Performance,” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 4, 3 and 4, 2003, 340–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauducheau, N., E. Soulier and M. Lewkowicz, “Design and Evaluation of Activity Model-Based Groupware: Methedological Issues,” in Proceedings of the 14th IEEE International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprise. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society, 2005, 226–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerring, J., Case Study Research Principles and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grint, K. and S. Woolgar, The Machine at Work. Cambridge: Blackwell, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrald, J. and L. Stoddard, “Scenario Based Identification and Structuring of Information Needs for the Response to Complex International Crisis,” in Proceedings of the 5th Annual Conference of the Emergency Management Society, Washington, DC, 1998, 295–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, J., Safety Decision Making in High Hazard Organisations at the Production/Maintenance Interface – A Literature Review. Canberra: The Australian National University, National Research Centre for OHS Regulation, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, S., S. Purao and A. Skattebo, “Situating Evaluation in Scenarios of Use,” in Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Chicago: ACM Press, 2004, 92–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, H., Industrial Accident Prevention. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herskovic, V., J. Pino, S. Ochoa and P. Antunes, “Evaluation Methods for Groupware Systems” in Haake, J., S. Ochoa, and A. Cechich (eds.), Groupware: Design, Implementation, and Use, Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop, CRIWG 2007, Bariloche, September 2007. Heidelberg: Springer, 2007, 328–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiles, A., The Definitive Handbook of Business Continuity Management. West Sussex: Wiley, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel, E., Barriers and Accident Prevention. Hampshire: Ashgate, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel, E. and D. Woods, Joint Cognitive Systems: Foundations of Cognitive Systems Engineering. Boca Raton: CRC, 2005a.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel, E. and D. Woods, Joint Cognitive Systems: Introduction to Cognitive Systems Engineering. Boca Raton: CRC, 2005b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J., V. King, T. Rodden and H. Andersen, “Moving out from the Control Room: Ethnography in System Design,” Proceedings of the 1994 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Chapel Hill: ACM, 1994, 429–439.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kanno, T. and K. Furuta, “Resilience of Emergency Response Systems” in E. Hollnagel and E. Rigaud (eds.), Proceedings of the Second Resilience Engineering Symposium. Antibes: Les Presses, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, C., “Simplifying Disasters: Developing a Model for Complex Non-Linear Events,” Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 14, 1, 1998, 25–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwan, M. and J. Lee, “Emergency Response after 9/11: The Potential of Real-Time 3d Gis for Quick Emergency Response in Micro-Spatial Environments,” Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 29, 2, 2005, 93–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauwers, J. and K. Lantz, “Collaboration Awareness in Support of Collaboration Transparency: Requirements for the Next Generation of Shared Window Systems,” in Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Empowering People. Seattle: ACM, 1990, 303–311.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • MacEachren, A., “Moving Geovisualization Toward Support for Group Work” in J. Dykes, A. MacEachren and M. Kraak (eds.), Exploring Geovisualization. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2005, 445–462.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, M., A. Majchrzak and L. Gasser, “A Design Theory for Systems That Support Emergent Knowledge Processes,” Management Information Systems Quarterly, 26, 3, 2002, 179–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • McManus, S., E. Seville, D. Brunsdon and J. Vargo, “Resilience Management: A Framework for Assessing and Improving the Resilience of Organizations,” Resilient Organizations, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. and A. Huberman, Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milis, K. and B. Walle, “IT for Corporate Crisis Management: Findings from a Survey in 6 Different Industries on Management Attention, Intention and Actual Use,” 40th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science. Waikoloa: IEEE Computer Society, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Möller, K., “Sense-Making and Agenda Construction in Emerging Business Networks – How to Direct Radical Innovation,” Industrial Marketing Management, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monares, A., S. Ochoa, J. Pino, V. Herskovic and A. Neyem, “Mobilemap: A Collaborative Application to Support Emergency Situations in Urban Areas,” 13th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design. Santiago: IEEE, 2009, 565–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G., “Cramming More Components onto Integrated Circuits,” Electronics, 38, 8, April 19, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mourão, H. and P. Antunes, “Supporting Effective Unexpected Exceptions Handling in Workflow Management Systems,” Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, Special Track on Organizational Engineering. Seoul: ACM, 2007, 1242–1249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz, M., M. Rodriguez, J. Favela, A. Martinez-Garcia and V. González, “Context-Aware Mobile Communication in Hospitals,” Computer, 36, 9, 2003, 38–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J., “Usability Inspection Methods,” Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Boston: ACM, 1994, 413–414.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ochoa, S., J. Pino, G. Bravo, N. Dujovne and A. Neyem, “Mobile Shared Workspaces to Support Construction Inspection Activities” in P. Zarate, J. Belaud, G. Camileri and F. Ravat (eds.), Collaborative Decision Making: Perspectives and Challenges. Amsterdam: IOS, 2008, 211–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C., Normal Accidents, Living with High-Risk Technologies. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, J., Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents. Surrey: Ashgate, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, J., The Human Contribution: Unsafe Acts, Accidents and Heroic Recoveries. Surrey: Ashgate, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhard, W., J. Schweitzer, G. Völksen and M. Weber, “CSCW Tools: Concepts and Architectures,” Computer, 27, 5, 1994, 28–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sá, M., L. Carriço and P. Antunes, “Ubiquitous Psychotherapy,” IEEE Pervasive Computing, 6, 1, 2007, 20–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salas, E., C. Prince, D. Baker and L. Shrestha, “Situation Awareness in Team Performance: Implications for Measurement and Training,” Human Factors, 37, 1, 1995, 123–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, P., N. Stanton, D. Jenkins, G. Walker, M. Young and A. Aujla, “What Really Is Going On? Review, Critique and Extension of Situation Awareness Theory,” Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. Heidelberg: Springer, 2007, 407–416.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, P., N. Stanton, G. Walker and D. Green, “Situation Awareness Measurement: A Review of Applicability for C4i Environments,” Applied Ergonomics, 37, 2, 2005, 225–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shu, Y. and K. Futura, “An Inference Method of Team Situation Awareness Based on Mutual Awareness,” Cognition, Technology & Work, 7, 2005, 272–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. and P. Hancock, “Situation Awareness Is Adaptive, Externally Directed Consciousness,” Human Factors, 37, 1995, 137–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snowden, D. and M. Boone, “A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making,” Harvard Business Review, November 2007, 69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton, N., R. Stewart, D. Harris, R. Houghton, C. Baber, R. McMaster, P. Salmon, G. Hoyle, G. Walker, M. Young, M. Linsell, R. Dymott and D. Green, “Distributed Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems: Theoretical Development and Application of an Ergonomics Methodology,” Ergonomics, 49, 12–13, 2006, 1288–1311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steves, M., E. Morse, C. Gutwin and S.A. Greenberg, “Comparison of Usage Evaluation and Inspection Methods for Assessing Groupware Usability,” in Proceedings of the 2001 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, Boulder, 2001, 125–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L., Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. New York: MIT Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tentori, M. and J. Favela, “Activity-Aware Computing for Healthcare,” IEEE Pervasive Computing, 7, 2, 2008, 51–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turoff, M., M. Chumer, B. Van de Walle and X. Yao, “The Design of a Dynamic Emergency Response Management Information System (Dermis),” Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, January 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vizcaíno, A., M. Martinez, G. Aranda and M. Piattini, “Evaluating Collaborative Applications from a Knowledge Management Approach,” 14th IEEE International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprise (WETICE’05). Washington, DC: IEEE CS Press, 2005, 221–225.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vyhmeister, R., P. Mondelo and M. Novella, “Towards a Model for Assessing Workers’ Risks Resulting from the Implementation of Information and Communication Systems and Technologies,” Human Factors in Ergonomics & Manufacturing, 16, 1, 2006, 39–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K., Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K., Making Sense of the Organization. Oxford: Blackwell, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. and K. Sutcliffe, Managing the Unexpected: Assuring High Performance in an Age of Complexity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, D. and E. Hollnagel, Joint Cognitive Systems: Patterns in Cognitive Systems Engineering. Boca Raton: CRC, 2006.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wybo, J. and M. Latiers, “Exploring Complex Emergency Situations’ Dynamic: Theoretical, Epistemological and Methodological Proposals,” International Journal of Emergency Management, 3, 1, 2006, 40–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zurita, G., P. Antunes, N. Baloian and F. Baytelman, “Mobile Sensemaking: Exploring Proximity and Mobile Applications in the Classroom,” Journal of Universal Computer Science, 13, 10, 2007, 1434–1448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zurita, G. and N. Baloian, “Handheld-Based Electronic Meeting Support,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3706, 2005, 341–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zurita, G., N. Baloian and F. Baytelman, “A Collaborative Face-to-Face Design Support System Based on Sketching and Gesturing,” Advanced Engineering Informatics, 22, 3, 2008, 340–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partially funded by Fondecyt (project 1085010) and the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (projects PTDC/EIA 67589/2006 and 102875/2008).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pedro Antunes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Antunes, P., Sapateiro, C., Zurita, G., Baloian, N. (2011). Development of a Mobile Situation Awareness Tool Supporting Disaster Recovery of Business Operations. In: Burstein, F., Brézillon, P., Zaslavsky, A. (eds) Supporting Real Time Decision-Making. Annals of Information Systems, vol 13. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7406-8_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics