Skip to main content

Computer Mediated Communication Among Teams: What are “Teams” and How are They “Virtual”?

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Computer Supported Cooperative Work ((CSCW))

Abstract

This chapter is concerned with computer-mediated communication among virtual teams. A focus on social factors in small-group interaction is required to adequately answer the question: what is a “virtual team” and how can it be said to be “virtual?” Understanding the role of social factors in small-group interaction is important since governments and corporations around the world are increasing their reliance on information technology as a surrogate for face-to-face interaction among distributed teams. Work in this area is particularly timely since, as “virtual teaming” has been on the rise, research in small groups has declined (Gladstein, 1984; Ilgen, 1999). A survey of social science research on small groups will conceivably help software designers design “group friendly” electronic environments for virtual teams. It is the first step towards knowing, for example, when a 3D rendered virtual collaboration environment would better support collaboration than email, a conference call, or a face-to-face meeting. It is anticipated that work in this area will also inform management on the social-psychological impacts of distance on small group collaboration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bales, R.R (1950). Interaction process analysis: a method for the study of small groups. Cambridge, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bly, S.A., Harrison, S.R., and Irwin, S. (1993). Media Spaces: Video, Audio, and Computing. Communications of the ACM, 36(1), 28–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradner, E., Kellogg, W., and Erickson, T. (1999). Adoption and Use of Babble: A field study of chat in the workplace. Paper presented at the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 2000), Copenhagen, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, D., and Zander, A.F. (1968). Group dynamics; research and theory. (3d ed.). New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, E., and Bly, S. (1999). “It’s all in the words”: Supporting activities with lightweight tools. Paper presented at the Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP ’99).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1949). An Experimental Study of the Effects of Co-operation and Competition Upon Group Process. Human Relations, 2,129–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dourish, P., Adler, A., Bellotti, V., and Henderson, A. (1996). Your Place or Mine?: Learning from long-term use of audio-video communication. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 5(1), 33–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dourish, P., and Bly, S. (1993). Portholes: Supporting awareness in a distributed work group. Paper presented at the Conference on Human Factors in Computing (CHI ’93).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, S. (1987). Strategies for encouraging successful adoption of office communication systems. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 5, 340–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, T., Smith, D., Kellogg, W, Laff, M., Richards, J., and Bradner, E. (1999). Socially translucent systems: Social Proxies, persistent conversations and the design of ‘Babble’. Paper presented at the Conference on Human Factors in Computing (CHI ’99), Pittsburgh, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1954). A Theory of Social Comparison Process. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1968). Informal Social Communication. In D. Cartwright and A. Zander (Eds.), Group Dynamics (3 ed.,). New York, NY: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fish, R., Kraut, R., Root, R., and Rice, R. (1992). Evaluating video as technology for information communication. Paper presented at the Conference on Human Factors in Computing (CHI ’92).

    Google Scholar 

  • French, J. (1959). The Basis of Social Power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in Social Power (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbor, MI: Research Center for Group Dynamics, University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galegher, J.R., Kraut, R.E., and Egido, C. (1990). Intellectual teamwork: social and technological foundations of cooperative work. Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gersick, C. (1988). Time and Transition in Work Teams: Toward a New Model of Group Development. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gladstein, D. (1984). Groups in Context: A Model of Task Group Effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 499–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gladstein, D., and Caldwell, D.F. (1988). Beyond Task and Maintenance. Group and Organizational Studies, 13, 468–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1961). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor-Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinter, R. (2000). “Working” from Home: Why Teenagers Use Instant Messaging: unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, R. (Ed.). (1990). Groups that Work (and Some that Don’t): Creating Conditions for Effective Teamwork. San Francisco, California, USA: Jossey-Bass Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, A.P. (1962). Handbook of small group research. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haywood, M. (1998). Managing virtual teams: practical techniques for high-technology project man-agers. Boston: Artech House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, C, and Luff, P. (1991). Disembodied Conduct: Communication Through Video in a Multi-Media Office Environment. Paper presented at the CHI’91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, C, and Luff, P. (1992). Collaboration and control. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1,65–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G.C. (1950). The human group. New York,: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (1990). The Technology of Team Navigation. In J. Galegher and R. Kraut (Eds.), Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilgen, D.R. (1999). Teams Embedded In Organizations. American Psychologist, 54, 129–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I.L. (1972). Victims of groupthink; a psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes. Boston,: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzenbach, J.R., and Smith, D.K. (1993). The wisdom of teams: creating the high-performance organization. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendon, A. (1977). Studies in the behavior of social interaction. Bloomington: Indiana University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinney, S., and Panko, R. (1996). Project Teams: Profiles and member perceptions. Paper presented at the 29th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, Maui, HI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R.E., and Attewell, P. (1997). Media use and organizational knowledge: Electronic mail in a global corporation. In S. Kiesler (Ed.), Research Milestones on the Information Highway (pp. xvi, 463). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving social conflicts: Selected papers on group dynamics 1935–1946. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science; selected theoretical papers. ([1st] ed.) New York,: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier, N., and Solem, N. (1952). The Contribution of a Discussion Leader to the Quality of Group Thinking: The Effective Use of Minority Opinions. Human Relations, 5, 277–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mark, G., Grudin, J., and Poltrock, S. (1999). Meeting at the Desktop: An Empirical Study of Virtually Collocated Teams. Paper presented at the Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW ’99), Copenhagen, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, J. (1990). Time Matters in Groups. In J. Galegher and R. Kraut (Eds.), Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, J. (1997). Small Group research, that once and future field: An interpretation of the past with an eye for the future. Group Dynamics, 1(7–27).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mink, O.G., Mink, B.P., and Owen, K.Q. (1987). Groups at work. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohrman, S.A., Cohen, S.G., Mohrman, A.M., and University of Southern California. Center for Effective Organizations. (1995). Designing team-based organizations: new forms for knowledge work. (1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, B., Whittaker, S., and Bradner, E. (2000). Interaction and Outeraction: Instant Messaging in Action. Paper presented at the Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Seattle, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, G.M., and Olson, J.S. (2000). Distance Matters. Transactions on Computer Human Interaction (TOCHI), 15, 139–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillip, J., and Dunphy, D. (1959). Developmental trends in small groups. Sociometry, 22, 162–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poltrock, S., and Engelbeck, G. (1997). Requirements for a Virtual Collocation Environment. Paper presented at the Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP ’97), Phoenix, Arizona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabbie, J., M. (1991). Determinants of Instrumental Intra-group Cooperation. In R.A. Hinde and J. Groebel (Eds.), Cooperation and Prosocial Behaviour (pp. 238–262). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayles, L.R. (1958). Behavior of industrial work groups: prediction and control. New York,: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sproull, L., and Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, I.D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York,: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundstrom, E., DeMuse, K., and Futrell, D. (1990). Workteams: Applications and Effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45(2), 120–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundstrom, E.D., and Sundstrom, M.G. (1986). Work places: the psychology of the physical environment in offices and factories. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London; New York: Published in cooperation with European Association of Experimental Social Psychology by Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, J., Isaacs, E., and Rua, M. (1994). Supporting distributed groups with a Montage of Lightweight interactions. Paper presented at the Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW'94).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J.W, and Kelley, H.H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York,: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, C.R., and Guest, R.H. (1952). The man on the assembly line. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K.E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. (1d ed.) New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bradner, E. (2003). Computer Mediated Communication Among Teams: What are “Teams” and How are They “Virtual”?. In: Lueg, C., Fisher, D. (eds) From Usenet to CoWebs. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0057-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0057-7_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-532-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0057-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics