Skip to main content

Legal Sufficiency of Testing Processes

  • Conference paper
Safe Comp 96

Abstract

Software processes are executed for a purpose: to satisfy a set of process requirements and to meet process constraints [1]. This paper shows that there is a critical set of process constraints, often considered only implicitly or even ignored, that are derived externally from social expectations. This paper suggests an approach to determining this set of process constraints and a basic method for their consideration during safety-critical testing process design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Osterweil, Leon. Software Processes are Software Too, 9th Int’l Conf. on Soft. Eng., 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Leveson, Turner, An Investigation of the Therac-25 Accidents, IEEE Computer, Vol 26, No. 7, July, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nelson and Winter, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hamlet, Are We Testing for True Reliability?, IEEE Software, July 1992

    Google Scholar 

  5. Prosser, Handbook of the Law of Torts, 4th Ed., West Publ., St Paul, Minn., 1971

    Google Scholar 

  6. Blyth v. Birmingham Waterworks Co., 1856, 11 Ex. 781, 784, 156 Eng. Rep. 1047.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Glendon, Gordon, Osakwe, Comparative Legal Traditions, West Publ. Co., St. Paul, MN., 1994

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gemignani, Law and the Computer, CBI Publ., Boston, MA., 1981

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lapp, Powers, Computer-aided Synthesis of Fault-Trees, IEEE Trans, on Reliability, April 1977, page 2.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Leveson, Harvey, Analyzing Software Safety, IEEE Trans, on Soft. Eng., Vol. SE-9, No. 5, September, 1983, page 569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fossett, The Development of Negligence in Computer Law, No. Ky. L. R. 14 No. 2, pps 289–310 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Weyuker, On Testing Non-Testable Programs, The Computer Journal, Vol 25, No. 4, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  13. Parnas, Evaluation of Safety-Critical Software, CACM Vol. 33, No. 6, June 1990

    Google Scholar 

  14. ISO 9000–3: 1991 (E), Quality management and quality assurance standards - Part 3: Guidelines for the application of ISO 9001 to the development, supply and maintenance of software.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Turner, C.S., Richardson, D.J., King, J.L. (1997). Legal Sufficiency of Testing Processes. In: Schoitsch, E. (eds) Safe Comp 96. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0937-2_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0937-2_35

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-76070-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0937-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics