Skip to main content

Testing Principal Component Representations for Faces

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Perspectives in Neural Computing ((PERSPECT.NEURAL))

Abstract

A variety of experimental results indicate that the human visual system processes faces at least to some extent holistically, rather than by analysing individual features such as nose and eyes. Principal Components Analysis (PCA) of face images, which is widely used in engineering approaches to face identification, produces an inherently global representation. We investigate the psychological plausibility of this representation, looking at correlations with human perceptions of memorability and similarity. We show that transformation of faces to an average shape prior to PCA improves correlations with human ratings

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baddeley RJ and Hancock PJB, A statistical analysis of natural images matches psychophysically derived orientation tuning curves. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 1991, 246: 219–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bartlett MS and Sejnowski TJ, Independent component analysis of face images: a representation for face recognition. Proceedings of the 4th Annual Joint Symposium on Neural Computation, Pasadena, CA. La Jolla, CA: Institute for Neural Computation 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Biederman, I, Neural and psychophysical analysis of object and face recognition, Talk at NATO ASI: Face recognition, from theory to application, Stirling, July 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bruce V, Hanna E, Dench N, Healy P and Burton AM, The importance of ‘mass’ in line drawings of faces, Applied Cognitive Psychology 1992, 6: 619628

    Google Scholar 

  5. Craw I and Cameron P, Parameterising images for recognition and reconstruction In Mowforth P, editor, Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference, London: Springer Verlag, 1991 pages 367–370

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dakin SC, The visual representation of texture, PhD thesis, Department of Psychology, University of Stirling, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Galper RE and Hochberg J, Repetition memory for photographs of faces, American Journal of Psychology 1971, 84: 351–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hancock PJB, Bruce V and Burton AM, A comparison of two computer-based face identification systems with human perceptions of faces, Submitted to Vision Research 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hancock PJB, Burton AM, and Bruce V, Face processing: human perception and principal components analysis, Memory and Cognition 1996, 24: 26–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lades M, Vorbrûggen JC, Buhman J, Lage J, von der Malsburg C, Wûrtz RP and Konen W, Distortion invariant object recognition in the dynamic link architecture, IEEE Transactions on Computers 1993, 42: 300–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Moses Y, Adini Y and Ullman S, Face recognition: the problem of compensating for changes in illumination direction, Proceedings of ECCV-94, Stockholm, 2–6 May 1994, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1994, pages 286–296.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sanger TD, Optimal unsupervised learning in a single-layer linear feedforward neural network, Neural Networks 1989, 2: 459–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Thompson P, Magaret Thatcher: A new illusion, Perception 1980, 9:483— 484

    Google Scholar 

  14. Turk M and Pentland A, Eigenfaces for recognition, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1991 3: 71–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Vokey JR and Read JD, Familiarity, memorability and the effect of typicality on the recognition of faces. Memory and Cognition 1992, 20: 291–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Watt RJ, A computational examination of image segmentation and the initial stages of human vision, Perception 1994, 23: 383–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hancock, P.J.B., Bruce, V., Burton, A.M. (1998). Testing Principal Component Representations for Faces. In: Bullinaria, J.A., Glasspool, D.W., Houghton, G. (eds) 4th Neural Computation and Psychology Workshop, London, 9–11 April 1997. Perspectives in Neural Computing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1546-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1546-5_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-76208-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-1546-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics