Abstract
This chapter is concerned with how implicit, nonverbal cues support coordinated action between two partners. Recently, neuroscientists have started uncovering the brain mechanisms involved in how people make predictions about other people’s behavioural goals and intentions through action observation. To date, however, only a small number of studies have addressed how the involvement of a task partner influences the planning and control of one’s own purposeful action. Here, we review three studies of cooperative action between human and robot partners that address the nature of predictive and reactive motor control in cooperative action. We conclude with a model which achieves motor coordination by task partners each adjusting their actions on the basis of previous trial outcome.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Danchin, E., Giraldeau, L.A., Valone, T.J., Wagner, R.H.: Public information: From noisy neighbors to cultural evolution. Science 305, 487–491 (2004)
Herrmann, E., Call, J., Hernandez-Lloreda, M.V., Hare, B., Tomasello, M.: Humans have evolved specialized skills of social cognition: The cultural intelligence hypothesis. Science 317, 1360–1366 (2007)
Brosnan, S.F., Bshary, R.: Cooperation and deception: from evolution to mechanisms introduction. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B, Biol. Sci. 365, 2593–2598 (2010)
Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., Knoblich, G.: Joint action: bodies and minds moving together. Trends Cogn. Sci. 10, 70–76 (2006)
Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., Prinz, W.: Representing others’ actions: Just like one’s own? Cognition 88, B11–B21 (2003)
Tsai, C.C., Kuo, W.J., Jing, J.T., Hung, D.L., Tzeng, O.J.L.: A common coding framework in self-other interaction: evidence from joint action task. Exp. Brain Res. 175, 353–362 (2006)
Knoblich, G., Sebanz, N.: The social nature of perception and action. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 15, 99–104 (2006)
Rizzolatti, G., Sinigaglia, C.: The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: interpretations and misinterpretations. Nat. Rev., Neurosci. 11, 264–274 (2010)
Bosga, J., Meulenbroek, R.G.J.: Joint-action coordination of redundant force contributions in a virtual lifting task. Mot. Control 11, 235–258 (2007)
Newman-Norlund, R.D., van Schie, H.T., van Zuijlen, A.M.J., Bekkering, H.: The mirror neuron system is more active during complementary compared with imitative action. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 817–818 (2007)
Reed, K., Peshkin, M., Hartmann, M.J., Grabowecky, M., Patton, J., Vishton, P.M.: Haptically linked dyads—are two motor-control systems better than one? Psychol. Sci. 17, 365–366 (2006)
Faisal, A.A., Selen, L.P.J., Wolpert, D.M.: Noise in the nervous system. Nat. Rev., Neurosci. 9, 292–303 (2008)
Johansson, R.S., Westling, G.: Programmed and triggered actions to rapid load changes during precision grip. Exp. Brain Res. 71, 72–86 (1988)
Darton, K., Lippold, O.C., Shahani, M., Shahani, U.: Long-latency spinal reflexes in humans. J. Neurophysiol. 53, 1604–1618 (1985)
Wolpert, D.M., Ghahramani, Z.: Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nat. Neurosci. 3, 1212–1217 (2000)
Kawato, M.: Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 9(6), 718–727 (1999)
Thoroughman, K.A., Shadmehr, R.: Learning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives. Nature 407, 742–747 (2000)
Vorberg, D., Wing, A.: Modeling variability and dependence in timing. In: Keele, S., Heuer, H. (eds.) Handbook of Perception and Action, pp. 181–262. Academic Press, New York (1996)
Behrens, T.E.J., Hunt, L.T., Woolrich, M.W., Rushworth, M.F.S.: Associative learning of social value. Nature 456, 245–249 (2008)
Kon, H., Miyake, Y.: An analysis and modeling of mutual synchronization process in cooperative tapping. J. Hum. Interface Soc. 7, 61–70 (2005)
Repp, B.H., Keller, P.E.: Sensorimotor synchronization with adaptively timed sequences. Hum. Mov. Sci. 27, 423–456 (2008)
Schuch, S., Tipper, S.P.: On observing another person’s actions: Influences of observed inhibition and errors. Percept. Psychophys. 69, 828–837 (2007)
Rabbitt, P.M.A.: Errors and error correction in choice-response tasks. J. Exp. Psychol. 71, 264–672 (1966)
Notebaert, W., Houtman, F., Van Opstal, F., Gevers, W., Fias, W., Verguts, T.: Post-error slowing: An orienting account. Cognition 111, 275–279 (2009)
Flash, T., Hogan, N.: The coordination of arm movements—an experimentally confirmed mathematical-model. J. Neurosci. 5, 1688–1703 (1985)
Ito, S., Yuasa, H., Ito, M., Hosoe, S.: On an adaptation in distributed system based on a gradient dynamics. In: Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Tokyo, Japan (1999)
Murian, A., Deschamps, T., Bourbousson, J., Temprado, J.J.: Influence of an exhausting muscle exercise on bimanual coordination stability and attentional demands. Neurosci. Lett. 432, 64–68 (2008)
Griffiths, D., Tipper, S.P.: Priming of reach trajectory when observing actions: Hand-centred effects. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 62, 2450–2470 (2009)
Endo, S., Bracewell, R.M., Wing, A.M.: Learning cooperative object lifting using haptic feedbacks (submitted)
Quinn, M., Smith, L., Mayley, G., Husbands, P.: Evolving controllers for a homogeneous system of physical robots: structured cooperation with minimal sensors. Philos. Trans. R. Soc., Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 361, 2321–2343 (2003)
Vaughan, R.T., Støy, K., Sukhatme, G.S., Mataric, M.J.: Go ahead; make my day: Robot conflict resolution by aggressive competition. Anim. Animats 6, 491–500 (2000)
Stone, P., Veloso, M.: Task decomposition, dynamic role assignment, and low-bandwidth communication for real-time strategic teamwork. Artif. Intell. 110, 241–273 (1999)
Di Paolo, E.A., Rohde, M., Iizuka, H.: Sensitivity to social contingency or stability of interaction? Modelling the dynamics of perceptual crossing. New Ideas Psychol. 26, 278–294 (2008)
Thompson, E., Varela, F.J.: Radical embodiment: neural dynamics and consciousness. Trends Cogn. Sci. 5, 418–425 (2001)
Tognoli, E., Lagarde, J., deGuzman, G.C., Kelso, J.A.S.: The phi complex as a neuromarker of human social coordination. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, pp. 8190–8195 (2007)
van Ulzen, N.R., Lamoth, C.J.C., Daffertshofer, A., Semin, G.R., Beek, P.J.: Characteristics of instructed and uninstructed interpersonal coordination while walking side-by-side. Neurosci. Lett. 432, 88–93 (2008)
Zivotofsky, A.Z., Hausdorff, J.M.: The sensory feedback mechanisms enabling couples to walk synchronously: An initial investigation. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation 4(28) (2007)
Chartrand, T.L., Bargh, J.A.: The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 76, 893–910 (1999)
Wilson, M., Knoblich, G.: The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychol. Bull. 131, 460–473 (2005)
Richardson, M.J., Marsh, K.L., Isenhower, R.W., Goodman, J.R.L., Schmidt, R.C.: Rocking together: Dynamics of intentional and unintentional interpersonal coordination. Hum. Mov. Sci. 26, 867–891 (2007)
Neda, Z., Ravasz, E., Brechet, Y., Vicsek, T., Barabasi, A.L.: The sound of many hands clapping—tumultuous applause can transform itself into waves of synchronized clapping. Nature 403, 849–850 (2000)
Oullier, O., de Guzman, G.C., Jantzen, K.J., Lagarde, J., Kelso, J.A.S.: Social coordination dynamics: Measuring human bonding. Soc. Neurosci. 3, 178–192 (2008)
Schmidt, R.C., Bienvenu, M., Fitzpatrick, P.A., Amazeen, P.G.: A comparison of intra- and interpersonal interlimb coordination: Coordination breakdowns and coupling strength. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 24, 884–900 (1998)
Felmlee, D.H., Greenberg, D.F.: A dynamic systems model of dyadic interaction. J. Math. Sociol. 23, 155–180 (1999)
Vorberg, D., Schulze, H.H.: Linear phase-correction in synchronization: Predictions; parameter estimation; and simulations. J. Math. Psychol. 46, 56–87 (2002)
Endo, S., Wing, A.M., Diedrichsen, J.: Joint adaptation in cooperative action (submitted)
Braun, D.A., Ortega, P.A., Wolpert, D.M.: Nash equilibria in multi-agent motor interactions. PLoS Comput. Biol. 5(8), 1–8 (2009)
Brownlow, S., Dixon, A.R., Egbert, C.A., Radcliffe, R.D.: Perception of movement and dancer characteristics from point-light displays of dance. Psychol. Rec. 47, 411–421 (1997)
Blake, R., Shiffrar, M.: Perception of human motion. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 58, 47–73 (2007)
Shim, J., Carlton, J.G.: Perception of kinematic characteristics in the motion of lifted weight. J. Mot. Behav. 29(2), 131–146 (1997)
Stanley, J., Gowen, E., Miall, R.C.: Effects of agency on movement interference during observation of a moving dot stimulus. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 33, 915–926 (2007)
Gazzola, V., Rizzolatti, G., Wicker, B., Keysers, C.: The anthropomorphic brain: The mirror neuron system responds to human and robotic actions. NeuroImage 35, 1674–1684 (2007)
Kilner, J.M., Paulignan, Y., Blakemore, S.J.: An interference effect of observed biological movement on action. Curr. Biol. 13, 522–525 (2003)
Grammer, K., Kruck, K., Juette, A., Fink, B.: Non-verbal behavior as courtship signals: The role of control and choice in selecting partners. Evol. Hum. Behav. 21, 371–390 (2000)
Janovic, T., Ivkovic, V., Nazor, D., Grammer, K., Jovanovic, V.: Empathy, communication, deception. Coll. Antropol. 27, 809–822 (2003)
Isenhower, R.M., Marsh, K.L., Carello, C., Baron, R.M., Richardson, R.M.: The specificity of intrapersonal and interpersonal affordance boundaries: intrinsic versus extrinsic metrics. In: Heft, H., Marsh, K.L. (eds.) Studies in Perception and Action, VIII, pp. 54–58. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (2005)
Acknowledgements
This work was partly supported by the ImmerSence project within the 6th Framework Programme of the European Union, FET—Presence Initiative, contract number IST-2006-027141, see also www.immersence.info and by BBSRC grant BB/F010087/1 to AMW.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Endo, S., Evrard, P., Kheddar, A., Wing, A.M. (2012). Human-Robot Adaptive Control of Object-Oriented Action. In: Peer, A., Giachritsis, C. (eds) Immersive Multimodal Interactive Presence. Springer Series on Touch and Haptic Systems. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2754-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2754-3_6
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-2753-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2754-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)