Skip to main content

Towards the Total Quality Interface — Applying Taguchi TQM Techniques within the LUCID Method

  • Conference paper
People and Computers XI

Abstract

Juran defines quality as being ‘fit for purpose or use’. It follows clearly from this that an effective interface is an essential ingredient in a quality software product. Whilst the discipline of Human Computer Interaction is maturing quickly, there still remains only limited support for designing in quality rather than evaluating it afterwards. In this paper the authors present the results of a pilot study within the first stage in the development of the LUCID (Logical User Centred Interface Design) method which attempts to integrate a number of human factor tools within a quality framework. Particularly they focus on the phases which adopt the Taguchi Method for designing quality into products and processes. By adopting such techniques within a practical example, the authors demonstrate how the use of a scientific experimental design strategy, together with conventional statistical tools can assist the selection of the optimum user interface.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allison, G., Catterall, B., Dowd, M., Galer, M., Maguire, M. & Taylor, B. (1992), Human Factors Tools for Designers of Information Technology Products, in M. Galer, S. Harker & J. Ziegler (eds.), “Methods and Tools in User Centred Design for Information Technology”, Elsevier Science, pp. 13–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevan, N. (1995), “Measuring Usability as Quality of Use”, Software Quality Journal 4 (2), 115–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bias, R. G. (1994), The Pluralistic Usability Walkthrough: Co-ordinated Empathies, in J. Nielsen & R. L. Mack (eds.), “Usability Inspection Methods”, John Wiley & Sons, pp. 65–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, B. G. & Plunkett, J. J. (1990), Managing Quality,Philip Allan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, A., Sweeney, M. T. & Maguire, M. C. (1993), A Survey of Usability Engineering Within the European IT Industry — Current Practice and Needs, in J. Alty, D. Diaper & S. Guest (eds.), “People and Computers VIII (Proceedings of HCI’93)”, Cambridge University Press, pp. 81–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartson, H. R. & Boehm-Davis, D. (1993), “User Interface Development Processes and Methodologies”, Behaviour & Information Technology 12 (2), 98–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewett, T. (1986), Role of Iterative Evaluation, in M. D. Harrison & A. Monk (eds.), “People and Computers: Designing for Usability (Proceedings of HCI’86)”, Cambridge University Press, pp. 197–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G. I., Clegg, C. W. & Ravden, S. J. (1989), “Towards a Practical Method of User Interface Evaluation”, Applied Ergonomics 20 (4), 255–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juran, J. M. (1979), Quality Control Handbook,3rd edition, McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khaw, J. F. C., Lim, B. S. & Lim, L. E. N. (1993), Using Taguchi Method for the Optimal Design of Neural Networks, in “Proceedings of 5th Workshop on Neural Networks”, SCS, pp. 307–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, K. Y. & Long, J. (1994), The MUSE Method for Usability Engineering, Cambridge Series on Human–Computer Interaction, Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew, D. J. (1992), Principles and Guidelines in Software and User Interface Design,Prentice–Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinley, J. & Hunter, G. (1992), SCOPE Catalogue of Software Quality Assessment Procedures 3: Usability Section,Verilog.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millington, D. & Stapleton, J. (1995), “Developing a RAD Standard”, IEEE Software 12 (5), 54–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J. (1993), Usability Engineering,Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J. (1995), Getting Usability Used, in K. Nordby, P. H. Helmersen, D. J. Gilmore & S. A. Amessen (eds.), “Human–Computer Interaction — INTERACT’95: Proceedings of the Fifth IFIP Conference on Human–Computer Interaction”, Chapman & Hall, pp. 312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D. & Fitter, M. (1992), “Supportive Evaluation Methodology: A Method to Facilitate System Development”, Behaviour & Information Technology 11 (3), 151–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, J. (1994), Handbook of Usability Testing,John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackel, B. (1986), Ergonomics in Designing for Usability, in M. D. Harrison & A. Monk (eds.), “People and Computers: Designing for Usability (Proceedings of HCI’86)”, Cambridge University Press, pp./14 64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. & Dunckley, L. (1995), Human Factors in Software Development — Current Practice Relating to User Centred Design in the UK, in K. Nordby, P. H. Helmersen, D. J. Gilmore & S. A. Arnessen (eds.), “Human-Computer Interaction — INTERACT’95: Proceedings of the Fifth IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction”, Chapman & Hall, pp. 380–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taguchi, G. (1986), Introduction to Quality Engineering,Asian Productivity Organisation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turton, B. C. H. (1994), “Optimisation of Genetic Algorithms using the Taguchi Method”, Journal of Systems Engineering 4 (3), 121–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, A. I., Pircher, P. A., Shewmake, D. T. & Kersten, M. L. (1985), “Developing Interactive Information Systems with the User Software Engineering Method”, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 12 (2), 326–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wharton, C., Rieman, J., Lewis, C. & Polson, P. (1994), The Cognitive Walkthrough Method: A Practitioners Guide, in J. Nielsen & R. L. Mack (eds.), “Usability Inspection Methods”, John Wiley & Sons, pp. 105–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteside, J., Bennett, J. & Holtzblatt, K. (1988), Usability Engineering: Our Experience and Evolution, in M. Helander (ed.), “Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction”, North-Holland, pp. 791–817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wixon, D., Jones, S., Tse, L. & Casaday, G. (1994), Inspection and Design Reviews; Frameworks, History and Reflection, in J. Nielsen & R. L. Mack (eds.), “Usability Inspection Methods”, John Wiley & Sons, pp. 79–104.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag London

About this paper

Cite this paper

Smith, A., Dunckley, L. (1996). Towards the Total Quality Interface — Applying Taguchi TQM Techniques within the LUCID Method. In: Sasse, M.A., Cunningham, R.J., Winder, R.L. (eds) People and Computers XI. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3588-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3588-3_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-76069-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-3588-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics