Skip to main content

Separating User Knowledge of Domain and Device: A Framework

  • Conference paper
People and Computers XII
  • 134 Accesses

Abstract

A framework for modelling user-device interaction is presented. Models constructed with the framework explicitly separate 1) what the operator knows about the work (domain) being carried out, from 2) what the operator knows about the state of the devices used to carry out that work. Using an illustration from Air Traffic Management (ATM), the value of such separation is shown, for the diagnosis of operator behaviour that leads to system ineffectiveness. The design implications of using such worksystem models, in conjunction with domain models, are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, J.R. (1993) Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, P.J. and Teasdale, J.D. (1993) Affect, Cognition and Change: Remodelling depressive thought, Essays in Cognitive Psychology Series, Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blandford, A. and Young, R.M. (1993) “Developing runnable user models: separating the problem solving techniques from the domain knowledge”, in People and Computers VIII (Proceedings of the HCI’93 Conference)“, eds. J.L. Alty, D. Diaper and S. Guest, Cambridge University Press, 111–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacciabue, P.C., Decortis, F., Drozdowicz, B., Masson, M., and Nordvik, J-P. (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • COSIMO: A cognitive simulation model of human decision making and behaviour in accident management of complex plants“. IEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 22 (5), 1058–1074

    Google Scholar 

  • Card, S.K., Moran, T.P. and Newell, A. (1983) The psychology of human-computer interaction. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, J. (1992) “Domain analysis of air traffic management”, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Decision Action Systems in Complex Organisations, University of Oxford. IEE: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, J., Salter, I. and Zekrullahi, S. (1994) “A domain analysis of air traffic management work can be used to rationalise interface design issues”, in People and Computers IX (Proceedings of the HCI’94 Conference), eds. G. Cockton, S.W. Draper and G.R.S. Weir, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G. (1993) “Beyond Human Computer Interaction: Designing Useful and Usable Computational Environments” in People and Computers VIII (Proceedings of the HCI’93 Conference).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J.H., Holyoak, K.J., Nisbett, R.E. and Thagard, P.R. (1987) Induction, processes of inference, learning and discovery. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moray, N., Lootsteen, P. and Pajak, J. (1986) “Acquisition of Process Control Skills, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vol SMC-16, No.4, July/August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A. (1990) Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, J. and Vicente, K.J. (1990) “Ecological Interfaces: A Technological Imperative in High Tech Systems?”, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 2 (2), 93–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reisner, P. (1984) “Formal grammar as a tool for analysing ease of use: some fundamental concepts”, in Human Factors in Computer Systems, eds. J.C. Thomas and M.L. Schneider, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieman, J., Lewis, C., Young, R.M. and Poison, P.G. (1994) “”Why is a raven like a writing desk?“ Lessons in interface consistency and analogical reasoning from two cognitive architectures”, in Proceedings of CHI’94: Human Factors in Computing Systems, eds. B. Adelson, S. Dumais and J. Olseon, ACM Press, 438–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutcliffe, A.G., Benyon, D. and van Assche, F. (eds.) (1996) Domain Knowledge for Interactive System Design. Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmer, P. and Long, J. (1996) “Integrating domain and worksystem models: an illustration from air traffic management”, in Domain Knowledge for Interactive System Design, A.G. Sutcliffe, D. Benyon and F. van Assche (eds. ), Chapman and Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, R.M., Green, T.R.G. and Simon, T. (1989) “Programmable User Models for Predictive Evaluation of Interface Designs” in Proceedings of CHI’ 89: Human Factors in Computer Systems, eds. K. Bice and C.H. Lewis, ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, D.D. and Hollnagel, E. (1987) “Mapping cognitive demands in complex problem-solving worlds”, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 26, 257275.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag London

About this paper

Cite this paper

Timmer, P., Long, J. (1997). Separating User Knowledge of Domain and Device: A Framework. In: Thimbleby, H., O’Conaill, B., Thomas, P.J. (eds) People and Computers XII. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3601-9_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3601-9_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-76172-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-3601-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics