Abstract
As computer graphical user interfaces (GUIs) are loaded with increasingly greater numbers of objects, researchers in HCI are forced to look for the next step in constructing user interface. In this paper, we examine the effects of employing more ‘natural’ representations in GUIs. In particular, we experimentally assess the impact of object form (2D iconic vs. 3D realistic) and layout (regular vs. ecological) have on target acquisition time. Results indicate that both form and layout significantly affect performance; subjects located targets more quickly when using interfaces with 3D objects and ecological layouts than they do with 2D objects and regular layouts. An interface with an ecological layout, realistic objects, or both may be an improvement over traditional interfaces.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Benyon, D. Höök, K. (1997), Navigation in Information Spaces: Supporting the Individual, in S. Howard, J. Hammond G. K. Lindgaard (eds.), Human-Computer Interaction — INTERACT’97: Proceedings of the Fifth IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Chapman Hall, pp. 39–45.
Bolt, R. (1978), Spatial Data Management System, Final Technical Report, US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.
Christ, R. (1975), “Review and Analysis of Color Coding Research for Visual Displays”, Human Factors 17 (6), 542–570.
Cole, I. (1982), Human Aspects of Office Filing: Implications for the Electronic Office, in Proceedings of the Human Factors Society — 26th Annual Meeting, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, pp. 59–63.
Findlay, J., Davies, S., Kentridge, R., Lambert, A. Kelly, J. (1988), Optimum Display Arrangements for Presenting Visual Reminders, in D. M. Jones R. Winder (eds.), People and Computers IV (Proceedings of HCI’88), Cambridge University Press, pp. 453–64.
Fitts, P. (1954), “The Information Capacity of the Human Motor System in Controlling Amplitude of Movement”, British Journal of Educational Psychology 47 (6), 381–91.
Hasher, L. Zacks, R. (1979), “Automatic and Effortful Processes in Memory”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 108, 356–88.
Hess, S., Detweiler, M. Ellis, R. (1984), The Effects of Display Layout on Monitoring and Updating System States, in Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38th Annual Meeting, pp.1336–40.
Jones, W. Dumais, S. (1986), “The Spatial Metaphor for User Interfaces: Experimental Tests of Reference by Location versus Name”, ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems 4 (1), 42–63.
Kaptelinin, V. (1993), Item Recognition in Menu Selection: The Effect of Practice, in S. Ashlund, K. Mullet, A. Henderson, E. Hollnagel T. White (eds.), Proceedings of INTERCHI’93, ACM Press, pp. 183–84.
Lansdale, M., Scrivener, S. Woodcock, A. (1996), “Developing Practice with Theory in HCI: Applying Models of Spatial Cognition for the Design of Pictorial Databases”, International Journal of Human–Computer Studies 44, 777–799.
Lansdale, M., Simpson, M. Stroud, T. (1987), Comparing Words and Icons as Cue Enrichers in an Information Retrieval Task, in H.-J. Bullinger B. Shackel (eds.), Proceedings of INTERACT’87 — Second IFIP Conference on Human–Computer Interaction, Elsevier Science, pp. 911–6.
Malone, T. (1983), “How Do People Organize Their Desks? Implications for the Design of Office Information Systems”, ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems 1 (1), 99–112.
Mandler, J., Seegmiller, D. Day, J. (1977), “On the Coding of Spatial Information”, Memory and Çognition 5, 10–16.
Moyes, J. (1995), Putting Icons in Context: The Influence of Contextual Information on the Usability of Icons, PhD thesis, University of Glasgow.
Reeves, B. Nass, C. (1996), The Media Equation,Cambridge University Press.
Rothkopf, E., Fisher, D. Billington, M. (1982), “Effects on Spatial Context During Acquisition on the Recall of Attrivutive Information”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 8 (2), 126–138.
Selker, T., May, I. Zhai, S. (1997), “Representation Matters: Spatial Interface can Facilitate Target Acquisition”, Presentation at the 6th International World Wide Web Conference.
van der Veer, G. (1989), “Individual Differences and the User Interface”, Ergonomics 32 (11), 1431–1449.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer-Verlag London
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ark, W., Dryer, D.C., Selker, T., Zhai, S. (1998). Representation Matters: The Effect of 3D Objects and a Spatial Metaphor in a Graphical User Interface. In: Johnson, H., Nigay, L., Roast, C. (eds) People and Computers XIII. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3605-7_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3605-7_13
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-76261-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-3605-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive