Skip to main content

Abstract

This paper propose a multi-agent system, called ADEA (Agents-based DEsign Activity Analysis), to validate some properties of a theory for design activity reasoning. In this theory, two axioms are proposed to govern design activity. Axiom 1 deals with relations between the descriptors of an artefact: means and effects. Axiom 2 deals with actors and their roles in design activity. From the two defined axioms, some properties of the design activity theoretical model have been shown. ADEA’s platform design lays explicitly on the properties drawn from the proposed design activity theory. The originality of ADEA is the reactive behaviour of autonomous and distributed agents following the evolution of the design space. Each agent has a role relatively to the proposed theory and is both cognitive and reactive. ADEA permits to show the properties of design activity as co-evolution of the problem and solution, emergence of design parameters, rules and real resulting parameters, temporal continuity of design activity, knowledge computing and reactivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bucciarelli L (1994) Designing engineers. The MIT press Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Cernuzzi L, Cossentino M, Zambonelli F (2005) Process models for agent-based development. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 18(2), 205-222

    Google Scholar 

  • Chira O, Chira C, Roche T, Tormey D, Brennan A (2006) An agent-based approach to knowledge management in distributed design. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 17(6), 737-750

    Google Scholar 

  • Choulier D (2010) Towards a new theory for design activity reasoning. First International Conference on Design Creativity, (ICDC2010), Kobe (Japan), November 29- December 1, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross N (2006) Designerly Ways of Knowing. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Astous P, Detienne F, Visser W, Robillard PN (2004) Changing our view on design evaluation meetings methodology: a study of software technical review meetings. Design Studies Vol 25 N°6 pp 625 – 655

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorst K, Cross N (2001) Creativity in the design process: co evolution of problem solution, Design Studies Vol 22 N°5 pp 425 – 438

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert C, Stacey M (2001) Designing in the context of fashion: designing the fashion context, in designing in context, P. Lloyd, H. Christiaans (editors), Proceedings of design thinking research symposium 5, Delft university press

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferber J (1999) Multi-Agent Systems. An Introduction to Distributed Artificial Intelligence. Addison Wesley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fougères A-J (2004) Agents to cooperate in distributed design. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetic, The Hague, Netherlands, pp. 2629-2634

    Google Scholar 

  • Fougères A-J (2011) Modelling and simulation of complex systems: an approach based on multi-level agents. International Journal of Computer Science Issues, 8(6): 8-17

    Google Scholar 

  • Gero JS, Kannengiesser U (2002) The situated Function Behaviour framework. Design Studies Vol. 25 - 4, pp 373-392

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt G, Smolkov M (2006) Variances in the impact of visual stimuli on design problems solving performance. Design Studies Vol 27 N° 5 p 549 – 570

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadeli T, Valckenaers P, Kollingbaum M, Van Brussel H (2004) Multi-agent coordination and control using stigmergy. Computers in Industry, 53, 75–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel A, Weil B (2009) CK design theory: an advanced formulation. Res Eng Design 19:181–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings NR (2000) On agent-based software engineering. Artificial Intelligence, 117, 277-296

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitão P (2008) Agent-based distributed manufacturing control: A state-of-the-art survey. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2008.09.005

    Google Scholar 

  • Marik V, McFarlane D (2005) Industrial adoption of agent-based technologies. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 20(1), 27-35

    Google Scholar 

  • Ming Chao K, Norman P, Anane R, James A (2002) An agent-based approach to engineering design. Computers in Industry, 48(1), 17-27

    Google Scholar 

  • Monostori L, Vancza J, Kumara SRT (2006) Agent-Based Systems for Manufacturing. Annals of the CIRP, 55(2), 697-720

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon SK, Simpson TW, Kumara SRT (2009) An agent-based recommender system for developing customized families of products. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 20(6), 649–659

    Google Scholar 

  • Nahm YE, Ishikawa H (2005) A hybrid multiagent system architecture for enterprise integration using computer networks. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 21(3), 217-234

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrosi E, Fougères A-J (2011) Optimization of product configuration assisted by fuzzy agents. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, Vol. 5, N° 1, pp. 29-44

    Google Scholar 

  • Parunak H, Sauter J, Fleisher M (1999) The RAPPID Project: symbiosis between industrial requirements and MAS research. Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2, 111-140

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen J (1983) Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 13, 257-266

    Google Scholar 

  • Shai O, Reich Y (2004) Infused design. I Theory, Research in Engineering Design, 15(2):93-107

    Google Scholar 

  • Shai O, and Reich Y (2004) Infused design. II Practice, Research in Engineering Design, 15(2):108-121

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen W, Hao Q, Wang S, Li Y, Ghenniwa H (2007) An agent-based service-oriented integration architecture for collaborative intelligent manufacturing. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing. 23, pp. 315-325

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1996) The sciences of artificial. MIT press Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England, Third edition, ISBN 0 262 19374 4 (1st edition 1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Suh NP (2001) Axiomatic design - Advances and applications. MIT, Oxford University press, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomiyama T, Yoshikawa H (1987) Extended General Design Theory, in H. Yoshikawa and E.A. Warman (eds.), Design Theory for CAD, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 95-130

    Google Scholar 

  • Trentesaux D, Dindeleux R, Tahon C (1998) A multicriteria decision support system for dynamic task allocation in a distributed production activity control structure. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf., 11(1), 3–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Valckenaers P, Hadeli K, Saint Germain B, Verstraete P, van Brussel H, (2006) Emergent short-term forecasting through ant colony engineering in coordination and control systems. Advanced Engineering Informatics 20(3), 261–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Valkenburg R, Dorst K (1998) The reflective practice of design teams. Design Studies Vol 19 N°3 pp 249 – 272

    Google Scholar 

  • van Aart C (2005) Organizational Principles for Multiagent Architectures. Birkhauser Verlag, Basel

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinck D (2003) Socio technical complexity: redesigning a shielding wall, in Everyday engineering - An ethnography of design and innovation. Vinck (ed) The MIT press Cambridge, Massachusetts, London 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser W (2006) The cognitive artifacts of designing. Lawrence Erlbaum associates, publishers, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge M (2002) An introduction to multiagent systems. John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss G (1999) Multiagent Systems: A Modern Approach to Distributed Artificial Intelligence. The MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alain-Jérôme Fougères .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fougères, AJ., Choulier, D., Ostrosi, E. (2013). ADEA: A Multiagent System for Design Activity Analysis. In: Stjepandić, J., Rock, G., Bil, C. (eds) Concurrent Engineering Approaches for Sustainable Product Development in a Multi-Disciplinary Environment. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4426-7_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4426-7_42

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4425-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4426-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics