Skip to main content

A Meta-Model for Engineering Analysis in Product Design

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to present a taxonomy model for describing the knowledge of engineering models within an approach which encourages a systematic design in practice. The proposed taxonomy is based on the principles of the axiomatic design approach, structured on four levels of modeling: (1) conceptual (2) mathematical (3) computational and (4) experimental. In practice, the application has shown that it is rarely possible to work through the whole design process in four levels of modeling. However a complete engineering modeling analysis is necessary for a good project management. The proposed framework can be used for the diagnostic of the engineering design process. It captures the knowledge of design engineers through the building models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ashby MF (1999) Materials Selection in Mechanical Design. Butterworth Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albano LD, Suh NP (1992) Axiomatic Approach to Structural Design. Research in Engineering Design, 4:171-183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altshuller G (2002) And suddenly the inventor appeared. Technical Innovation Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarti A, Blessing L (1996) Representing functionality in design. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 10:251-253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekaran B (2005) Representing Function: Relating Functional Representation and Functional Modeling Research Streams. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 19:65–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekaran B, Josephson JR (2000) Function in Device Representation. Engineering with Computers 16(3/4):162–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choulier D (2011) Découvrir et appliquer les outils de TRIZ. Chantier – UTBM, Belfort, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crispin H (1993) Managing engineering design. Longman Scientific & Technical, Harlow, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erden MS, Komoto H, VanBeek TJ, D’Amelio V, Echavarria E, Tomiyama T (2008) A Review of Function Modeling: Approaches and Applications. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 22:147–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erens FJ, Verhulst K (1997) Architectures of Product Families. Computers in Industry 33(2-3):165-178.

    Google Scholar 

  • French MJ (1971) Engineering design: the conceptual stage. Heinemann Educational Books Ltd, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gero JS, Kannengiesser U (2002) The situated Function Behaviour framework. Design Studies 25-4:373-392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirtz J, Stone RB, McAdams DA, Szykman S, Wood KL (2002) A Functional Basis for Engineering Design: Reconciling and Evolving Previous Efforts. Research in Engineering Design 13:65–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubka V, Eder WE (1988) Theory of technical systems. Springer Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiao J, Tseng M. (2000) Fundamentals of product family architecture. Integrated Manufacturing Systems 11(7):469-483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier JRA, Fadel GM (2009) Affordance-based design methods for innovative design, redesign and reverse engineering. Research in Engineering Design 20-4:225-239.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdams D, Stone R, Wood K, (2000) Functional Interdependence and Product Similarity Based on Customer Needs. Journal of Research in Engineering Design 11:1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nomaguchi Y, Taguchi T, Fujita K, (2010) A framework of describing and managing engineering analysis modeling knowledge for design validation. In: Horvath I, Mandorli F, Rusak Z (ed) Proceedings of TMCE 2010 Symposium, April 1-16, Ancona, Italy, 1055-1067.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orloff MA (2003) Inventive thinking through TRIZ. Springer, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otto KN, Wood KL (2001) Product Design Techniques in Reverse Engineering and New Product Development. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl G, Beitz W (1984) Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach. The Design Council, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone RB, Wood K (2000) Development of a Functional Basis for Design. Journal of Mechanical Design 122(4):359–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suh N (1990) Principles of Design. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullman DG (1992) The mechanical design process. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich K, Eppinger SD (1995) Product design development. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch RV, Dixon JR (1992) Representing function, behavior and structure during conceptual design. In : Taylor DL and Stauffer LA (ed.) Design Theory and Methodology American Society of Mechanical Engineers 42:11-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood WH (2009) A computational representation of functions in engineering design. In: Meijers A (ed.) Handbook of philosophy of technology and engineering sciences 543-564, Elsevier, North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshikawa H (1981) General Design Theory and a CAD System, Man-Machine Communication in CADICAM. In: Proceedings of the IFIP WGS.2/5.3 Working Conference 1980 Tokyo, 35-58, North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Egon Ostrosi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ostrosi, E., Choulier, D., Kurth, M. (2013). A Meta-Model for Engineering Analysis in Product Design. In: Stjepandić, J., Rock, G., Bil, C. (eds) Concurrent Engineering Approaches for Sustainable Product Development in a Multi-Disciplinary Environment. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4426-7_47

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4426-7_47

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4425-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4426-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics