Abstract
The goal of this paper is to present a taxonomy model for describing the knowledge of engineering models within an approach which encourages a systematic design in practice. The proposed taxonomy is based on the principles of the axiomatic design approach, structured on four levels of modeling: (1) conceptual (2) mathematical (3) computational and (4) experimental. In practice, the application has shown that it is rarely possible to work through the whole design process in four levels of modeling. However a complete engineering modeling analysis is necessary for a good project management. The proposed framework can be used for the diagnostic of the engineering design process. It captures the knowledge of design engineers through the building models.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ashby MF (1999) Materials Selection in Mechanical Design. Butterworth Heinemann.
Albano LD, Suh NP (1992) Axiomatic Approach to Structural Design. Research in Engineering Design, 4:171-183.
Altshuller G (2002) And suddenly the inventor appeared. Technical Innovation Center.
Chakrabarti A, Blessing L (1996) Representing functionality in design. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 10:251-253.
Chandrasekaran B (2005) Representing Function: Relating Functional Representation and Functional Modeling Research Streams. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 19:65–74.
Chandrasekaran B, Josephson JR (2000) Function in Device Representation. Engineering with Computers 16(3/4):162–177.
Choulier D (2011) Découvrir et appliquer les outils de TRIZ. Chantier – UTBM, Belfort, France.
Crispin H (1993) Managing engineering design. Longman Scientific & Technical, Harlow, England.
Erden MS, Komoto H, VanBeek TJ, D’Amelio V, Echavarria E, Tomiyama T (2008) A Review of Function Modeling: Approaches and Applications. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 22:147–169.
Erens FJ, Verhulst K (1997) Architectures of Product Families. Computers in Industry 33(2-3):165-178.
French MJ (1971) Engineering design: the conceptual stage. Heinemann Educational Books Ltd, London.
Gero JS, Kannengiesser U (2002) The situated Function Behaviour framework. Design Studies 25-4:373-392.
Hirtz J, Stone RB, McAdams DA, Szykman S, Wood KL (2002) A Functional Basis for Engineering Design: Reconciling and Evolving Previous Efforts. Research in Engineering Design 13:65–82.
Hubka V, Eder WE (1988) Theory of technical systems. Springer Verlag, New York.
Jiao J, Tseng M. (2000) Fundamentals of product family architecture. Integrated Manufacturing Systems 11(7):469-483.
Maier JRA, Fadel GM (2009) Affordance-based design methods for innovative design, redesign and reverse engineering. Research in Engineering Design 20-4:225-239.
McAdams D, Stone R, Wood K, (2000) Functional Interdependence and Product Similarity Based on Customer Needs. Journal of Research in Engineering Design 11:1–19.
Nomaguchi Y, Taguchi T, Fujita K, (2010) A framework of describing and managing engineering analysis modeling knowledge for design validation. In: Horvath I, Mandorli F, Rusak Z (ed) Proceedings of TMCE 2010 Symposium, April 1-16, Ancona, Italy, 1055-1067.
Orloff MA (2003) Inventive thinking through TRIZ. Springer, Germany.
Otto KN, Wood KL (2001) Product Design Techniques in Reverse Engineering and New Product Development. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Pahl G, Beitz W (1984) Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach. The Design Council, London.
Stone RB, Wood K (2000) Development of a Functional Basis for Design. Journal of Mechanical Design 122(4):359–370.
Suh N (1990) Principles of Design. Oxford University Press, New York.
Ullman DG (1992) The mechanical design process. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Ulrich K, Eppinger SD (1995) Product design development. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Welch RV, Dixon JR (1992) Representing function, behavior and structure during conceptual design. In : Taylor DL and Stauffer LA (ed.) Design Theory and Methodology American Society of Mechanical Engineers 42:11-18.
Wood WH (2009) A computational representation of functions in engineering design. In: Meijers A (ed.) Handbook of philosophy of technology and engineering sciences 543-564, Elsevier, North Holland.
Yoshikawa H (1981) General Design Theory and a CAD System, Man-Machine Communication in CADICAM. In: Proceedings of the IFIP WGS.2/5.3 Working Conference 1980 Tokyo, 35-58, North Holland, Amsterdam.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag London
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ostrosi, E., Choulier, D., Kurth, M. (2013). A Meta-Model for Engineering Analysis in Product Design. In: Stjepandić, J., Rock, G., Bil, C. (eds) Concurrent Engineering Approaches for Sustainable Product Development in a Multi-Disciplinary Environment. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4426-7_47
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4426-7_47
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4425-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4426-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)