Skip to main content

Strategic Form Games and Nash Equilibrium

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Systems and Control
  • 432 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter introduces strategic form games, which provide a framework for the analysis of strategic interactions in multi-agent environments. We present the main solution concept in strategic form games, Nash equilibrium, and provide tools for its systematic study. We present fundamental results for existence and uniqueness of Nash equilibria and discuss their efficiency properties. We conclude with current research directions in this area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Acemoglu D, Ozdaglar A (2007) Competition and efficiency in congested markets. Math Oper Res 32(1):1–31

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu D, Bimpikis K, Ozdaglar A (2009) Price and capacity competition. Games Econ Behav 66(1):1–26

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Basar T, Olsder GJ (1995) Dynamic noncooperative game theory. Academic, London/New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bertsekas D, Nedich A, Ozdaglar A (2003) Convex analysis and optimization. Athena Scientific, Belmont

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Candogan O, Ozdaglar A, Parrilo PA (2010) A projection framework for near- potential games. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on decision and control, CDC, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  • Candogan O, Menache I, Ozdaglar A, Parrilo PA (2011) Flows and decompositions of games: harmonic and potential games. Math Oper Res 36(3):474–503

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Candogan O, Ozdaglar A, Parrilo PA (2013, forthcoming) Dynamics in near-potential games. Games Econ Behav 82:66–90

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Daskalakis C, Goldberg PW, Papadimitriou CH (2006) The complexity of computing a Nash equilibrium. In: Proceedings of the 38th ACM symposium on theory of computing, STOC, Seattle

    Google Scholar 

  • Debreu D (1952) A social equilibrium existence theorem. Proc Natl Acad Sci 38:886–893

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fan K (1952) Fixed point and minimax theorems in locally convex topological linear spaces. Proc Natl Acad Sci 38:121–126

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg D, Tirole J (1991) Game theory. MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Glicksberg IL (1952) A further generalization of the Kakutani fixed point theorem with application to Nash equilibrium points. Proc Natl Acad Sci 38:170–174

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Izmalkov S, Lepinski M, Micali S, Shelat A (2007) Transparent computation and correlated equilibrium. Working paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Johari R, Tsitsiklis JN (2004) Efficiency loss in a network resource allocation game. Math Oper Res 29(3):407–435

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lipton RJ, Markakis E, Mehta A (2003) Playing large games using simple strategies. In: Proceedings of the ACM conference in electronic commerce, EC, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Myerson RB (1991) Game theory: analysis of conflict. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Njoroge P, Ozdaglar A, Stier-Moses N, Weintraub G (2013) Investment in two-sided markets and the net neutrality debate. Forthcoming in Review of Network Economics

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrilo PA (2006) Polynomial games and sum of squares optimization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on decision and control, CDC, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigou AC (1920) The economics of welfare. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen JB (1965) Existence and uniqueness of equilibrium points for concave N-person games. Econometrica 33(3):520–534

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Roughgarden T, Tardos E (2000) How bad is selfish routing? In: Proceedings of the IEEE symposium on foundations of computer science, FOCS, Redondo Beach

    Google Scholar 

  • Simsek A, Ozdaglar A, Acemoglu D (2005) Uniqueness of generalized equilibrium for box-constrained problems and applications. In: Proceedings of the Allerton conference on communication, control, and computing, Monticello

    Google Scholar 

  • Simsek A, Ozdaglar A, Acemoglu D (2007) Generalized Poincare-Hopf theorem for compact nonsmooth regions. Math Oper Res 32(1):193–214

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Simsek A, Ozdaglar A, Acemoglu D (2008) Local indices for degenerate variational inequalities. Math Oper Res 33(2):291–301

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Stein N, Ozdaglar A, Parrilo PA (2008) Separable and low-rank continuous games. Int J Game Theory 37(4):475–504

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Stein N, Ozdaglar A, Parrilo PA (2013) Exchangeable equilibria, part I: symmetric bimatrix games. Working paper

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Asuman Ozdaglar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this entry

Cite this entry

Ozdaglar, A. (2013). Strategic Form Games and Nash Equilibrium. In: Baillieul, J., Samad, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Systems and Control. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5102-9_27-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5102-9_27-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5102-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EngineeringReference Module Computer Science and Engineering

Publish with us

Policies and ethics