Abstract
Decisions of emergency response organisations (police, fire fighters, infrastructure providers, etc.) rely on accurate and timely information. Some necessary information is integrated into control centre’s IT (weather, availability of electricity, gauge information, etc.), but almost every decision needs to be based on very specific information of the current crisis situation. Due to the unpredictable nature of a crisis, gathering this kind of information requires much improvisation and articulation work which we aim to support. We present a study on how different emergency response organisations communicate with teams on-site to generate necessary information for the coordinating instances, and we described, implemented and evaluated an interaction concept as well as a prototype to support this communication by a semi-structured request-and-report system based on Android devices. We learned that (1) the accuracy of request and reports can be improved by using an appropriate metadata structure in addition to creating multimedia-based information content, (2) requirements of trusted and fast information need to be respected in support concepts although they may even be contradictory, and (3) the coordination strategy of the emergency response organisation also shapes the way this interaction needs to be designed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bergstrand, F., & Landgren, J. (2011). Visual reporting in time-critical work: Exploring video use in emergency response Chalmers University of Technology. Proceedings of the MobileHCI, Stockholm (pp. 415–424).
Betts, B. J., Mah, R. W., Papasin, R., Del Mundo, R., McIntosh, D. M., & Jorgensen, C. (2005). Improving situational awareness for first responders via mobile computing. Moffett Field, CA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration Ames Research Center, Ed..
Bharosa, N., Lee, J., & Janssen, M. (2009). Challenges and obstacles in sharing and coordinating information during multi-agency disaster response: Propositions from field exercises. Information Systems Frontiers, 12(1), 49–65. doi:10.1007/s10796-009-9174-z.
Büscher, M., & Mogensen, P. H. (2007). Designing for material practices of coordinating emergency teamwork. In B. Van De Walle, P. Burghardt, & C. Nieuwenhuis (Eds.), Proceedings of the ISCRAM, Delft.
Catarci, T., De Leoni, M., Marrella, A., Mecella, M., Bortenschlager, M., & Steinmann, R. (2010). The WORKPAD project experience: Improving the disaster response through process management and geo collaboration. Proceedings of the ISCRAM, Seattle.
Christofzik, D., & Reuter, C. (2013). The aggregation of information qualities in collaborative software. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing (IJEV), 5(3).
Erb, B., Kaufmann, S., Schlecht, T., Schaub, F., & Weber, M. (2011). diretto: A toolkit for distributed reporting and collaboration. In M. Eibl (Ed.), Mensch & Computer 2011 (pp. 151–160). Chemnitz: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag.
Goldstein, B. E. (Ed.). (2011). Collaborative resilience—Moving through crisis to opportunity (p. 376). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gomez, E., & Bartolacci, M. (2011). Crisis management and mobile devices: Extending usage of sensor networks within an integrated system framework. Proceedings of the ISCRAM, Lisbon.
Guerrero, L., Ochoa, S. F., Pino, J., & Collazos, C. (2006). Selecting computing devices to support mobile collaboration. Group Decision and Negotiation, 15(3), 243–271. doi:10.1007/s10726-006-9020-3.
Heath, C., & Luff, P. (1992). Collaboration and control: Crisis management and multimedia technology in London Underground Line Control Rooms. Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1(1), 24–48.
Ho, J., & Tang, R. (2001). Towards an optimal resolution to information overload: An infomediary approach. Proceedings of the GROUP (pp. 91–96). New York: ACM.
Kyng, M., Nielsen, E. T., & Kristensen, M. (2006). Challenges in designing interactive systems for emergency response. Proceedings of the DIS (pp. 301–310). New York: ACM Press.
Ley, B., Pipek, V., Reuter, C., & Wiedenhoefer, T. (2012). Supporting improvisation work in inter-organizational crisis management. Proceedings of the conference on human factors in Computing Systems (CHI). Austin: ACM-Press.
Lundberg, J., & Asplund, M. (2011). Communication problems in crisis response. Proceedings of the ISCRAM, Lisbon, Portugal
Mendonca, D. (2007). Decision support for improvisation in response to extreme events: Learning from the response to the 2001 World Trade Center attack. Decision Support Systems, 43(3), 952–967.
Mulder, I., De Poot, H, Verwij, C., Janssen, R., & Bijlsma, M. (2006). An information overload study: Using design methods for understanding. Proc of the OZCHI (pp. 245–252). New York: ACM Press.
Naumann, F., & Rolker, C. (2000). Assessment methods for information quality criteria. Proceedings of International Conference on Information Quality (pp. 158–162).
Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
Nilsson, E. G., & Stølen, K. (2010). Ad Hoc networks and mobile devices in emergency response—a perfect match? (Invited Paper). Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, 49, 17–33.
Normark, M., & Randall, D. (2005). Local expertise at an emergency call centre. In H. Gellersen, K. Schmidt, M. Beaudouin-Lafon, & W. Mackay (Eds.), Proceedings of the ECSCW (pp. 347–366). Paris: Springer.
O’Reilly, C. A. (1980). Individuals and information overload in organizations: Is more necessarily better? Academy of Management Journal, 23(4), 684–696. doi:10.2307/255556.
Okolloh, O. (2009). Ushahidi, or “testimony”: Web 2.0 tools for crowdsourcing crisis information. Participatory Learning and Action, 59(1), 65–70.
Paton, D. (2003). Stress in disaster response: A risk management approach. Disaster Prevention and Management, 12(3), 203–209.
Paul, S. A., & Reddy, M. C. (2010). Understanding together: Sensemaking in collaborative information seeking. Proceedings of the CSCW (pp. 321–330). New York: ACM Press.
Peng, C. Y., Kao, W. S., Liang, Y. Z., & Chiou, W. K. (2007). The practices of scenario observation approach in defining medical tablet PC applications. Proceedings of the MobileHCI (Vol. 4553, pp. 518–524). Beijing: Springer.
Prasanna, R., Yang, L., & King, M. (2011). Evaluation of a software prototype for supporting fire emergency response. Proceedings of the ISCRAM, Lissabon, Portugal.
Reuter, C., Marx, A., & Pipek, V. (2012). Crisis management 2.0: Towards a systematization of social software use in crisis situations. IJISCRAM, 4(1), 1–16.
Reuter, C., Pipek, V., Wiedenhoefer, T., & Ley, B. (2012). Dealing with terminologies in collaborative systems for crisis management. Proceedings of the ISCRAM, Vancouver, Canada.
Schmidt, K., & Bannon, L. (1992). Taking CSCW seriously: Supporting articulation work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1(1), 7–40. doi:10.1007/BF00752449.
Schöning, J., Rohs, M., Krüger, A., & Stasch, C. (2009). Improving the communication of spatial information in crisis response by combining paper maps and mobile devices. In J. Löffler & M. Klann (Eds.), Mobile response: Second international workshop on mobile information technology for emergency response (pp. 57–65). Berlin: Springer.
Singh, G., & Ableiter, D. (2009). TwiddleNet: Smartphones as personal content servers for first responders. In J. Löffler & M. Klann (Eds.), Mobile response: Second international workshop on mobile information technology for emergency response (Vol. 5424, pp. 130–137). Bonn: Springer.
Stein, E. W. (2011). Supporting real time decision-making. In F. Burstein, P. Brézillon, & A. Zaslavsky (Eds.), Supporting real time decision-making (Vol. 13, pp. 13–33). Boston, MA: Springer.
Tamaru, E., Hasuike, K., & Tozaki, M. (2005). Cellular phone as a collaboration tool that empowers and changes the way of mobile work: Focus on three fields of work. Proceedings of the ECSCW (pp. 247–266). Paris: Springer.
Toffler, A. (1970). Future shock. Administrative science quarterly (Vol. 17, p. 423). Random House. doi:10.2307/2392161.
Vieweg, S., Hughes, A. L., Starbird, K., & Palen, L. (2010). Microblogging during two natural hazards events: What twitter may contribute to situational awareness. Proceedings of the CHI (pp. 1079–1088). New York: ACM Press.
Weick, K. E. (1993). The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(4), 628–652.
Winterboer, A., Martens, M. A., Pavlin, G., Groen, F. C. A., & Evers, V. (2011). DIADEM: A system for collaborative environmental monitoring. Proceedings of the CSCW, New York, NY, USA, pp. 589–590.
Wu, A., Yan, X., & Zhang, X. L. (2011). Geo-tagged mobile photo sharing in collaborative emergency management. Proceedings of the VINCI (pp. 7:1–7:8). Hong Kong: ACM Press.
Acknowledgments
The project ‘InfoStrom’ is funded by the German Federal Ministry for Education and Research (No. 13N10712).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag London
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ludwig, T., Reuter, C., Pipek, V. (2013). What You See is What I Need: Mobile Reporting Practices in Emergencies. In: Bertelsen, O., Ciolfi, L., Grasso, M., Papadopoulos, G. (eds) ECSCW 2013: Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 21-25 September 2013, Paphos, Cyprus. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5346-7_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5346-7_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5345-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5346-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)