Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Computer Supported Cooperative Work ((CSCW))

Abstract

As was suggested in Chap. 1, we need to ‘… accumulate and synthesize knowledge about such social domains from case studies to be able to anticipate the use and behavioral impact of new designs’. In turn, Beringer suggests, we need to go about, ‘extracting key findings and summarizing key insights [so that] they can become a reusable set of foundational insights about target domains’. How we might do this, however, is a somewhat intractable problem. The past 20 years and more has, without question, seen a significant shift in the way in which data relating to design problems is collected and analysed. One of the most significant aspects of this has been the ‘turn to the social’ often associated with the deployment of ethnographic practices for design-related purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander, C. (1979). The timeless way of building. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., Jacobson, M., Fiksdahl-King, I., & Angel, S. (1977). A pattern language. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avizienis, A., Laprie, J. C., & Randell, B. (2001). Fundamental concepts of dependability. Computing Science: University of Newcastle upon Tyne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, J. (1995). Preventive maintenance: Stand alone manufacturing compared with cellular manufacturing. Industrial Management, 37(1), 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendifallah, S. A., & Scacchi, W. (1987). Understanding software maintenance work. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE-13(3), 311–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyer, H., & Holzblatt, K. (1998). Contextual design: Defining customer-centred systems. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers. ISBN 1558604111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobrow, D. G., & Whalen, J. (2002). Community knowledge sharing in practice. Reflections, 4(2), 47–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boehm-Davis, D. A., Fox, J. E., & Philips, B. H. (1996). Techniques for exploring program comprehension, empirical studies of programmers (pp. 3–37). Washington, DC: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borchers, J. (2001). A pattern approach to interaction design. AI & Society, 15, 359–376 (Human Computer Interaction, 21(1), January 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carstensen, P. (1999). Here is the knowledge-where should I put it? Findings from a study of how knowledge spaces are used within a support group. In IEEE 8th International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WET ICE ‘99) Proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, F. L. (2000). Implementing TPM in plant maintenance: Some organisational barriers. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 17(9), 1003–1016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crabtree, A., Rouncefield, M., & Tolmie, P. (2012). Doing design ethnography. London: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, M. E., Scholtz, J., & Widenbeck, S. (2002). The roles beacons play in comprehension for novice and expert programmers. In 14th Workshop of the Psychology of Programming Interest Group, Brunel University (pp. 58–78).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dearden, A. M., & Finlay, J. (2006). Pattern languages in HCI: a critical review. Human Computer Interaction, 21(1), 49–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denef, S. (2012). A pattern language of firefighting frontline practice to inform the design of ubiquitous computing. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 277, 308–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dovey, K. (1990). The pattern language and its enemies. Design Studies, 11, 3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, T. (2000). Lingua Francas for design: Sacred places and pattern languages DIS ’00. In Proceedings of the 3rd conference on designing interactive systems: Processes, practices, methods, and techniques (pp. 357–368). New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, R. (1996). Patterns of software. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., & Vlissides, J. (1993). Design patterns: Abstraction and reuse of object-oriented design (Lecture notes in computer science, Vol. 707, pp. 406–431). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gits, C. W. (1992). Design of maintenance concepts. International Journal of Production Economics, 24, 217–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, P. (2005). Patterns, educational design and networked learning: Patterns, pattern languages and design practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology,21(1), 82–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J. A., Randall, D., & Shapiro, D. (1992). From ethnographic record to system design. In Computer supported cooperative work (Vol. 1, pp. 123–141).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J. A., Randall, D., & Shapiro, D. (1993). Designing with ethnography: Making work visible. Interacting with Computers, 5(2), 239–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J., King, V., Rodden, T., & Anderson, H. (1994). Moving out of the control room: Ethnography in system design. In Proceedings of the ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (pp. 429–438). New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaptelinen, V., & Nardi, B. (2006). Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemerer, C., & Slaughter, S. (1997). Determinants of software maintenance profiles: An empirical investigation. Software Maintenance: Research and Practice, 9, 235–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ko, A. J., Aung, H. H., & Myers, B. A. (2005). Eliciting design requirements for maintenance-oriented IDE’s: A detailed study of corrective and perfective maintenance tasks. Human-Computer Interaction Institute, Paper 179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laporte, T. (1996). High reliability organizations: Unlikely, demanding and at risk. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 4, 60–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laporte, T. R., & Consolini, P. M. (1991). Working in practice but not in theory. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1(1), 19–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laporte, T., & Consolini, P. (1998a). Theoretical and operational challenges of “high-reliability organizations”: Air-traffic control and aircraft carriers. International Journal of Public Administration, 21(6-8), 847–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laporte, T., & Consolini, P. (1998b). Working in practice but not in theory: Theoretical challenges of “high-reliability organizations”. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1(1), 19–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J., & Landay, J. A. (2002). Damask: A tool for early-stage design and prototyping of multi-device user interfaces. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on distributed multimedia systems (2002 international workshop on visual computing), San Francisco, CA, September 26–28, 2002 (pp. 573–580).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquez, A. C. (2007). The maintenance management framework: models and methods for complex systems maintenance. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D., & Sommerville, I. (2004). Patterns of cooperative interaction: Linking ethnomethodology and design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 11(1), March (the patterns archive is available at http://polo.lancs.ac.uk/patterns/)

  • McDonald, N., Corrigan, S., Daly, C., & Cromie, S. (2000). Safety management systems and safety culture in aircraft maintenance organisations. Safety Science, 34, 151–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakagawa, T. (2005). Maintenance theory of reliability. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr, J. (1996). Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orton, J. D., & Weick, K. (1990). Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 15, 203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. (1999). Normal accidents: Living with high-risk technologies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pipek, V., & Wulf, V. (2003). Pruning the answer garden: Knowledge sharing in maintenance engineering. In Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 14–18 September, Helsinki, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, D., Harper, R., & Rouncefield, M. (2007). Fieldwork for design. London: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Randall, D., Hughes, J., & Shapiro, D. (1993). Systems development – the fourth dimension: Perspectives on the social organization of work. In P. Quintas (Ed.), Social dimensions of systems engineering: People, processes, policies and software development (pp. 197–214). Hemel Hempstead: Ellis Horwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raouf, A., & Ben-Daya, M. (1995). Total maintenance management: A systematic approach. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 1(1), 6–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rising, L. (1998). The patterns handbook: Techniques, strategies, and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salingaros, N. (2000). The structure of pattern languages. Architectural Research Quarterly, 4, 149–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, K. (2012). The trouble with ‘tacit knowledge’. International Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 21(2--3), 163–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R., & Hawkins, B. (2004). Lean maintenance. Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R., & Mobley, R. K. (2008). Rules of thumb for maintenance and reliability engineers. Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1997). Grounded theory in practice. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, L. (2001). Linking maintenance strategies to performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 70, 237–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, E. B. (1976). The dimensions of maintenance. In ICSE ‘76 Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on software engineering (pp. 492–497). New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, W.-G., & Gable, G. (1998). Attitudes of maintenance personnel towards maintenance work: A comparative analysis. Journal of Software Maintenance: Research and Practice,10(1), 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Welie, M., & van der Veer, G. (2003). Pattern languages in interaction design: Structure and Organization Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT’03M (Rauterberg, M., Menozzi, M., & Wesson, J., Eds., pp. 527–534). Amsterdam: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wireman, T. (2004). Benchmarking best practices in maintenance management. New York: Industrial Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamauchi, Y., Whalen, J., & Bobrow, D. (2003). Information use of service technicians in difficult cases. In 2003 Proceeding CHI ’03: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Randall .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kashimura, K., Hara, Y., Ikeya, N., Randall, D. (2015). Patterns of Work: A Pragmatic Approach. In: Wulf, V., Schmidt, K., Randall, D. (eds) Designing Socially Embedded Technologies in the Real-World. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6720-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6720-4_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-6719-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-6720-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics