Skip to main content

On the Analysis of Prosody in Interaction

  • Chapter
Computing Prosody

Abstract

The research reported here is conducted within the ongoing research project “Prosodic Segmentation and Structuring of Dialogue”. The object of study in the project is the prosody of dialogue in a language technology framework. The specific goal of our research is to increase our understanding of how the prosodic aspects of speech are exploited interactively in dialogue—the genuine environment for prosody—and on the basis of this increased knowledge to be able to create a more powerful prosody model. In this paper we give an overview of project design and methods and present some tentative findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. G. Ayers. Discourse functions of pitch range in spontaneous and read speech. OSU Working Papers in Linguistics, 44:1–49, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Blomberg, R. Carlson, K. Elenius, B. Granström, S. Hunnicutt, R. Lindell, and L. Neovius. An experimental dialogue system: Waxholm. RUUL 23, Fonetik -93, pp. 49–52, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Brown, K. L. Currie, and J. Kenworthy. Questions of Intonation. London: Croom Helm, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. Bruce and B. Granström. Modelling Swedish intonation in a text-to-speech system. Proceedings Fonetik-89, STL- QPSR 1:17–21, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. Bruce and B. Granström. Prosodie modelling in Swedish speech synthesis. Speech Communication 13, 63–73, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. G. Bruce, B. Granström, M. Filipsson, K. Gustafson, M. Horne, D. House, B. Lastow, and P. Touati. Speech synthesis in spoken dialogue research. Proceedings of the European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, Madrid, Spain, 2:1169–1172, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Bruce, B. Granström, K. Gustafson, D. House, and P. Touati. Modelling Swedish prosody in a dialogue framework. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Yokohama, Japan, pp. 1099–1102, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. Bruce, B. Granström, K. Gustafson, D. House, and P. Touati. Preliminary report from the project “Prosodie segmentation and structuring of dialogue”. Working Papers 43, Fonetik -94 pp. 34–37, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. Bruce, B. Granström, K. Gustafson, M. Horne, D. House, and P. Touati. Towards an enhanced prosodie model adapted to dialogue applications. Proceedings ESCA Workshop on Dialogue Management, Aalborg, Denmark, pp. 201–204, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. Bruce, B. Granström, K. Gustafson, and D. House. Interaction of F0 and duration in the perception of prosodic phrasing in Swedish. In B. Granström and L. Nord, editors, Nordic Prosody VI, pp. 7–22. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. Bruce, B. Granström, K. Gustafson, and D. House. Prosodic modelling of phrasing in Swedish. Working papers 41, Proceedings of the ESC A Workshop on Prosody, Lund University, Sweden, pp. 180–183, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. Bruce, B. Granström, and D. House. Prosodic phrasing in Swedish speech synthesis. In G. Bailly, C. Benoît, and T. R. Sawallis, editors, Talking Machines: Theories, Models, and Designs, pp. 113–125. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. Bruce. Swedish Word Accents in Sentence Perspective. Lund: Gleerup, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  14. G. Bruce. How floating is focal accent? In Gregersen and BasbØll, editors, Nordic Prosody IV, pp. 41–49. Odense: Odense University Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. Bruce. Modelling Swedish intonation for read and spontaneous speech. In Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden, Vol. 2, pp. 28–35, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  16. G. Bruce and P. Touati. On the analysis of prosody in spontaneous dialogue. In Working Papers 36, pp. 37–55. Department of Linguistics, Lund University, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  17. G. Bruce and P. Touati. On the analysis of prosody in spontaneous speech with exemplifications from Swedish and French. Speech Communication, 11:453–458, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. R. Carlson, B. Granström, and S. Hunnicutt. Multilingual text-to-speech development and applications. In W. Ainsworth, editor, Advances in Speech, Hearing and Language Processing, pp. 269–296. London: JAI Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. Carlson, B. Granström, and I. Karlsson. Experiments with voice modelling in speech synthesis. Speech Communication, 10:481–490, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. R. Carlson and S. Hunnicutt. Dialog management in the Waxholm system. Working Papers 43, Fonetik -94, pp. 46–49, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. Cutler and M. Pearson. On the analysis of prosodic turn-taking cues. In C. Johns-Lewis, editor, Intonation in Discourse, pp. 139–155. London: Croom Helm, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  22. E. Gårding. Prosodiska drag i spontant och uppläst tal. in G. Holm, editor, Svenskt talspråk. pp. 40–85, Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell, pp. 40–85, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  23. B. Granström and L. Nord. Neglected dimensions in speech synthesis. Speech Communication, 11:459–462, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. D. House and G. Bruce. Word and focal accents in Swedish from a recognition perspective. In Wiik and Raimo, editors, Nordic Prosody V, pp. 156–173. Turku: Turku University, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  25. M. Home, M. Filipsson, C. Johansson, M. Ljungqvist, and A. Lindstrom. Improving the prosody in TTS systems: Morphological and lexical-semantic methods for tracking ‘new’ vs. ‘given’ information. Working Papers 4U Proceedings of the ESC A Workshop on Prosody, Lund University, Sweden, pp. 208–211, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  26. J. Hirschberg. Studies of intonation and discourses Working Papers 41, Proceedings of the ESC A Workshop on Prosody, Lund University, Sweden, pp. 90–95, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  27. M. Horne. Generating prosodic structure for synthesis of Swedish intonation. Working Papers 43, Fonetik 94, pp. 72–75, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  28. D. House. Tonal Perception in Speech. Lund: Lund University Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  29. I.P.A. Report on the 1989 Kiel convention. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 19 (2):67–80, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. P. Linell and L. Gustavsson. Initiativ och respons. Om dialogens dynamik, dominans och koherens. Studies in Communication, 15, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  31. E. Moulines and F. Charpentier. Pitch-synchronous waveform processing techniques for text-to-speech synthesis using diphone. Speech Communication, 9:453–467, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. G. Möhler and G. Dogil. Test environment for the two level model of Germanic prominence. Proceedings of the European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, Madrid, Spain, 2:1019–1022, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  33. J. Markel and A. Gray, Jr. Linear Prediction of Speech. Berlin: Springer, 1976.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. K. Silverman, M. Beckman, J. Pitrelli, M. Ostendorf, C. Wightman, P. Price, J. Pierrehumbert, and J. Hirschberg. ToBI: a standard for labelling English prosody. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Banff, Canada, Vol. 2, pp. 867–870, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  35. E. Strangert, E. Ejerhed, and D. Huber. Clause structure and prosodic segmentation. RUUL 23, Fonetik -93, pp. 81–84, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  36. E. Strangert and M. Heldner. Prosodic labelling and acoustic data. Working Papers 43, Fonetik -94 Department of Linguistics, Lund University, pp. 120–123, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  37. E. Strangert and M. Heldner. Labelling of boundaries and prominences by phonetically experienced and non- experienced transcribers. PHONUM, 3:85–109, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  38. P. Touati. Overall pitch and direct quote-comment structure in French political rhetoric. RUUL 23, Fonetik -93, pp. 98–101, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  39. P. Touati. Pitch range and register in French political speech. In Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden, Vol. 4, pp. 244–247, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bruce, G., Granström, B., Gustafson, K., Horne, M., House, D., Touati, P. (1997). On the Analysis of Prosody in Interaction. In: Sagisaka, Y., Campbell, N., Higuchi, N. (eds) Computing Prosody. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2258-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2258-3_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7476-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-2258-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics