Skip to main content

Collaborative Virtual Environments for Reflective Community Building at Work: The Case of TARGET

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning at the Workplace

Abstract

In this article, we present initial results of designing a community, outlined in the TARGET framework. The main aim of the TARGET project is to research, analyze, and develop a new genre of technology-enhanced learning environment—a reflective learning community integrated at the workplace that supports rapid access to competence development of individuals, namely, knowledge workers within the domains of project management and sustainable manufacturing. The open question was: To what extent can 3D collaborative virtual environments (CVEs) facilitate reflective dialogue in communities to support lifelong workplace learning? One possible answer is given in this case. The empirical study is held as a part of the TARGET International Summer School, which acted as a forum for the presentation of innovative approaches, developments, and outcomes of research projects. The results of the study were analyzed to complement the TARGET community, seeding methodology as well as to provide implications for the use of 3D CVEs for community building. In addition, TARGET illustrates how learning and working might be well integrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The authors would like to recommend Dr. Michael Thomas Flanagan’s Webpage for an update on the activities and research connected to threshold concepts: http://www.ee.ucl.ac.uk/~mflanaga/thresholds.html.

References

  • Arias, E. G., & Fischer, G. (2000). Boundary objects: Their role in articulating the task at hand and making information relevant to it. Paper Presented at the International Symposium on Interactive & Collaborative Computing (ICC) (pp. 567–574). ICSC Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkins, C. (2009). Virtual experience: Observations on second life. In M. Purvis & B. Savarimuthu (Eds.), Computer-mediated social networking (pp. 7–17). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M. W. (2008). Toward a definition of “virtual worlds”. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 1(1), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos-Ciussi, M., Augier, M., & Rosner, G. (2008). Learning communities are not mushrooms—or—how to cultivate learning communities in higher education. In C. Kimble, P. Hildreth, & I. Bourdon (Eds.), Communities of practice: creating learning environments for educators (pp. 287–308). Charlotte, NC: Information.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronack, S., Sanders, R., Cheney, A., Riedl, R., Tashner, J., & Matzen, N. (2008). Presence p­edagogy: Teaching and learning in a 3D virtual immersive world. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(1), 59–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practice: Towards a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., Duguid, P., & Haviland, S. (1994). Toward informed participation: Six scenarios in search of democracy in the information age. The Aspen Institute Quarterly, 6(4), 49–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chou, C. (2009). Virtual worlds for organization learning and communities of practice. In U. Cress, V. Dimitrova, & M. Specht (Eds.), Learning in the synergy of multiple disciplines (pp. 751–756). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • de Freitas, S. (2008). Serious virtual worlds report. Bristol: Joint Information Systems Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (2007). From communities of practice to mycorrhizae. In J. Hughes, N. Jewson, & L. Unwin (Eds.), Communities of practice: Critical perspectives (pp. 41–54). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G. (2000). Social creativity, symmetry of ignorance and meta-design. Knowledge-Based Systems Journal (Special Issue on Creativity & Cognition), 13(7–8), 527–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G. (2001). External and shareable artifacts as opportunities for social creativity in communities of interest. Paper Presented at the Fifth International Conference on Computational and Cognitive Models of Creative Design (pp. 67–89). University of Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G. (2005). Distances and diversity: Sources for social creativity. Paper Presented at the Fifth Conference on Creativity & Cognition (pp 128–136). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G., & Ostwald, J. (2002). Seeding, evolutionary growth, and reseeding: Enriching ­participatory design with informed participation. Paper Presented at the Seventh Biennial Participatory Design Conference (PDC), CPSR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G., Rohde, M., & Wulf, V. (2007). Community-based learning: The core competency of residential, research based universities. International Journal for Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(1), 9–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fominykh, M., & Prasolova-Førland, E. (2011). Virtual research arena: Presenting research in 3D virtual environments. Paper Presented at the Second Global Conference on Learning and Technology (Global Learn Asia Pacific), AACE (pp. 1558–1567).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, A. (2007). Critiquing theories of learning and communities of practice. In J. Hughes, N. Jewson, & L. Unwin (Eds.), Communities of practice: Critical perspectives (pp. 17–30). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmer, J. (2007). Second life and virtual worlds. Sheffield: Learning Light.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huges, J., Jewson, N., & Unwin, L. (2007). Conclusion: Further development and unresolved issues. In J. Hughes, N. Jewson, & L. Unwin (Eds.), Communities of practice: Critical perspectives (pp. 171–178). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. (2010). Where good ideas come from: The natural history of innovation. New York: Riverhead Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlsen, J. T. (2011). Supportive culture for efficient project uncertainty management. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 4(2), 240–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaulback, B., & Bergtholdt, D. (2008). Holding the virtual space: The roles and responsibilities of community stewardship. In C. Kimble, P. Hildreth, & I. Bourdon (Eds.), Communities of ­practice: Creating learning environments for educators (pp. 25–44). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. T. (1996). Crossing boundaries: Knowledge, disciplinarities, and interdisciplinarities (knowledge, disciplinarity & beyond). Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. H. F., Land, R., & Baillie, C. (Eds.). (2009). Threshold concepts and transformational learning (Vol. 42). Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. H. F., Land, R., & Smith, J. (Eds.). (2008). Threshold concepts within the disciplines (Vol. 16). Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1986). Constructionism: A new opportunity for elementary science education: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Media Laboratory, Epistemology and Learning Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991a). Situating constructionism. In S. Papert & I. Harel (Eds.), Constructionism (pp. 193–206). Westport, CT: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S., & Harel, I. (Eds.). (1991b). Constructionism: Research reports and essays 1985–1990 by the Epistemology and Learning Research Group. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, S., Hwang, H. S., & Choi, M. (2009). The experience of presence in 3D Web environment: An Analysis of Korean second life. Paper Presented at the 13th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Part IV: Interacting in Various Application Domains (pp. 387–395). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasolova-Førland, E., & Hokstad, L. M. (2009). Supporting learning communities through a lifecycle in a serious games context: Requirements for social tools. Paper Presented at the 12th International Conference on Computers and Advanced Technology in Education (CATE), ACTA. https://www.actapress.com/contactus.aspx

  • Rittel, H. (1984). Second-generation design methods. In N. Cross (Ed.), Developments in design methodology (pp. 317–327). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L. (1989). The structure of ill-structured solutions: Boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. In L. Gasser & M. N. Huhns (Eds.), Distributed artificial intelligence (pp. 37–54). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M. (2005). Structural and epistemic parameters in communities of practice. Organization Science, 16(2), 151–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Nederveen, S. (2007). Collaborative design in second life. Paper Presented at the Second International Conference World of Construction Project Management (WCPM) (pp. 1–6), TU-Delft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E., White, N., & Smith, J. D. (2009). Digital habitats: Stewarding technology for ­communities. Portland, OR: CPsquare.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements 

The research presented in this chapter is funded by EU FP7 TARGET project, grant agreement nr. 231717.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leif M. Hokstad .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hokstad, L.M., Prasolova-Førland, E., Fominykh, M. (2013). Collaborative Virtual Environments for Reflective Community Building at Work: The Case of TARGET. In: Goggins, S., Jahnke, I., Wulf, V. (eds) Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning at the Workplace. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series, vol 14. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1740-8_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics