Glossary
- Node (in Scholarly Networks):
-
Entities such as words, papers, patent, authors, journals, institutions, fields, or country
- Edge (in Scholarly Networks):
-
Citation, cocitation, co-word, coauthor, bibliographic coupling, or hybrid relations
- Scholarly Network:
-
The combination of edge properties and node properties defines a scholarly network
- Macro-level Approach:
-
Statistics that are used to identify the global structural features of the networks, including component, bicompo-nent, shortest distance, clustering coefficient, degree distribution, and error and attack tolerance
- Meso-level Approach:
-
Approaches that focus on the behavior of a group of actors, including topic identification and community detection
- Microlevel Approach:
-
Indicators that are useful to understand individual node's power, stratification, ranking,...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bergstrom CT, West JD (2008) Assessing citations with the Eigenfactor™ metrics. Neurology 71(23):1850–1851
Blei DM, Ng AY, Jordan MI (2003) Latent Dirichlet allocation. J Mach Learn Res 3(4–5):993–1033
Bollen J, Rodriguez MA, Van de Sompel H (2006) Journal status. Scientometrics 69(3):669–687
Boyack KW, Klavans AR, Börner K (2005) Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics 64(3):351–374
Brin S, Page L (1998) The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Comput Netw ISDN Syst 30(1–7): 107–117
Freeman LC (1979) Centrality in social networks: conceptual clarification. Soc Netw 1(3):215–239
Hirsch JE (2005) An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(46): 16569–16572
Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M, Henderson AD (1993) Geographical localization of knowledge spillovers by patent citations. Q J Econ 108(3):577–599
Kessler MM (1963) Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. Am Doc 14(1): 10–25
Leydesdorff L, Persson O (2010) Mapping the geography of science: distribution patterns and networks of relations among cities and institutes. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 61(8):1622–1634
Newman MEJ (2003) The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev 45(2): 167–256
Newman M, Girvan M (2004) Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Phys Rev E 69(2):026113
Nooy W, Mrvar A, Batagelj V (2005) Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Pinski G, Narin F (1976) Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: theory, with application to the literature of physics. Inf Process Manag 12(5):297–312
Porter AL, Roessner JD, Cohen AS, Perreault M (2006) Interdisciplinary research: meaning, metrics and nurture. Res Eval 15(3):187–195
Radicchi F, Fortunato S, Markines B, Vespignani A (2009) Diffusion of scientific credits and the ranking of scientists. Phys Rev E 80(5):056103
Rafols I, Meyer M (2010) Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience. Scientometrics 82(2): 263–287
Rinia EJ, Van Leeuwen TN, Bruins EEW, Van Vuren HG, Van Raan AFJ (2002) Measuring knowledge transfer between fields of science. Scientometrics 54(3): 347–362
Rosvall M, Bergstrom CT (2008) Maps of information flow reveal community structure in complex networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(4):1118–1123
SCImago (2007) SJR: SCImago Journal & Country Rank. http://www.scimagojr.com. Retrieved 31 Aug 2009
Seidman SB (1983) Network structure and minimum degree. Soc Netw 5:269–287
Walker D, Xie H, Yan KK, Maslov S (2007) Ranking scientific publications using a simple model of network traffic. J Stat Mech: Theory Exp P06010. doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2007/06/P06010
Waltman L, Van Eck NJ, Noyons ECM (2010) A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. J Informetr 4(4):629–635
White HD, McCain KW (1998) Visualizing a discipline: an author co-citation analysis of information science 1972–1995. J Am Soc Inf Sci 49(4):327–355
Yan E, Ding Y (2012) Scholarly network similarities: how bibliographic coupling networks, citation networks, co-citation networks, topical networks, coauthorship networks, and co-word networks relate to each other. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 63(7):1313–1326
Yan E, Ding Y, Sugimoto CR (2011) P-Rank: an indicator measuring prestige in heterogeneous scholarly networks. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 62(3): 467–477
Yan E, Ding Y, Cronin B, Leydesdorff L (2013) A bird'seye view of scientific trading: dependency relations among fields of science. J Informetr 7(2):249–264
Yin L, Kretschmer H, Hanneman RA, Liu Z (2006) Connection and stratification in research collaboration: an analysis of the COLLNET network. Inf Process Manag 42(6):1599–1613
Zhang L, Liu X, Janssens F, Liang L, Glänzel W (2010) Subject clustering analysis based on ISI category classification. J Informetr 4(2):185–193
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this entry
Cite this entry
Yan, E., Ding, Y. (2014). Scholarly Networks Analysis. In: Alhajj, R., Rokne, J. (eds) Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6170-8_249
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6170-8_249
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6169-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6170-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceReference Module Computer Science and Engineering