Skip to main content

Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Systems and Perceptual Computers: Their Similarities and Differences

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Type-2 Fuzzy Sets and Systems

Part of the book series: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing ((STUDFUZZ,volume 301))

Abstract

In this chapter, we compare the interval type-2 fuzzy logic system and perceptual computer, so as to eliminate confusion among researchers about whether or not there really are differences between them. We show that there are many more differences than similarities between them by focusing on the following six issues: inputs and membership functions, fuzzifier versus encoder, rules versus computing with words (CWW) engines, inference versus output of CWW engine, output processing versus decoder, and outputs versus recommendation plus data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A type-2 fuzzy set can be thought of as a type-1 fuzzy set on steroids. Its membership function no longer has a single value at each value of the primary variable, but instead is a blurred version of that function, i.e., at each value of the primary variable the membership is itself a function, called a secondary membership function (MF). When the secondary MF is a constant equal to 1, the type-2 fuzzy set is called an interval type-2 fuzzy set or an interval-valued fuzzy set; otherwise, it is called a general type-2 fuzzy set. The MF of a T2 FS is three-dimensional, with x-axis called the primary variable, y-axis called the secondary variable (or primary membership), and z-axis called the MF value (or secondary MF value). A vertical slice is a plane that is parallel to the MF-value z-axis. The footprint of uncertainty (FOU) of a T2 FS lies on the x–y plane (i.e., the primary and secondary variable plane) and includes all points on that plane for which the MF value is nonzero; it is the 2D-domain on which sit the secondary membership values. The FOU can be completely covered by T1 FSs that are called embedded T1 FSs.

  2. 2.

    TSK rules are also available in which their consequents are dynamical systems, but such rules are outside of the scope of this chapter.

  3. 3.

    The MF for a function of T1 FSs equals the union (over all values of alpha) of the MFs for the same function applied to the alpha cuts of the T1 FSs.

References

  1. Castillo, O., Melin, P.: Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Theory and Applications. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Karnik, N.N., Mendel, J.M., Liang, Q.: Type-2 fuzzy logic systems. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 7, 643–658 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Liang, Q., Mendel, J.M.: Interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems: theory and design. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 8, 535–550 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mendel, J.M.: Uncertain Rule-Based Fuzzy Logic Systems: Introduction and New Directions. Prentice-Hall, Upper-Saddle River (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mendel, J.M.: Type-2 fuzzy sets and systems: an overview. IEEE Comput. Intell. Mag. 2, 20–29 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jang, J.S.R., Sun, C.T.: Neuro-fuzzy modeling and control. IEEE Proc 83, 378–406 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jang, J.S.R., Sun, C.T., Mizutani, E.: Neuro-fuzzy and Soft-Computing. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mendel, J.M.: Fuzzy logic systems for engineering: a tutorial. Proc. IEEE 83, 345–377 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mendel, J.M: The perceptual computer: an architecture for computing with words. In: Proceedings of Modeling with Words, Workshop in Proceedings of FUZZ-IEEE 35–38, Melbourne, Australia (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mendel, J.M.: An architecture for making judgments using computing with words. Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci. 12, 325–335 (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Mendel, J.M.: Computing with words and its relationships with fuzzistics. Info. Sci. 177, 998–1006 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mendel, J.M.: Computing with words: Zadeh, Turing, Popper and Occam. IEEE Comput. Intell. Mag. 2, 10–17 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mendel, J.M., Wu, D.: Perceptual Computing: Aiding People in Making Subjective Judgments. IEEE Press and John Wiley, Hoboken (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy logic = computing with words. IEEE Trans on Fuzzy Syst. 4, 103–111 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zadeh, L.A: From computing with numbers to computing with words—from manipulation of measurements to manipulation of perceptions. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst.–I: Fundam. Theory Appls 4, pp. 105–119. (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hagras, H.: Hierarchical type-2 fuzzy logic control architecture for autonomous mobile robots. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 12, 524–539 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hagras, H.: Type-2 FLCs: a new generation of fuzzy controllers. IEEE Comput. Intell. Mag. 2, 30–43 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kreinovich, V., Mouzouris, G.C., Nguyen, H.T: Fuzzy rule-based modeling as a universal approximation tool. In: Nguyen, H.T., Sugeno, M. (eds.) Fuzzy Systems Modeling and Control, pp. 134–195, Kluwer, Boston (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kennedy, J., Eberhart, R: Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, pp. 1942–1948. (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Xi, M., Sun, J., Xu, W.: An improved quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization algorithm with weighted mean best position. Appl. Math. Comput. 205, 751–759 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang, S., Wang, M., Jiao, L: A quantum particle swarm optimization. In: Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC2004) vol. 1, pp. 320–324. (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mendel, J.M.: Computing derivatives in interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 12, 84–98 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mendel, J.M.: Computing with words, when words can mean different things to different People. In: Proceedings of Third International ICSC Symposium on Fuzzy Logic and Applications, Rochester University, Rochester (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mendel, J.M.: Fuzzy sets for words: a new beginning. In: Proceedings of FUZZ-IEEE, pp. 37–42, St. Louis MO (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Liu, F., Mendel, J.M.: Encoding words into interval type-2 fuzzy sets using an interval approach. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 16, 1503–1521 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wu, D., Mendel, J.M., Coupland, S.: Enhanced interval approach for encoding words into interval type-2 fuzzy sets and its convergence analysis. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 20, 499–513 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mamdani, E.H.: Applications of fuzzy algorithms for simple dynamic plant. Proc. IEEE 121, 1585–1588 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sugeno, M., Kang, G.T.: Structure identification of fuzzy model. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 28, 15–33 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Takagi, T., Sugeno, M.: Fuzzy identification of systems and its application to modeling and control. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 15, 116–132 (1985)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu, F., Mendel, J.M.: Aggregation using the fuzzy weighted average, as computed by the KM algorithms. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 16, 1–12 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wu, D., Mendel, J.M.: Aggregation using the linguistic weighted average and interval type-2 fuzzy sets. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 15, 1145–1161 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wu, D., Mendel, J.M.: Corrections to Aggregation using the linguistic weighted average and interval type-2 fuzzy sets. IEEE Trans on Fuzzy Systems 16, 1664–1666 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rickard, J.T., Aisbett, J., Yager, R.R., Gibbon, G: Fuzzy weighted power means in evaluating decisions. In: Proceedings of World Conference on Soft Computing, San Francisco (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rickard, J.T., Aisbett, J., Yager, R.R., Gibbon, G.: Linguistic weighted power means: comparison with the linguistic weighted average. In: Proceedings of FUZZ-IEEE, pp. 2185–2192. Taipei, Taiwan (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mendel, J.M., Wu, D.: Perceptual reasoning for perceptual computing. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 16, 1550–1564 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wu, D., Mendel, J.M.: Perceptual reasoning for perceptual computing: a similarity-based approach. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 17, 1397–1411 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wu, D., Mendel, J.M.: A comparative study of ranking methods, similarity measures and uncertainty measures for interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Inf. Sci. 179, 1169–1192 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Karnik, N.N., Mendel, J.M.: Centroid of a type-2 fuzzy set. Inf. Sci. 132, 195–220 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Klir, G., Yuan, B.: Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic: Theory and Applications. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River 1995

    Google Scholar 

  40. Mendel, J.M., John, R.I.: Type-2 fuzzy sets made simple. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 10, 117–127 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Mendel, J.M., John, R.I., Liu, F.: Interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems made simple. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 14, 808–821 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Liu, X., Mendel, J.M.: Connect Karnik-Mendel algorithms to root-finding for computing the centroid of an interval type-2 fuzzy set. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 19, 652–665 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Vlachos, I., Sergiadis, G.: Subsethood, entropy, and cardinality for interval-valued fuzzy sets—an algebraic derivation. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 158, 1384–1396 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Kosko, B.: Neural Network and Fuzzy Systems, a Dynamical Systems Approach to Machine Intelligence. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Wu, D., Mendel, J.M.: Enhanced Karnik-Mendel algorithms. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 17, 923–934 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jerry M. Mendel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mendel, J.M. (2013). Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Systems and Perceptual Computers: Their Similarities and Differences. In: Sadeghian, A., Mendel, J., Tahayori, H. (eds) Advances in Type-2 Fuzzy Sets and Systems. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 301. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6666-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6666-6_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6665-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6666-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics