Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Decision-Making Tasks

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover Encyclopedia of Computational Neuroscience

  • 401 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Battaglia PW, Jacobs RA, Aslin RN (2003) Bayesian integration of visual and auditory signals for spatial localization. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 20(7):1391–1397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Behrens TEJ, Woolrich MW, Walton ME, Rushworth MFS (2007) Learning the value of information in an uncertain world. Nature Neurosci 10(9):1214–1221

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bogacz R, Brown E, Moehlis J, Hu P, Holmes P, Cohen JD (2006) The physics of optimal decision making: a formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced choice tasks. Psychol Rev 113(4):700–765

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Busemeyer JR, Townsend JT (1993) Decision field theory. Psychol Rev 100:432–459

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cho RY, Nystrom LE, Brown ET, Jone AD, Braver TS, Holmes PJ, Cohen JD (2002) Mechanisms underlying dependencies of performance on stimulus history in a two-alternative forced choice task. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2:283–299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Churchland AK, Kiani R, Shadlen MN (2008) Decision-making with multiple alternatives. Nat Neurosci 11(6):693–702

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dayan P, Kakade S, Montague PR (2000) Learning and selective attention. Nat Rev Neurosci 3:1218–1223

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Devauges V, Sara SJ (1990) Activation of the noradrenergic system facilitates an attentional shift in the rat. Behav Brain Res 39(1):19–28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Donders FC (1969) On the speed of mental processes. Acta Psychol (Amst) 30:412

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Driver J, Noesselt T (2008) Multisensory interplay reveals crossmodal influences on “sensory-specific” brain regions, neural responses, and judgments. Neuron Rev 57:11–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen BA, Eriksen CW (1974) Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Percept Psychophys 16:143–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst MO, Banks MS (2002) Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415(6870):429–433

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gold JI, Shadlen MN (2002) Banburismus and the brain: decoding the relationship between sensory stimuli, decisions, and reward. Neuron 36:299–308

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez P, Ratcliff R, Perea M (2007) A model of the go-nogo task. J Exp Psychol 136(3):389–413. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.136.3.389.A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath T, Chatterjee S (1995) Asymmetric decoy effects on lower-quality versus higher-quality brands: meta-analytic and experimental evidence. J Consum Res 22:268–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein RJ (1961) Relative and absolute strength of responses as a function of frequency of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav 4:267–272

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein RJ (1970) On the law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav 13:243–266

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huber J, Payne J (1982) Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: violations of regularity and the similarity hypothesis. J Consum Res 9(1):90–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs RA (1999) Optimal integration of texture and motion cues in depth. Vis Res 39:3621–3629

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica 47:313–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A (eds) (1982) Judgement under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Kording KP, Beierholm U, Ma W, Quartz S, Tenenbaum J, Shams L (2007) Causal inference in cue combination. PLoS One 2(9):e943

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laming DRJ (1968) Information theory of choice-reaction times. Academic, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Leotti LA, Wager TD (2009) Motivational influences on response inhibition measures. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 36(2):430–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan G, Cowan W (1984) On the ability to inhibit thought and action: a theory of an act of control. Psych Rev 91:295–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nassar MR, Wilson RC, Heasly B, Gold JI (2010) An approximately Bayesian delta-rule model explains the dynamics of belief updating in a changing environment. J Neurosci 30(37):12366–12378

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nassar MR, Rumsey KM, Wilson RC, Parikh K, Heasly B, Gold JI (2012) Rational regulation of learning dynamics by pupil-linked arousal systems. Nature Neurosci 15(7):1040–1046

    Google Scholar 

  • Newsome WT, Paré EB (1988) A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT). J Neurosci 8(6):2201–2211

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliff R, Rouder JN (1998) Modeling response times for two-choice decisions. Psychol Sci 9:347–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliff R, Smith PL (2004) A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time. Psychol Rev 111:333–346

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roitman JD, Shadlen MN (2002) Response of neurons in the lateral intraparietal area during a combined visual discrimination reaction time task. J Neurosci 22(21):9475–9489

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salinas E, Stanford TR (2013) Waiting is the hardest part: comparison of two computational strategies for performing a compelled-response task. Front Comput Neurosci 33(13):5668–5685

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salinas E, Shankar S, Gabriela Costello M, Zhu D, Stanford TR (2010) Waiting is the hardest part: comparison of two computational strategies for performing a compelled-response task. Front Comput Neurosci. doi:10.3389/fn-com.2010.00153

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shadlen MN, Newsome WT (2001) Neural basis of a perceptual decision in the parietal cortex (area LIP) of the rhesus monkey. J Neurophysiol 86:1916–1935

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shams L, Kamitani Y, Shimojo S (2000) What you see is what you hear. Nature 408:788

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shams L, Ma WJ, Beierholm U (2005) Sound-induced flash illusion as an optimal percept. Neuroreport 16(17):1923–1927

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shenoy P, Yu AJ (2011) Rational decision-making in inhibitory control. Front Hum Neurosci. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00048

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shenoy P, Yu AJ (2012) Strategic impatience in Go/NoGo versus forced-choice decision-making. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 25

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenoy P, Yu AJ (2013) A rational account of contextual effects in preference choice: what makes for a bargain? In: Proceedings of the thirty-fifth annual conference of the cognitive science society. Berlin, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon JR (1967) Ear preference in a simple reaction-time task. J Exp Psychol 75(1):49–55

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simonson I (1989) Choice based on reasons: the case of attraction and compromise effects. J Consum Res 16:158–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stroop JR (1935) Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol Gen 18:643–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trueblood JS (2012) Multialternative context effects obtained using an inference task. Psychon Bull Rev 19(5):962–968. doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0288-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky A (n.d.) Elimination by aspects: a theory of choice. Psychol Rev 79:288–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Usher M, McClelland JL (2001) The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model. Psychol Rev 108(3):550–592

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Usher M, McClelland J (2004) Loss aversion and inhibition in dynamical models of multialternative choice. Psychol Rev 111(3):757–769

    Google Scholar 

  • Wald A (1947) Sequential analysis. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wald A, Wolfowitz J (1948) Optimal character of the sequential probability ratio test. Ann Math Statist 19:326–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu AJ, Cohen JD (2009) Sequential effects: superstition or rational behavior? Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 21:1873–1880

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu AJ, Dayan P (2005) Uncertainty, neuromodulation, and attention. Neuron 46:681–692

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yu AJ, Huang H (2014) Maximizing masquerading as matching in human visual search choice behavior. Decision (To appear)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu AJ, Dayan P, Cohen JD (2009) Dynamics of attentional selection under conflict: toward a rational Bayesian account. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 35:700–717

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, 0515, La Jolla, CA, 92103, USA

    Prof. Angela J. Yu

Authors
  1. Prof. Angela J. Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angela J. Yu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Atlanta, Georgia, USA

    Dieter Jaeger

  2. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA

    Ranu Jung

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Yu, A.J. (2014). Decision-Making Tasks. In: Jaeger, D., Jung, R. (eds) Encyclopedia of Computational Neuroscience. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7320-6_314-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7320-6_314-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7320-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation