Skip to main content

The Roadmap of Trust and Trust Evaluation in Web Applications and Web Services

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

In the 1980s and 1990s, the issue of trust in many aspects of life has drawn much attention in a significant number of studies in social science. Nowadays, with the development of Web applications, trust evaluation has become a significant and important issue, especially when a client has to select a trustworthy one from a pool of unknown service providers. An effective and efficient trust evaluation system is highly desirable and critical to clients for identifying potential risks, providing objective trust results and preventing huge monetary losses.This research roadmap presents an overview of the general structure of trust, the bases of trust and the concepts of trust in different disciplines. Then the typical trust evaluation methods in each area of Web applications, including e-commerce, P2P networks, multi-agent systems, recommendation systems, social networks and service-oriented computing, are briefly introduced from technology, state of the art and scientific challenges standpoints. This roadmap provides not only the necessary background for on-going research activities and projects, but also the solid foundations for deciding on potential future research on trust evaluation in broader contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.gnutella.com/

  2. 2.

    http://www.eBay.com/

  3. 3.

    http://www.paypal.com.au/

  4. 4.

    http://qualities-of-a-leader.com/personal-mbti-type-analysis/

  5. 5.

    http://www.facebook.com

  6. 6.

    http://myspace.com

  7. 7.

    http://flickr.com

  8. 8.

    Refer to the Reuters news “eBay and Facebook unveil e-commerce partnership” at http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/12/ebay-facebook-idUSN1E79B22Y20111012.

  9. 9.

    http://www.epinions.com/

  10. 10.

    http://www.youtube.com/

References

  1. P. S. Adler. Market, hierarchy, and trust: The knowledge economy and the future of capitalism. Organization Science, 12(2):215–234, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Bakhtin. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. University of Texas Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. Barber. The logic and limits of trust. Rutgers University Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. Bedi, H. Kaur, and S. Marwaha. Trust based recommender system for semantic web. In IJCAI 2007, pages 2677–2682, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. Berscheid and H. T. Reis. Attraction and Close Relationships in The Handbook of Social Psychology. Oxford University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. D. Boon and J. G. Holmes. The dynamics of interpersonal trust: Resolving uncertainty in the face of risk. In R. Hinde and J. Groebel, editors, Cooperation and Prosocial Behavior, pages 167–182. Cambridge Univ. Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. B. Brewer. In-group favoritism: the subtle side of intergroup discrimination. In D. M. Messick and A. E. Tenbrunsel, editors, Codes of Conduct: Behavioral Research and Business Ethics, pages 160–171. Russell Sage Found, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. S. Burt and M. Knez. Kinds of third-party effects on trust. Rationality and Society, 7:255–292, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  9. C. Castelfranchi and R. Falcone. Trust is much more than subjective probability: Mental components and sources of trust. In HICSS 2000, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Coleman. Foundations of Social Theory. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Collins. Sociological Insight: an Introduction to Non-obvious Sociology. Oxford University Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  12. W. Conner, A. Iyengar, T. A. Mikalsen, I. Rouvellou, and K. Nahrstedt. A trust management framework for service-oriented environments. In WWW 2009, pages 891–900, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. W. Creed and R. E. Miles. Trust in organizations: a conceptual framework linking organizational forms, managerial philosophies, and the opportunity costs of controls. In R. Kramer and T. Tyler, editors, Trust in organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, pages 16–38. Sage Publications, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  14. E. Damiani, S. D. C. di Vimercati, S. Paraboschi, P. Samarati, and F. Violante. A reputation-based approach for choosing reliable resources in peer-to-peer networks. In ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS 2002), pages 207–216, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  15. E. Damiani, S. D. C. di Vimercati, P. Samarati, and M. Viviani. A wowa-based aggregation technique on trust values connected to metadata. Electr. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci., 157(3):131–142, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Deshpande and G. Karypis. Item-based top- n recommendation algorithms. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 22(1):143–177, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  17. E. Erikson. Identity: Youth and Crisis. W. W. Norton & Company, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. Fiske. Social Beings: Core Motives in Social Psychology. John Wiley and Sons Press, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. Golbeck. Generating predictive movie recommendations from trust in social networks. In iTrust 2006, pages 93–104, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Golbeck and J. A. Hendler. Inferring binary trust relationships in web-based social networks. ACM Trans. Internet Techn., 6(4):497–529, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  21. N. Griffiths. Task delegation using experience-based multi-dimensional trust. In AAMAS 2005, pages 489–496, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  22. R. V. Guha, R. Kumar, P. Raghavan, and A. Tomkins. Propagation of trust and distrust. In WWW 2004, pages 403–412, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. E. Haddad, M. Manouvrier, G. Ramirez, and M. Rukoz. QoS-driven selection of web services for transactional composition. In ICWS 2008, pages 653–660, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  24. C.-W. Hang, Y. Wang, and M. P. Singh. Operators for propagating trust and their evaluation in social networks. In AAMAS 2009, pages 1025–1032, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. L. Herlocker, J. A. Konstan, A. Borchers, and J. Riedl. An algorithmic framework for performing collaborative filtering. In SIGIR 1999, pages 230–237, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  26. T. D. Huynh, N. R. Jennings, and N. R. Shadbolt. An integrated trust and reputation model for open multi-agent systems. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 13(2):119–154, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  27. R. Jeffrey. Subjective Probability: The Real Thing. Cambridge University Press, April 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  28. A. Jøsang. Subjective evidential reasoning. In IPMU 2002, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  29. A. Jøsang, R. Ismail, and C. Boyd. A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision. Decision Support Systems, 43(2):618–644, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  30. S. D. Kamvar, M. T. Schlosser, and H. Garcia-Molina. The eigentrust algorithm for reputation management in p2p networks. In WWW 2003, pages 640–651, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  31. D. H. Knight and N. L. Chervany. The meaning of trust. Technical Report WP9604, University of Minnesota, Management Information Systems Research Center, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  32. R. M. Kramer. Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50:569–598, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  33. U. Kuter and J. Golbeck. Sunny: A new algorithm for trust inference in social networks using probabilistic confidence models. In AAAI 2007, pages 1377–1382, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  34. U. Kuter and J. Golbeck. Using probabilistic confidence models for trust inference in web-based social networks. ACM Trans. Internet Techn., 10(2), 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  35. R. J. Lewicki and B. B. Bunker. Trust in relationships: a model of trust development and decline. In B. Bunker and J. Rubin, editors, Conflict, Cooperation, and Justice. Jossey-Bass, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  36. L. Li. Trust Evaluation in Service-Oriented Environments. PhD thesis, Macquarie University, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  37. L. Li and Y. Wang. A trust vector approach to service-oriented applications. In ICWS 2008, pages 270–277, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  38. L. Li and Y. Wang. Trust evaluation in composite services selection and discovery. In IEEE SCC 2009, pages 482–485, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  39. L. Li and Y. Wang. Subjective trust inference in composite services. In AAAI 2010, pages 1377–1384, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  40. L. Li and Y. Wang. A subjective probability based deductive approach to global trust evaluation in composite services. In ICWS 2011, pages 604–611, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  41. L. Li and Y. Wang. The study of trust vector based trust rating aggregation in service-oriented environments. World Wide Web, In press, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  42. L. Li, Y. Wang, and E.-P. Lim. Trust-oriented composite service selection and discovery. In ICSOC/ServiceWave 2009, pages 50–67, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  43. L. Li, Y. Wang, and V. Varadharajan. Fuzzy regression based trust prediction in service-oriented applications. In ATC 2009, pages 221–235, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  44. M. Li, X. Sun, H. Wang, Y. Zhang, and J. Zhang. Privacy-aware access control with trust management in web service. World Wide Web, 14(4):407–430, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  45. G. Liu, Y. Wang, and L. Li. Trust management in three generations of web-based social networks. In CPSC 2009, pages 446–451, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  46. G. Liu, Y. Wang, and M. A. Orgun. Optimal social trust path selection in complex social networks. In AAAI 2010, pages 1391–1398, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  47. G. Liu, Y. Wang, and M. A. Orgun. Quality of trust for social trust path selection in complex social networks. In AAMAS 2010, pages 1575–1576, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  48. G. Liu, Y. Wang, M. A. Orgun, and E.-P. Lim. A heuristic algorithm for trust-oriented service provider selection in complex social networks. In IEEE SCC 2010, pages 130–137, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  49. H. Ma, H. Yang, M. R. Lyu, and I. King. Sorec: social recommendation using probabilistic matrix factorization. In CIKM 2008, pages 931–940, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  50. H. Ma, T. C. Zhou, M. R. Lyu, and I. King. Improving recommender systems by incorporating social contextual information. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 29(2):9, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Z. Malik and A. Bouguettaya. Rater credibility assessment in web services interactions. World Wide Web, 12(1):3–25, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Z. Malik and A. Bouguettaya. RATEWeb: Reputation assessment for trust establishment among web services. VLDB J., 18(4):885–911, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  53. J. G. March. Primer on Decision Making: How Decisions Happen. Free Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  54. I. Marková. Trust and Democratic Transition in Post-Communist Europe. Oxford University Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  55. I. Marková, A. Gillespie, and J. Valsiner. Trust and Distrust: Sociocultural Perspectives. Information Age Publishing, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  56. S. Marsh. Formalising Trust as a Computational Concept. University of Stirling, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  57. S. Marti and H. Garcia-Molina. Limited reputation sharing in p2p systems. In ACM EC 2004, pages 91–101, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  58. B. Medjahed and A. Bouguettaya. A multilevel composability model for semantic web services. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 17(7):954–968, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  59. B. Medjahed, A. Bouguettaya, and A. K. Elmagarmid. Composing web services on the semantic web. VLDB J., 12(4):333–351, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  60. D. A. Menascé. Composing web services: A QoS view. IEEE Internet Computing, 8(6):88–90, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  61. S. Milgram. The small world problem. Psychology Today, 2(30), 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  62. R. Miller, D. Perlman, and S. Brehm. Intimate Relationships. McGraw-Hill College Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  63. A. Mislove, M. Marcon, P. K. Gummadi, P. Druschel, and B. Bhattacharjee. Measurement and analysis of online social networks. In Internet Measurement Conference 2007, pages 29–42, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  64. B. Misztal. Trust in Modern Societies: The Search for the Bases of Social Order. Polity Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  65. R. J. Mooney and L. Roy. Content-based book recommending using learning for text categorization. In ACM DL 2000, pages 195–204, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  66. L. Mui. Computational Models of Trust and Reputation: Agents, Evolutionary Games, and Social Networks. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dec 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  67. M. P. Papazoglou, P. Traverso, S. Dustdar, and F. Leymann. Service-oriented computing: a research roadmap. Int. J. Cooperative Inf. Syst., 17(2):223–255, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  68. I. Ray and S. Chakraborty. A vector model of trust for developing trustworthy systems. In 9th European Symposium on Research Computer, Security, pages 260–275, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  69. J. B. Rotter. Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and gullibility. American Psychologist, 35(1):1–7, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  70. J. Sabater and C. Sierra. REGRET: reputation in gregarious societies. In Agents 2001, pages 194–195, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  71. B. M. Sarwar, G. Karypis, J. A. Konstan, and J. Riedl. Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms. In WWW 2001, pages 285–295, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  72. A. B. Seligman. The Problem of Trust. Princeton University Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  73. G. Simmel. The Sociology of Georg Simmel. The, Free Press, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  74. R. R. Sinha and K. Swearingen. Comparing recommendations made by online systems and friends. In DELOS Workshop 2001: Personalisation and Recommender Systems in Digital Libraries, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  75. S. Song, K. Hwang, R. Zhou, and Y.-K. Kwok. Trusted p2p transactions with fuzzy reputation aggregation. IEEE Internet Computing, 9(6):24–34, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  76. T. Strang, C. Linnhoff-Popien, and K. Frank. Cool: A context ontology language to enable contextual interoperability. In IFIP WG6.1 International Conference on Distributed Applications and Interoperable Systems 2003, pages 236–247, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  77. W. T. L. Teacy, J. Patel, N. R. Jennings, and M. Luck. Travos: Trust and reputation in the context of inaccurate information sources. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 12(2):183–198, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  78. S. Toivonen, G. Lenzini, and I. Uusitalo. Context-aware trust evaluation functions for dynamic reconfigurable systems. In Proceedings of the WWW’06 Workshop on Models of Trust for the Web (MTW’06), 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  79. B. Uzzi. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1):35–67, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  80. P. Victor, C. Cornelis, M. D. Cock, and P. P. da Silva. Gradual trust and distrust in recommender systems. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 160(10):1367–1382, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  81. L.-H. Vu, M. Hauswirth, and K. Aberer. QoS-based service selection and ranking with trust and reputation management. In CoopIS 2005, pages 466–483, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  82. F. E. Walter, S. Battiston, and F. Schweitzer. A model of a trust-based recommendation system on a social network. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 16(1):57–74, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Y. Wang and L. Li. Two-dimensional trust rating aggregations in service-oriented applications. IEEE T. Services Computing, 4(4):257–271, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Y. Wang, L. Li, and E.-P. Lim. Price trust evaluation in e-service oriented applications. In CEC/EEE 2008, pages 165–172, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Y. Wang and E.-P. Lim. The evaluation of situational transaction trust in e-service environments. In ICEBE 2008, pages 265–272, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Y. Wang and K.-J. Lin. Reputation-oriented trustworthy computing in e-commerce environments. IEEE Internet Computing, 12(4):55–59, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Y. Wang, K.-J. Lin, D. S. Wong, and V. Varadharajan. Trust management towards service-oriented applications. Service Oriented Computing and Applications, 3(2):129–146, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Y. Wang and M. P. Singh. Formal trust model for multiagent systems. In International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2007), pages 1551–1556, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Y. Wang and V. Varadharajan. Role-based recommendation and trust evaluation. In CEC/EEE 2007, pages 278–288, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  90. J. Xiao and R. Boutaba. QoS-aware service composition and adaptation in autonomic communication. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 23(12):2344–2360, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  91. L. Xiong and L. Liu. Peer Trust: Supporting reputation-based trust for peer-to-peer electronic communities. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 16(7):843–857, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Z. Xu, P. Martin, W. Powley, and F. Zulkernine. Reputation-enhanced QoS-based web services discovery. In ICWS 2007, pages 249–256, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  93. I. Yaniv. Receiving other peoples’ advice: Influence and benefit. J. Artif. Intell. Res. (JAIR), 93(1).

    Google Scholar 

  94. B. Yu, M. P. Singh, and K. Sycara. Developing trust in large-scale peer-to-peer systems. IEEE Symposium on Multi-Agent Security and Survivability, pages 1–10, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  95. H. Yu, M. Kaminsky, P. B. Gibbons, and A. D. Flaxman. Sybilguard: defending against sybil attacks via social networks. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., 16(3):576–589, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  96. T. Yu, Y. Zhang, and K.-J. Lin. Efficient algorithms for web services selection with end-to-end Qos constraints. TWEB, 1(1), 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  97. G. Zacharia and P. Maes. Trust management through reputation mechanisms. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 14(9):881–907, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  98. L. Zeng, B. Benatallah, M. Dumas, J. Kalagnanam, and Q. Z. Sheng. Quality driven web services composition. In WWW 2003, pages 411–421, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  99. H. Zhao and X. Li. Vectortrust: Trust vector aggregation scheme for trust management in peer-to-peer networks. In 18th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks, pages 1–6, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  100. R. Zhou and K. Hwang. Powertrust: A robust and scalable reputation system for trusted peer-to-peer computing. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst., 18(4):460–473, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lei Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Li, L., Wang, Y. (2014). The Roadmap of Trust and Trust Evaluation in Web Applications and Web Services. In: Bouguettaya, A., Sheng, Q., Daniel, F. (eds) Advanced Web Services. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7535-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7535-4_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7534-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7535-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics