Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Building Sustainable Information Systems pp 113–125Cite as

A Social-Creative-Cognitive (SCC) Model for Requirements Engineering

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Abstract

This paper describes a research project and the findings from a set of six cases which examine professional requirements engineering (RE) practice from the perspective of how analysts reach agreement on system requirements for information systems development (ISD). In these studies, it was found that the analysts reached agreement on requirements with clients through communication and negotiation based on both analysts’ cognitive skills in problem-solving and creative skills in developing informal models that could be used in the negotiation of agreement and sign-off on requirements specifications. A theoretical model of social-creative-cognitive (SCC) aspects of requirements engineering is proposed encompassing the empirical findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Avison D, Fitzgerald G (2003) Information systems development: methodologies, techniques and tools, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, Maidenhead

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bacharach S (1988) Organizational theories: some criteria for evaluation. Acad Manag Rev 14(4):496–515

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brown RBK, Piper IC (2011) What users do: SA&D with the ATSA method. Paper presented at the 20th international conference on information systems development (ISD2011), Edinburgh, UK

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carbone A, Lynch K, Arnott D, Jamieson P (2000) Adopting a studio-based education approach into information technology. Paper presented at the 4th Australasian computing education conference (ACE2000), Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  5. Checkland P, Scholes J (1990) Soft systems methodology in practice. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  6. Conboy K (2010) Project failure en masse: a study of loose budgetary control in ISD projects. Eur J Inform Syst 19(3):273–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Coughlan J, Macredie RD (2002) Effective communication in requirements elicitation: a comparison of methodologies. Requirements Eng 7(2):47–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Darke P, Shanks G (1996) Stakeholder viewpoints in requirements definition: a framework for understanding viewpoint development approaches. Requirements Eng 1:88–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dawson L (2008) Active exploration of emerging themes in a study of object-oriented requirements engineering: the “Evolutionary Case” approach. Electron J Bus Res Meth 6(1):29–42

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dawson L (2011) Cognitive processes in object-oriented requirements engineering practice: analogical reasoning and mental modelling. Paper presented at the 20th international conference on information systems development (ISD2011), Edinburgh, UK

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dawson L, Darke P (2002) The adoption and adaptation of object-oriented methodologies in requirements engineering practice. Paper presented at the 10th European conference on information systems, Gdansk, Poland

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dawson L, Swatman P (1999) The use of object-oriented models in requirements engineering: a field study. Paper presented at the 20th international conference on information systems, Charlotte, NC

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dubin R (1976) Theory building in applied areas. In: Dunnette M (ed) Handbook of industrial and organisational psychology. Rand McNally College Publications, Chicago, IL, pp 17–39

    Google Scholar 

  14. Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management eview 14(4):532–550

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fitzgerald B (1997) The use of systems development methodologies in practice: a field study. Inform Syst J 7:201–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Flynn DJ, Warhurst R (1994) An empirical study of the validation process within requirements determination. Inform Syst J 4:185–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Galal G, McDonnell JT (1998) A qualitative view of requirements engineering. Paper presented at the 3rd Australian conference on requirements engineering, Geelong, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  18. Goguen JA (1994) Requirements engineering as the reconciliation of social and technical issues. In: Jirotka M, Goguen JA (eds) Requirements engineering: social and technical issues. Academic, London

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jackson P, Klobas J (2008) Building knowledge in projects: a practical application of social constructivism to information systems development. Int J Proj Manag 26(4):329–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kavakli E (2002) Goal-oriented requirements engineering: a unifying framework. Requirements Eng 6(4):237–251

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Keen CD, Lockwood C, Lamp J (1998) A client-focused, team-of-teams approach to software development projects. Paper presented at the software engineering: education and practice, Dunedin, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  22. Khushalani A, Smith R, Howard S (1994) What happens when designers don't play by the rules: towards a model of opportunistic behaviour and design. Aust J Inform Syst 1(2):2–31

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lamp J, Lockwood C (2000) Creating realistic experience of an IS project: the team of teams approach. Paper presented at the 2000 IRMA international conference, Alaska

    Google Scholar 

  24. Loucopoulos P, Karakostas V (1995) Systems requirements engineering. McGraw-Hill, London

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lyytinen K, Robey D (1999) Learning failure in information systems development. Inform Syst J 9(2):85–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Macaulay L (1996) Requirements engineering. Springer, London

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Machado R, Borges M, Gomes J (2008) Supporting the system requirements elicitation through collaborative observations. In: Briggs R, Antunes P, de Vreede G-J, Read A (eds) Groupware: design, implementation and use, vol 5411. Springer, Berlin, pp 364–379

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Mathiassen L, Purao S (2002) Educating reflective systems developers. Inform Syst J 12(2):81–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mayer RE (1992) Thinking, problem solving, cognition, 2nd edn. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  30. Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook, 2nd edn. Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nuseibeh B, Kramer J, Finkelstein A (1994) A framework for expressing the relationships between multiple views in requirements specification. IEEE Trans Software Eng 20:760–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Pohl K (1994) The three dimensions of requirements engineering: a framework and its applications. Inform Syst 19(3):243–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Robertson J, Robertson S (1997) Volere requirements specification template, 4th edn. Atlantic Systems Guild, London

    Google Scholar 

  34. Robertson J, Robertson S (2010) Volere product summary. http://www.volere.co.uk/index.htm. Accessed 6 Jul 2012

  35. Schön DA (1983) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  36. Siau K, Rossi M (2011) Evaluation techniques for systems analysis and design modelling methods—a review and comparative analysis. Inform Syst J 21(3):249–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Siau K, Wang Y (2007) Cognitive evaluation of information modeling methods. Inform Software Technol 49(5):455–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sommerville I, Sawyer P (1997) Requirements engineering: a good practice guide. Wiley, Chichester

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Sutcliffe AG, Maiden NAM (1992) Analysing the novice analyst: cognitive models in software engineering. Int J Man Mach Stud 36:719–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Teles VM, de Oliveira CET (2003) Reviewing the curriculum of software engineering undergraduate courses to incorporate communication and interpersonal skills teaching. Paper presented at the software engineering education and training, 2003 (CSEE&T 2003). Proceedings of 16th conference on 20–22 Mar 2003

    Google Scholar 

  41. Urquhart C (1998) Analysts and clients in conversation: cases in early requirements gathering. Paper presented at the 19th international conference on information systems, Helsinki, Finland

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wastell DG (1999) Learning dysfunctions in information systems development: overcoming the social defenses with transitional objects. MIS Quart 23(4):581–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Informatics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia

    Linda Dawson

Authors
  1. Linda Dawson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda Dawson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Monash University, Caaulfield East, Victoria, Australia

    Henry Linger

  2. Monash University, Caulfield East, Victoria, Australia

    Julie Fisher

  3. Box Hill Institute, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia

    Andrew Barnden

  4. National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland

    Chris Barry

  5. National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland

    Michael Lang

  6. City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR

    Christoph Schneider

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dawson, L. (2013). A Social-Creative-Cognitive (SCC) Model for Requirements Engineering. In: Linger, H., Fisher, J., Barnden, A., Barry, C., Lang, M., Schneider, C. (eds) Building Sustainable Information Systems. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7540-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7540-8_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7539-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7540-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation