Skip to main content

Rule Induction by Estimation of Distribution Algorithms

  • Chapter
Estimation of Distribution Algorithms

Part of the book series: Genetic Algorithms and Evolutionary Computation ((GENA,volume 2))

Abstract

In this chapter a preliminary work on the use of Estimation of Distribution Algorithms (EDAs) for the induction of classification rules is presented. Each individual obtained by simulation of the probability distribution learnt in each EDA generation represents a disjunction of a finite number of simple rules. This problem has been modeled to allow representations with different complexities. Experimental results comparing three types of EDAs —UMDA, a dependency tree and EBNAwith two classical algorithms of rule induction —RIPPER and CN2— are shown.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Chow, C. and Liu, C. (1968). Approximating discrete probability distributions with dependence trees. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 14:462–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, P. and Nibblet, T. (1989). The CN2 induction algorithm. Machine Learning, 3(4):261–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. (1995). Fast effective rule induction. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference in Machine Learning, pages 115–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietterich, T. (1998). Approximate statistical tests for comparing supervised learning algorithms. Neural Computation, 10(7):1895–1924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty, J., Kohavi, R., and Sahami, M. (1995). Supervised and unsupervised discretization of continuous features. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference in Machine Learning, pages 194–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etxeberria, R. and Larrañaga, P. (1999). Global optimization with Bayesiannetworks. In II Symposium on Artificial Intelligence. CIMAF99. Special Session on Distributions and Evolutionary Optimization, pages 332–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fidelis, M., Lopes, H., and Freitas, A. (2000). Discovering comprehensible class

    Google Scholar 

  • sification rules with a genetic algorithm. In Proceedings of the Congress on

    Google Scholar 

  • Evolutionary Computation, pages 805–810.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. (1986). A mathematical framework for studying learning in classifier systems. Physica D, 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, K. and Spears, W. (1991). Learning concept classification rules using genetic algorithms. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 651–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kittler, J. (1978). Feature set search algorithms. In Chen, C., editor, Pattern

    Google Scholar 

  • Recognition and Signal Processing, pages 41-60. Sithoff and Noordhoff. Lanzi, P., Stolzmann, W., and Wilson, S. (2000). Learning Classifier Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • From Foundations to Applications Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. and Kwok, J. (2000). An extended genetic rule induction algorithm. In Proceedings of the 2000 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pages 458–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müehlenbein, H. (1998). The equation for response to selection and its use for prediction. Evolutionary Computation, 5:303–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P. (1995). UCI Repository of machine learning databases. University of California, Department of Information and Computer Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muruzábal, J. (1999). Mining the space of generality with uncertainty-concerned, cooperative classifiers. In Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, pages 449–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonas, E. and Poulovassilis, A. (1998). Optimization of active rule agents using a genetic algorithm approach. In DEXA, pages 332–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivera, J. and Santana, R. (1999). Improving the discovery component of classifier systems by the application of Estimation of Distribution Algorithms. In Proceedings of the Student Sessions ACAI’99: Machine Learning and Applications, pages 43–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S. (1998). Generalization in the XCS classifier system. In Proceedings of the Third Genetic Programming Conference.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sierra, B., Jiménez, E.A., Inza, I., Larrañaga, P., Muruzábal, J. (2002). Rule Induction by Estimation of Distribution Algorithms. In: Larrañaga, P., Lozano, J.A. (eds) Estimation of Distribution Algorithms. Genetic Algorithms and Evolutionary Computation, vol 2. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1539-5_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1539-5_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5604-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1539-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics