Abstract
Agent Based Modeling studies group activity by simulating the individuals in it and allowing group-level phenomena to emerge. It can be used to integrate theories to inform designs of technology for groups. Researchers use theories as the basis of the rules of how individuals behave (e.g., what motivates users to contribute to an online community). They can run virtual experiments by changing parameters of the model (e.g., the topical focus in an online community) to see what collective behaviors emerge.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Another rare form of model validation is called model alignment or “docking” in short, under which researchers compare two or more models to see if they can produce the same results. A good example is Axtell and colleagues’ work (1996) to align the cultural transmission model and the Sugarscape model. They call for wider practice of docking among modelers.
References
Axelrod, R. (1986). An evolutionary approach to norms. American Political Science Review, 80, 1095–1111.
Axelrod, R. (1997). The complexity of cooperation: Agent based models of competition and collaboration. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Axelrod, R. (1997a). The dissemination of culture: A model with local convergence and global polarization. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41, 203–226.
Axelrod, R. (1997b). The complexity of cooperation: Agent-based models of competition and collaboration. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Axelrod, R. (2005). Agent-based modeling as a bridge between disciplines. In K. L. Judd, & L. Tesfatsion (Eds.), Handbook of Computational Economics, Vol. 2: Agent-Based Computational Economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Bao, P., Hecht, B., Carton, S., Quaderi, M., Horn, M., & Gergle, D. (2012). Omnipedia: Bridging the Wikipedia language gap. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human-Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1075–1084). New York: ACM Press.
Berscheid, E. (1994). Interpersonal relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 79–129.
Bryant, S. L., Forte, A., & Bruckman, A. (2005). Becoming Wikipedian: Transformation of participation in a collaborative online encyclopedia. Proceedings of the 2005 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work (pp. 1–10). New York: ACM.
Burton, R. M., & Obel, B. (1995). The validity of computational models in organization science: From model realism to purpose of the model. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 1(1), 57–71.
Butler, B. S. (2001). Membership size, communication activity, and sustainability: A resource-based model of online social structures. Information Systems Research, 12(4), 346–362.
Carley, K. M. (1991). A theory of group stability. American Sociological Review, 56(3), 331–354.
Carley, K. M. (1992). Organizational learning and personnel turnover. Organizational Science, 3(1), 20–46.
Carley, K.M. (1996). Validating computational models. Working paper, Pittsburgh, PA.
Chatman, J. A., & Flynn, F. J. (2005). Full-cycle micro-organizational behavior research. Organization Science, 16(4), 434–447.
Davis, J., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bingham, C. B. (2007). Developing theory through simulation methods. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 480–499.
DiMicco, J., Millen, D. R., Geyer, W., Dugan, C., Brownholtz, B., & Muller, M. (2008). Motivations for social networking at work. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human-Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 711–720). New York: ACM Press.
Drenner, S., Sen, S., & Terveen, L. (2008). Crafting the initial user experience to achieve community goals. Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. (pp. 187–194). New York, NY: ACM
Epstein, J. M., & Axtell, R. L. (1996). Growing artificial societies: Social science from the bottom up. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
Epstein, J. M. (1999). Agent-based computational models and generative social science. Complexity, 4(5), 41–60.
Faraj, S., & Johnson, S. L. (2011). Network exchange patterns in online communities. Organization Science, 22(6), 1464–1480.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes (Vol. 7). Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
Fisher, D., Smith, M., & Welser, H.T. (2006). You are who you talk to: Detecting roles in Usenet newsgroups: Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences in Waikoloa, Big Island, Hawaii.
Fogarty, J., Lai, J., & Christensen, J. (2004). Presence versus availability: The design and evaluation of a context-aware communication client. International Journal Human-Computer Studies, 61(3), 299–317.
Frank, F., & Anderson, L. R. (1971). Effects of task and group size upon group productivity and member satisfaction. Sociometry, 34(1), 135–149.
Gardner, M. (1970). Mathematical games: The fantastic combinations of John Conway’s new solitaire game “life”. Scientific American, 223, 120–123.
Gilbert, N. (2008). Agent-based models. In T. F. Liao (Ed.), Quantitative applications in the social sciences. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Grudin, J. (1994). Groupware and social dynamics: Eight challenges for developers. Communications of ACM, 37(1), 92–105.
Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1989). Organizational ecology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Harper, F.M., Frankowski, D., Drenner, S., Ren, Y., Kiesler, S., Terveen, L., Kraut, R. E., & Riedl, J. T. (2007). Talk amongst yourselves: Inviting users to participate in online conversations. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (pp. 62–71). Honolulu, Hawaii.
Harrison, J. R., & Carroll, G. R. (1991). Keeping the faith: A model of cultural transmission in formal organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(4), 552–582.
Harrison, J. R., Lin, Z., Carroll, G. R., & Carley, K. M. (2007). Simulation modeling in organizational and management research. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1229–1245.
Hogg, M. A. (1996). Social identity, self-categorization, and the small group. In E. H. Witte & J. H. Davis (Eds.), Small group processes and interpersonal relations (2nd ed., pp. 227–253). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Jones, Q., Ravid, G., & Rafaeli, S. (2004). Information overload and the message dynamics of online interaction spaces: A theoretical model and empirical exploration. Information Systems Research, 15(2), 194–210.
Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 681–706.
Kluger, A., & DeNisi, A. (1996). Effects of feedback intervention on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254.
Kozlowski, K. J., & Klein, S. W. J. (2000). Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: foundations, extensions, and new directions (Society for industrial and organizational psychology frontier series). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Kraut, R. E., & Resnick, P. (2012). Building successful online communities: Evidence-based social design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ling, K., Beenen, G., Ludford, P. J., Wang, X., Chang, K., Li, X., et al. (2005). Using social psychology to motivate contributions to online communities. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 10(4), article 10.
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.
Macy, M. W. (1991). Chains of cooperation: Threshold effects in collective action. American Sociological Review, 56(6), 730–747.
Macy, M. W., & Willer, R. (2002). From factors to actors: Computational sociology and agent based modeling. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 143–166.
Maloney-Krichmar, D., & Preece, J. (2005). A multilevel analysis of sociability, usability, and community dynamics in an online health community. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 12(2), 201–232.
Markus, M. L. (1987). Towards a “critical mass” theory of interactive media: Universal access, interdependence, and diffusion. Communication Research, 14(5), 491–511.
Mathieu, J., & Zajac, D. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 171–194.
Myers, B., Hudson, S. E., & Pausch, R. (2000). Past, present, and future of user interface software tools. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(1), 3–28.
Nan, N. (2011). Capturing bottom-up information technology use processes: A complex adaptive systems model. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 505–532.
Nan, N., Johnston, E., & Olson, J. (2008). Unintended consequences in central-remote office arrangements: A study coupling laboratory experiment with multi-agent simulation. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 14(2), 57–83.
Nan, N., Johnston, E. W., Olson, J. S., & Bos, N. (2005). Beyond being in the lab: Using multi-agent modeling to isolate competing hypotheses. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human-Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1693–1696). New York: ACM Press.
Orlikowski, W. J. (1996). Improvising organizational transformation over time: A situated change perspective. Information Systems Research, 7(1), 63–92.
Perlow, L. A. (1999). The time famine: Toward a sociology of work time. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 57–81.
Preece, J. (2000). Online communities: designing usability supporting sociability. Chichester: Wiley.
Prentice, D. A., Miller, D. T., & Lightdale, J. R. (1994). Asymmetries in attachments to groups and to their members: Distinguishing between common-identity and common-bond groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 484–493.
Ren, Y., Carley, K. M., & Argote, L. (2006). The contingency effects of transactive memory: When is it more beneficial to know what others know? Management Science, 52(5), 671–682.
Ren, Y., Harper, F. M., Drenner, S., Terveen, L., Kiesler, S., Riedl, J., & Kraut, R. E. (2012). Building member attachment in online communities: Applying theories of group identity and interpersonal bonds. MIS Quarterly, 36(3), 841-864.
Ren, Y., & Kraut, R. E. (In press). Agent-based modeling to inform online community design: Impact of topical breadth, message volume, and discussion moderation on member commitment and contribution. Human-Computer Interaction.
Ren, Y., Kraut, R. E., & Kiesler, S. (2007). Applying common identity and bond theory to design of online communities. Organization Studies, 28(3), 377–408.
Reynolds, C. W. (1987). Flocks, herds, and schools: A distributed behavioral model. Computer Graphics, 21(4), 25–34.
Ridings, C. M., & Gefen, D. (2004). Virtual community attraction: Why people hang out online. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 10(1), article 4.
Roberts, J., Hann, I., & Slaughter, S. (2006). Understanding the motivations, participation, and performance of open source software development: A longitudinal study of the Apache projects. Management Science, 52(7), 984–1000.
Rogers, E. M., & Agarwala-Rogers, R. (1975). Organizational communication. In G. L. Hanneman & W. J. McEwen (Eds.), Communication behavior (pp. 218–236). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Sawyer, R. K. (2003). Artificial societies: Multiagent systems and the micro-macro link in sociological theory. Sociological Methods & Research, 31, 325–363.
Schelling, T. C. (1969). Models of segregation. American Economic Review, 59(2), 488–493.
Schelling, T. (1971). Dynamic models of segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1, 143–186.
Shami, N. S., Ehrlich, K., Gay, G., & Hancock, J. T. (2009). Making sense of strangers’ expertise from signals in digital artifacts. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human-Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 69–78). New York: ACM Press.
Shapiro, C., & Varian, H. R. (1999). Information rules: A strategic guide to the network economy. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Smith, M. A. (1999). Invisible crowds in cyberspace: measuring and mapping the social structure of USENET. In M. A. Smith & P. Kollock (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace: Perspective on new forms of social organization (pp. 195–219). London: Routledge.
Strang, D., & Macy, M. (2001). “In search of excellence:” fads, success stories, and adaptive emulation. American Journal of Sociology, 107(1), 147–182.
Taber, C. S., & Timpone, R. J. (1996). Computational modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Thom-Santelli, J., Millen, D. R., & Gergle, D. (2011). Organizational acculturation and social networking. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 313–316). New York: ACM Press.
Treem, J. W., & Leonardi, P. M. (2012). Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Communication Yearbook, 36, 142–189.
Vroom, V., Porter, L., & Lawler, E. (2005). Expectancy theories. In J. B. Miner (Ed.), Organizational behavior 1: Essential theories of motivation and leadership (pp. 94–113). New York, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
Wasko, M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 35–58.
Welser, H. T., Cosley, D., Kossinets, G., Lin, A., Dokshin, F., Gay, G., & Smith, M. (2011). Finding social roles in Wikipedia. Proceedings of the 2011 iConference.
Wilensky, U. (1999). NetLogo. Evanston, IL: Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University.
Wu, A., DiMicco, J. M., & Millen, D. R. (2010). Detecting professional versus personal closeness using an expertise social network site. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human-Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1955–1964). New York: ACM Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ren, Y., Kraut, R.E. (2014). Agent Based Modeling to Inform the Design of Multiuser Systems. In: Olson, J., Kellogg, W. (eds) Ways of Knowing in HCI. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0378-8_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0378-8_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-0377-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-0378-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)