Skip to main content

Utilitarian Mechanism Design for Single-Minded Agents

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Algorithms

Years and Authors of Summarized Original Work

  • 2005; Briest, Krysta, Vöcking

Problem Definition

This problem deals with the design of efficiently computable incentive compatible, or truthful, mechanisms for combinatorial optimization problems with selfish one-parameter agents and a single seller. The focus is on approximation algorithms for NP-hard mechanism design problems. These algorithms need to satisfy certain monotonicity properties to ensure truthfulness.

one parameter agent is an agent who as her private data has some resource as well as a valuation, i.e., the maximum amount of money she is willing to pay for this resource. Sometimes, however, the resource is assumed to be known to the mechanism. The scenario where a single seller offers these resources to the agents is primarily considered. Typically, the seller aims at maximizing the social welfare or her revenue. The work by Briest, Krysta and Vöcking [6] will mostly be considered, but also other existing models and...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 1,599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the case of unknown single-minded bidders, the bidders have as private data not only their valuations (as in the case of known single-minded bidders) but also the sets they demand.

Recommended Reading

  1. Andelman N, Mansour Y (2006) A sufficient condition for truthfulness with single parameter agents. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on electronic commerce (EC), Ann Arbor, June 2006

    Google Scholar 

  2. Archer A, Papadimitriou CH, Talwar K, Tardos E (2003) An approximate truthful mechanism for combinatorial auctions with single parameter agents. In: Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM–SIAM symposium on discrete algorithms (SODA), Baltimore, pp 205–214

    Google Scholar 

  3. Awerbuch B, Azar Y, Meyerson A (2003) Reducing truth-telling online mechanisms to online optimization. In: Proceedings of the 35th annual ACM symposium on theory of computing (STOC), San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  4. Azar Y, Gamzu I, Gutner S (2007) Truthful unsplittable flow for large capacity networks. In: Proceedings of the 19th annual ACM symposium on parallelism in algorithms and architectures (SPAA), pp 320–329

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bartal Y, Gonen R, Nisan N (2003) Incentive compatible multi unit combinatorial auctions. In: Proceedings of the 9th conference on theoretical aspects of rationality and knowledge (TARK), ACM Press, pp 72–87. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/846241.846250

  6. Briest P, Krysta P, Vöcking B (2005) Approximation techniques for utilitarian mechanism design. In: Proceedings of the 37th annual ACM symposium on theory of computing (STOC), pp 39–48

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fiat A, Goldberg AV, Hartline JD, Karlin AR (2002) Competitive generalized auctions. In: Proceedings of the 34th annual ACM symposium on theory of computing (STOC), pp 72–81

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goldberg AV, Hartline JD, Wright A (2001) Competitive auctions and digital goods. In: Proceedings of the 12th annual ACM–SIAM symposium on discrete algorithms (SODA), pp 735–744

    Google Scholar 

  9. Krysta P (2005) Greedy approximation via duality for packing, combinatorial auctions and routing. In: Proceedings of the 30th international conference on mathematical foundations of computer science (MFCS). Lecture notes in computer science, vol 3618, pp 615–627

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lehmann DJ, O'Callaghan LI, Shoham Y (1999) Truth revelation in approximately efficient combinatorial auctions. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM conference on electronic commerce (EC), pp 96–102

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mu'alem A, Nisan N (2002) Truthful approximation mechanisms for restricted combinatorial auctions. In: Proceedings of the 18th national conference on artificial intelligence. AAAI, pp 379–384

    Google Scholar 

  12. Myerson RB (1981) Optimal auction design. Math Oper Res 6:58–73

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Ronen A (2001) On approximating optimal auctions (extended abstract). In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM conference on electronic commerce (EC), pp 11–17

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ronen A, Saberi A (2002) On the hardness of optimal auctions. In: Proceedings of the 43rd annual IEEE symposium on foundations of computer science (FOCS), pp 396–405

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Piotr Krysta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Krysta, P., Vöcking, B. (2016). Utilitarian Mechanism Design for Single-Minded Agents. In: Kao, MY. (eds) Encyclopedia of Algorithms. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2864-4_454

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics