Skip to main content

Query Answering in the Semantic Social Web: An Argumentation-Based Approach

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 2,500.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adomavicius G, Tuzhilin A (2005) Toward the next generation of recommender systems: a survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 17(6):734–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amgoud L, Cayrol C (2002) Inferring from inconsistency in preference- based argumentation frameworks. J Auton Reason 29(2):125–169

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bench-Capon TJM, Dunne PE (2007) Argumentation in artificial intelligence. Artif Intell 171(10–15):619–641

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Besnard P, Hunter A (2001) A logic-based theory of deductive arguments. Artif Intell 128(1–2):203–235

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bex F, Lawrence J, Snaith M, Reed C (2013) Implementing the argument web. Commun ACM 56(10):66–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bobadilla J, Ortega F, Hernando A, Gutiérrez A (2013) Recommender systems survey. Knowl-Based Syst 46:109–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti S, Everett M (2006) A graph-theoretic perspective on centrality. Soc Networks 28(4):466–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breslin JG, Harth A, Bojars U, Decker S (2005) Towards semantically-interlinked online communities. In: 2nd European conference on The Semantic Web: research and Applications, ESWC. Springer, Berlin, pp 500–514

    Google Scholar 

  • Breslin JG, Passant A, Decker S (2009) The social semantic web, 1st edn. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated, New York, USA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Briguez CE, Budán MC, Deagustini CAD, Maguitman AG, Capobianco M, Simari GR (2014) Argument-based mixed recommenders and their application to movie suggestion. Expert Syst Appl 41(14):6467–6482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bröcheler M, Pugliese A, Subrahmanian VS (2009) Dogma: a disk-oriented graph matching algorithm for rdf databases. In: Proceedings of the international semantic web conference, pp 97–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Bröcheler M, Shakarian P, Subrahmanian VS (2010) A scalable framework for modeling competitive diffusion in social networks. In: Proceedings of SocialCom/PASSAT, pp 295–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Bröcheler M, Pugliese A, Subrahmanian VS (2011) A budget-based algorithm for efficient subgraph matching on huge networks. In: ICDE workshops, pp 94–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Budán MC, Lucero MJG, Viglizzo ID, Simari GR (2015) A labeled argumentation framework. J Appl Log 13(4):534–553

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cha M, Mislove A, Gummadi KP (2009) A measurement-driven analysis of information propagation in the flickr social network. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World Wide Web, WWW. ACM, New York, pp 721–730

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesñevar CI, McGinnis J, Modgil S, Rahwan I, Reed C, Simari GR, South M, Vreeswijk G, Willmott S (2006) Towards an argument interchange format. Knowl Eng Rev 21(4):293–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briguez CE, Capobianco M, Maguitman AG (2013) A theoretical framework for trust-based news recommender systems and its implementation using defeasible argumentation, Int J Artif Intell Tools 22(4)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Noia T, Ostuni VC (2015) Reasoning Web. Web logic rules: 11th international summer school 2015, Berlin, 31 July – 4 Aug 2015, Tutorial Lectures. Chapter Recommender Systems and Linked Open Data, pp 88–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Dung PM (1995) On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif Intell 77(2):321–358

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fan W, Wang X, Wu Y (2014) Querying big graphs within bounded resources. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGMOD international conference on management of data, pp 301–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazzinga B, Gianforme G, Gottlob G, Lukasiewicz T (2010) Semantic web search based on ontological conjunctive queries. In: Link S, Prade H (eds) Foundations of information and knowledge systems, volume 5956 of Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 153–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman LC (1977) A set of measures of centrality based on Betweenness. Sociometry 40(1):35–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman LC (1978) Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc Networks 215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friendfeed. http://friendfeed.com/

  • García AJ, Simari GR (2004) Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach. Theory Practice Logic Programming (TPLP) 4:95–138

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gottifredi S, García AJ, Simari GR (2011) Argument types and typed argumentation frameworks. In: Theory and applications of formal argumentation. Lecture notes in computer science book series (LNCS), vol 9524. Springer International Publishing Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Harth A, Umbrich J, Hogan A, Decker S (2007) Yars2: a federated repository for querying graph structured data from the web. In: Proceedings of ISWC/ASWC, pp 211–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Heras S, Atkinson K, Botti V, Grasso F, Julian V, McBurney P (2010) How argumentation can enhance dialogues in social networks. In: 3rd international conference on computational models of argument. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 267–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Heras S, Atkinson K, Botti VJ, Grasso F, Julián V, McBurney P (2013) Research opportunities for argumentation in social networks. Artif Intell Rev 39(1):39–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MO, Yariv L (2006) Diffusion on social networks. Working papers 1251. California Institute of Technology, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences. Economie Publique, No. 15 2005/1, pp. 3–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang C, Molinaro C, Kraus S, Shavitt Y, Subrahmanian VS (2012) Diffusion centrality in social networks, In: International conference on advances in social networks analysis and mining

    Google Scholar 

  • Mugnier M (2011) Ontological query answering with existential rules, In: 25th international workshop on description logics, pp 2–23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • NEPOMUK social semantic desktop. http://nepomuk.semanticdesktop .org/ nepomuk/

  • Pak A, Paroubek P (2010) Twitter as a corpus for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on language resources and evaluation

    Google Scholar 

  • Peis E, Morales del Castillo JM, Delgado-Lpez JA (2008) Semantic recommender systems. analysis of the state of the topic. Hipertext.net, 6, (online)

  • Prakken H (2005) Coherence and flexibility in dialogue games for argumentation. J Log Comput 15(6):1009–1040

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Prakken H (2010) An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments. Argument Comput 1(1):93–124

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Pugliese A, Bröcheler M, Subrahmanian VS, Ovelgönne M (2014) Efficient multiview maintenance under insertion in huge social networks. ACM Trans Web 8(2):1–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahwan I, Simari GR (2009) Argumentation in artificial intelligence, 1st edn. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahwan I, Zablith F, Reed C (2007) Laying the foundations for a world wide argument web. Artif Intell 171(10–15):897–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahwan I, Banihashemi B, Reed C, Walton D, Abdallah S (2011) Representing and classifying arguments on the semantic web. Knowl Eng Rev 26(4):487–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ronen R, Shmueli O (2009) Evaluating very large datalog queries on social networks. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on extending database technology: advances in database technology, EDBT. ACM, New York, pp 577–587

    Google Scholar 

  • Subrahmanian VS, Reforgiato Recupero D (2008) Ava: adjective-verb- adverb combinations for sentiment analysis. IEEE Intell Syst 23(4):43–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Friend of a Friend (FOAF) project. http://www.foaf-project.org/

  • The Knowledge Graph. http://www.google.com/insidesearch/features/search/knowledge.html

  • Toni F (2012) Reasoning on the web with assumption-based argumentation, Reasoning web. In: Eiter T, Krennwallner T (eds) Semantic technologies for advanced query answering, volume 7487 of Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 370–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Cuenca Grau B, Horrocks I (2012) Efficient upper bound computation of query answers in expressive description logics. In: Proceedings of description logics

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Vanina Martinez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Martinez, M.V., Gottifredi, S. (2018). Query Answering in the Semantic Social Web: An Argumentation-Based Approach. In: Alhajj, R., Rokne, J. (eds) Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7131-2_377

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics