Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adomavicius G, Tuzhilin A (2005) Toward the next generation of recommender systems: a survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 17(6):734–749
Amgoud L, Cayrol C (2002) Inferring from inconsistency in preference- based argumentation frameworks. J Auton Reason 29(2):125–169
Bench-Capon TJM, Dunne PE (2007) Argumentation in artificial intelligence. Artif Intell 171(10–15):619–641
Besnard P, Hunter A (2001) A logic-based theory of deductive arguments. Artif Intell 128(1–2):203–235
Bex F, Lawrence J, Snaith M, Reed C (2013) Implementing the argument web. Commun ACM 56(10):66–73
Bobadilla J, Ortega F, Hernando A, Gutiérrez A (2013) Recommender systems survey. Knowl-Based Syst 46:109–132
Borgatti S, Everett M (2006) A graph-theoretic perspective on centrality. Soc Networks 28(4):466–484
Breslin JG, Harth A, Bojars U, Decker S (2005) Towards semantically-interlinked online communities. In: 2nd European conference on The Semantic Web: research and Applications, ESWC. Springer, Berlin, pp 500–514
Breslin JG, Passant A, Decker S (2009) The social semantic web, 1st edn. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated, New York, USA
Briguez CE, Budán MC, Deagustini CAD, Maguitman AG, Capobianco M, Simari GR (2014) Argument-based mixed recommenders and their application to movie suggestion. Expert Syst Appl 41(14):6467–6482
Bröcheler M, Pugliese A, Subrahmanian VS (2009) Dogma: a disk-oriented graph matching algorithm for rdf databases. In: Proceedings of the international semantic web conference, pp 97–113
Bröcheler M, Shakarian P, Subrahmanian VS (2010) A scalable framework for modeling competitive diffusion in social networks. In: Proceedings of SocialCom/PASSAT, pp 295–302
Bröcheler M, Pugliese A, Subrahmanian VS (2011) A budget-based algorithm for efficient subgraph matching on huge networks. In: ICDE workshops, pp 94–99
Budán MC, Lucero MJG, Viglizzo ID, Simari GR (2015) A labeled argumentation framework. J Appl Log 13(4):534–553
Cha M, Mislove A, Gummadi KP (2009) A measurement-driven analysis of information propagation in the flickr social network. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World Wide Web, WWW. ACM, New York, pp 721–730
Chesñevar CI, McGinnis J, Modgil S, Rahwan I, Reed C, Simari GR, South M, Vreeswijk G, Willmott S (2006) Towards an argument interchange format. Knowl Eng Rev 21(4):293–316
Briguez CE, Capobianco M, Maguitman AG (2013) A theoretical framework for trust-based news recommender systems and its implementation using defeasible argumentation, Int J Artif Intell Tools 22(4)
Di Noia T, Ostuni VC (2015) Reasoning Web. Web logic rules: 11th international summer school 2015, Berlin, 31 July – 4 Aug 2015, Tutorial Lectures. Chapter Recommender Systems and Linked Open Data, pp 88–113
Dung PM (1995) On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif Intell 77(2):321–358
Fan W, Wang X, Wu Y (2014) Querying big graphs within bounded resources. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGMOD international conference on management of data, pp 301–312
Fazzinga B, Gianforme G, Gottlob G, Lukasiewicz T (2010) Semantic web search based on ontological conjunctive queries. In: Link S, Prade H (eds) Foundations of information and knowledge systems, volume 5956 of Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 153–172
Freeman LC (1977) A set of measures of centrality based on Betweenness. Sociometry 40(1):35–41
Freeman LC (1978) Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc Networks 215
Friendfeed. http://friendfeed.com/
GarcÃa AJ, Simari GR (2004) Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach. Theory Practice Logic Programming (TPLP) 4:95–138
Gottifredi S, GarcÃa AJ, Simari GR (2011) Argument types and typed argumentation frameworks. In: Theory and applications of formal argumentation. Lecture notes in computer science book series (LNCS), vol 9524. Springer International Publishing Switzerland
Harth A, Umbrich J, Hogan A, Decker S (2007) Yars2: a federated repository for querying graph structured data from the web. In: Proceedings of ISWC/ASWC, pp 211–224
Heras S, Atkinson K, Botti V, Grasso F, Julian V, McBurney P (2010) How argumentation can enhance dialogues in social networks. In: 3rd international conference on computational models of argument. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 267–274
Heras S, Atkinson K, Botti VJ, Grasso F, Julián V, McBurney P (2013) Research opportunities for argumentation in social networks. Artif Intell Rev 39(1):39–62
Jackson MO, Yariv L (2006) Diffusion on social networks. Working papers 1251. California Institute of Technology, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences. Economie Publique, No. 15 2005/1, pp. 3–16
Kang C, Molinaro C, Kraus S, Shavitt Y, Subrahmanian VS (2012) Diffusion centrality in social networks, In: International conference on advances in social networks analysis and mining
Mugnier M (2011) Ontological query answering with existential rules, In: 25th international workshop on description logics, pp 2–23
NEPOMUK social semantic desktop. http://nepomuk.semanticdesktop .org/ nepomuk/
Pak A, Paroubek P (2010) Twitter as a corpus for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on language resources and evaluation
Peis E, Morales del Castillo JM, Delgado-Lpez JA (2008) Semantic recommender systems. analysis of the state of the topic. Hipertext.net, 6, (online)
Prakken H (2005) Coherence and flexibility in dialogue games for argumentation. J Log Comput 15(6):1009–1040
Prakken H (2010) An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments. Argument Comput 1(1):93–124
Pugliese A, Bröcheler M, Subrahmanian VS, Ovelgönne M (2014) Efficient multiview maintenance under insertion in huge social networks. ACM Trans Web 8(2):1–32
Rahwan I, Simari GR (2009) Argumentation in artificial intelligence, 1st edn. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated, Switzerland
Rahwan I, Zablith F, Reed C (2007) Laying the foundations for a world wide argument web. Artif Intell 171(10–15):897–921
Rahwan I, Banihashemi B, Reed C, Walton D, Abdallah S (2011) Representing and classifying arguments on the semantic web. Knowl Eng Rev 26(4):487–511
Ronen R, Shmueli O (2009) Evaluating very large datalog queries on social networks. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on extending database technology: advances in database technology, EDBT. ACM, New York, pp 577–587
Subrahmanian VS, Reforgiato Recupero D (2008) Ava: adjective-verb- adverb combinations for sentiment analysis. IEEE Intell Syst 23(4):43–50
The Friend of a Friend (FOAF) project. http://www.foaf-project.org/
The Knowledge Graph. http://www.google.com/insidesearch/features/search/knowledge.html
Toni F (2012) Reasoning on the web with assumption-based argumentation, Reasoning web. In: Eiter T, Krennwallner T (eds) Semantic technologies for advanced query answering, volume 7487 of Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 370–386
Zhou Y, Cuenca Grau B, Horrocks I (2012) Efficient upper bound computation of query answers in expressive description logics. In: Proceedings of description logics
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Martinez, M.V., Gottifredi, S. (2018). Query Answering in the Semantic Social Web: An Argumentation-Based Approach. In: Alhajj, R., Rokne, J. (eds) Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7131-2_377
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7131-2_377
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-7130-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-7131-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceReference Module Computer Science and Engineering