Skip to main content

Qualitative Approaches to Semantic Scene Modelling and Retrieval

  • Conference paper

Abstract

This paper investigates the use of qualitative and spatially expressive semantic descriptions for image classification. In particular, it addresses the question of how a qualitative representation performs compared to a more quantitative one, using a semantic based symbolic approach. The approach is based on using different qualitative spatial representations applied to local semantic concepts such as grass, sky, water etc in a corpus of natural scenes images, to learn qualitative class descriptions and categorise them into one of six semantically meaningful classes such as coasts, forest etc. Three kinds of qualitative spatial relations, namely Allen’s relations [1] applied on the vertical axis of images, chord representation [9] applied on segmented semantically labelled image regions, and relative size of semantic concepts in each image have been investigated. A number of well-known supervised learning techniques have been applied to determine their usefulness. It is shown that a purely qualitative representation can result into better image description and perform at the similar level or even slightly better, compared to an existing largely quantitative representation [20]. Such qualitative and spatially expressive descriptions may therefore have utility in semantic querying and image retrieval systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, J. F. “Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals” In Communications of ACM, vol. 26, no. 11, November 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boutell, M., Luo, J., Shen, X., and Brown, C. “Learning multi-label scene classification”. Pattern Recognition, vol. 37, no.9, pp. 1757–1771, September 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cristianini, N. and Shaw-Taylor, J. «An introduction to support vector machines and other kernel based methods». Cambridge University Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Freund, Y., and Schapire, E. R. «Experiments with a new boosting algorithm». Proceedings of Thirteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 148–156, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gorkani, M.M., and Picard, W.R. »Texture orientation for sorting photos at a glance». In Proceedings of International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Vol.1, pp. 459–464, Jerusalem, Israel, October 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Maron, O. and Lakshmi Ratan, A. «Multiple-instance learning for natural scene classification». In Proceedings of 15th International Conference on Machine Learning, PP 341–349, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Maron, O., and Lozano-Pe’rez, T. «A framework for multiple instance learning». Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 10,1998.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mao, J., and Jain, A.K. «Texture classification and segmentation using multiresolution simultaneous autoregressive models». Pattern Recognition, Vol. 25, No. 2, Pp 173–188, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mörchen, F., Ultsch, A.: Discovering Temporal Knowledge in Multivariate Time Series, Weihs, C, Gaul, W. (Eds), In Classification; The Ubiquitous Challenge, Proceedings 28th Annual Conference of the German Classification Society (GfKl 2004), Dortmund, Germany, Springer, Heidelberg, (2005), pp. 272–279.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mukerjee, A., and Joe, G. «A Qualitative Model for Space». In Proceedings of AAAI-90, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, pp 721–727, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Oliva, A., Torralba, A., Guerin-Dugue, A., and Herault, A. «Global semantic classification of scenes using power spectrum templates». In Challenges of Image Retrieval CIR. Newcastle UK, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pal, N.R. and Pal, S.K. «A review of image segmentation techniques». Pattern Recognition, Vol. 26, Pp. 1277–1294, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Picard, R., and Minka, T. «Vision texture for annotation». ACM Journal of Multimedia Systems, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Quinlan, J.R. «C 4.5: Programs for machine learning». Morgan Kaufman Publishers, Inc. 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Szummer, M., and Picard, R. «Indoor outdoor image classification». In Workshop on Content-based Access of Image and Video Databases. Bombay, India, January 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Serrano, N., Savakis, A., and Luo, J. «Improved scene classification using efficient low level features and semantic cues». Pattern Recognition, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 1773–1784, September 2004.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Town, C, and Sinclair, D. “Content-based image retrieval using semantic visual categories”. Tech. Report 2000.14, AT&T Laboratories Cambridge, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Vailaya, A., Jain, A., and Zhang, H. «On image classification: cit vs landscape». Pattern Recognition, vol 31, no. 12, pp. 1921–1935, December 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Vailaya, A., Figueiredo, M., Jain, A., and Zhang, H.J. «Bayesian Framework for Hierarchical Semantic Classification of Vacation Images». IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems, pp. 518–523 vol.1, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vogel, J., and Schiele, B. «A semantic typicality measure for natural scene categorization». In: Pattern Recognition Symposium DAGM 2004, Tubingen, Germany, September 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vogel, J. «Semantic scene modelling and retrieval». PhD Thesis of Julia Vogel, selected Readings in Vision and Graphics, Vol. 33, Hartung-Gorre Verlag Konstanz, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Walischewski, H. «Learning regions of interest in postal automation». In roceedings of 5th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR’99), 1999, Bangalore, India.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Witten, LH., and Frank, E. «Data Mining, Practical machine learning tools and techniques with JAVA implementations». Morgan Kaufman Publishers, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Frank, E. and Witten, LH. «Generating Accurate Rule Sets Without Global Optimization.» In Shavlik, J., ed., Machine Learning: Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Qayyum, Z.U., Cohn, A.G. (2007). Qualitative Approaches to Semantic Scene Modelling and Retrieval. In: Bramer, M., Coenen, F., Tuson, A. (eds) Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XXIII. SGAI 2006. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-663-6_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-663-6_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-662-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-663-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics