We began our study of media space with the social aspects of mediated communication because many in the computer-supported cooperative work (CSCW) realm are familiar with models, theories, frameworks, issues, and design approaches related to sociality. But the first media space research came from another set of traditions — the ordering of space and the making of place. Formally, these are the professional and intellectual provinces of architecture, which are probably remote from the disciplinary backgrounds of most readers. However, remoteness in terms of rhetoric and training does not prevent proximity to everyday human experience. The meaning of media space with respect to human experience is the focus of the articles in this section. The spaces are designed to have meaning, and the meaning of the design derives from spatial experience.
The notion of “space” is half of “media space.” What does it mean to think of media space as fundamentally “a space”? What is a space anyway? The chapters in this section all proceed from the idea that space has metaphoric power and power as a metaphor. In addition, they consider a number of spatial conceits: (1) that the presence of media in physical space alters and extends the space it is in, (2) that the means of understanding experience in space is through the screen and out of the speaker, (3) that place can be constructed in mediated space as well as physical space, and (4) that the affordances of space and place are significant elements in the construction of sociality and of interpersonal communications. No single chapter tackles all these issues; in fact, none tackles any one of them as a single independent theme. Instead, they draw upon elements of these themes in a networked fashion.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Dreyfus, H. (1990). Being in the World: A Commentary on Heidegger's Being and Time. MIT Press, Cambridge.
Gaver, W., Beaver, J., and Benford, S. (2003) “Ambiguity as a resource for design,” Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, April 05–10, 2003, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA.
Gibson, J.J. (1976) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perceptual Systems. Allen & Unwin, London.
Harrison, S. and Dourish, P. (1996) “Re-Placing Space: The Roles of Place and Space in Collaborative Systems.” Proceedings of ACM CSCW 96. November 18–21, 1996, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, pp. 67–76.
Harrison, S. and Tatar, D. (2008) “Places: People, Events, Loci. The relation of semantic frames in the construction of place” Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Springer, 17(2–3): 97–135.
Sengers, P. and Gaver, B. (2006) “Staying open to interpretation: engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation”, Proceedings of the 6th ACM conference on designing interactive systems, June 26–28, 2006, University Park, PA, USA.
Simon, H. (1996). The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge.
Tuan, Y. and Hoelscher, S. (2001) Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Harrison, S. (2009). Section 2: The Space of Media Space. In: Harrison, S. (eds) Media Space 20 + Years of Mediated Life. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-483-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-483-6_11
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-482-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-483-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)