Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries

TPDL 2018: Digital Libraries for Open Knowledge pp 81–93Cite as

Maturity Models for Data and Information Management

A State of the Art

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11057))

Abstract

A Maturity Model is a widely used technique that is proved to be valuable to assess business processes or certain aspects of organizations, as it represents a path towards an increasingly organized and systematic way of doing business. A maturity assessment can be used to measure the current maturity level of a certain aspect of an organization in a meaningful way, enabling stakeholders to clearly identify strengths and improvement points, and accordingly prioritize what to do in order to reach higher maturity levels. This paper collects and analyzes the current practice on maturity models from the data and information management domains, by analyzing a collection of maturity models from literature. It also clarifies available options for practitioners and opportunities for further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.datasealofapproval.org/en/.

  2. 2.

    http://www.moreq.info/.

  3. 3.

    www.arma.org/principles.

References

  1. Nolan, R.L.: Managing the computer resource: a stage hypothesis. Commun. ACM 16, 399–405 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahern, D.M., Clouse, A., Turner, R.: CMMI Distilled: A Practical Introduction to Integrated Process Improvement, 3rd edn. Addison Wesley Professional, Boston (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. ISO/IEC 15504:2004: Information technology - Process assessment. International Organization for Standardization and International Electrotechnical Commission (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Röglinger, M., Pöppelbuß, J.: What makes a useful maturity model? A framework for general design principles for maturity models and its demonstration in business process management. In: Proceedings of the 19th European Conference on Information Systems, Helsinki, Finland, June 2011

    Google Scholar 

  5. Paulk, M., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M., Weber, C.: Capability Maturity Model for software, Version 1.1 CMU/SEI-93-TR-24. Carnegie Melon University, Pittsburgh (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Anderson, E., Jessen, S.: Project maturity in organizations. Int. J. Proj. Manag. Account. 21, 457–461 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fitterer, R., Rohner, P.: Towards assessing the networkability of health care providers: a maturity model approach. Inform. Syst. E-bus. Manag. 8, 309–333 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sen, A., Ramammurthy, K., Sinha, A.: A model of data warehousing process maturity. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 38, 336–353 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mettler, T.: A design science research perspective on maturity models in information systems. Institute of Information Management, University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. CMMI Product Team: CMMI for development - version 1.3, Software Engineering Institute - Carnegie Mellon University, Technical report CMU/SEI-2010-TR-033 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Korbel, A., Benedict, R.: Application of the project management maturity model to drive organizational improvement in a state-owned corporation. In: Proceedings of 2007 AIPM Conference, Tasmania, Australia, pp. 7–10, October 2007

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jia, G., Chen, Y., Xue, X., Chen, J., Cao, J., Tang, K.: Program management organization maturity integrated model for mega construction programs in China. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 29, 834–845 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jamaluddin, R., Chin, C., Lee, C.: Understanding the requirements for project management maturity models: awareness of the ICT industry in Malaysia. In: Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE IEEM, pp. 1573–1577 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Becker, J., Knackstedt, R., Pöppelbuβ, J.: Developing maturity models for IT management: a procedure model and its application. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 3, 213–222 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. ISO 16363:2012: Space data and information transfer systems – Audit and certification of trustworthy digital repositories (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mettler, T., Rohner, P., Winter, R.: Towards a classification of maturity models in information systems. In: D’Atri, A., De Marco, M., Braccini, A.M., Cabiddu, F. (eds.) Management of the Interconnected World, pp. 333–340. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2404-9_39

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Maier, A., Moultrie, J., Clarkson, P.: Assessing organizational capabilities: reviewing and guiding the development of maturity grids. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 59(1), 138–159 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Proenca, D., Borbinha, J.: Maturity models for information systems. In: Proceedings of the Conference on ENTERprise Information Systems 2016 (CENTERIS 2016) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  19. ISO/IEC 33000:2015: Information technology - Process assessment. International Organization for Standardization and International Electrotechnical Commission (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fayad, M., Laitnen, M.: Process assessment considered wasteful. Commun. ACM 40(11), 125–128 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Roglinger, M., Poppelbuß, J., Becker, J.: Maturity models in business process management. BPMJ 18(2), 328–346 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Object Management Group: Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN), Version 2.0, OMG Standard, formal/2011-01-03 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  23. The Open Group: ArchiMate 3.1 Specification. Van Haren Publishing (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Object Management Group: OMG Unified Modelling Language (OMG UML), Version 2.5. (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Newman, D., Logan, D.: Gartner Introduces the EIM Maturity Model. Gartner (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  26. ARMA International: Generally Accepted Recordkeeping Principles - Information Governance Maturity Model. http://www.arma.org/principles

  27. Pelz-Sharpe, A., Durga, A., Smigiel, D., Hartmen, E., Byrne, T., Gingras, J.: ECM Maturity Model - Version 2.0. Wipro - Real Story Group - Hartman (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Queensland State Archives: Recordkeeping maturity model and road map: improving recordkeeping in Queensland public authorities. The State of Queensland, Department of Public Works (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lei, T., Ligtvoet, A., Volker, L., Herder, P.: Evaluating asset management maturity in the Netherlands: a compact benchmark of eight different asset management organizations. In: Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Engineering Asset Management (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Stanford University: Data Governance Maturity Model. http://web.stanford.edu/dept/pres-provost/cgi-bin/dg/wordpress/

  31. Dollar, C.M., Ashley, L.J.: Assessing digital preservation capability using a maturity model process improvement approach. Technical report, February 2013

    Google Scholar 

  32. Brown, A.: Practical Digital Preservation: A How-to Guide for Organizations of Any Size. Facet Publishing, London (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  33. JISC InfoNet: Records Management Maturity Model. http://www.jiscinfonet.ac.uk/tools/maturity-model/

  34. CMMI Institute: Data Management Maturity (DMM) Model. Version 1.0, August 2014

    Google Scholar 

  35. Syracuse University: CMM for RDM – A Capability Maturity Model for Research Data Management. http://rdm.ischool.syr.edu/

  36. Preservica: Digital Preservation Maturity Model. White Paper (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Real Story Group, DAM Foundation: The DAM Maturity Model. http://dammaturitymodel.org/

  38. ISO 14721:2010: Space data and information transfer systems – Open archival information system – Reference model (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  39. ISO 20652:2006: Space data and information transfer systems – Producer-archive interface – Methodology abstract standard (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  40. E-ARK Project: D7.5 – A Maturity Model for Information Governance - Final Version. E-ARK Project Consortium (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  41. E-ARK Project: D7.6 – Final Assessment and Evaluation. E-ARK Project Consortium (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by national funds through Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) with reference UID/CEC/50021/2013.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal

    Diogo Proença & José Borbinha

  2. INESC-ID, Lisbon, Portugal

    Diogo Proença & José Borbinha

Authors
  1. Diogo Proença
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. José Borbinha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diogo Proença .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University Carlos III, Madrid, Spain

    Eva Méndez

  2. USI, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland

    Fabio Crestani

  3. INESC TEC, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

    Cristina Ribeiro

  4. INESC TEC, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

    Gabriel David

  5. INESC TEC, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

    João Correia Lopes

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Proença, D., Borbinha, J. (2018). Maturity Models for Data and Information Management. In: Méndez, E., Crestani, F., Ribeiro, C., David, G., Lopes, J. (eds) Digital Libraries for Open Knowledge. TPDL 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11057. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00066-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00066-0_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00065-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00066-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation