Skip to main content

Measuring Agenda Setting and Public Concern in Russian Social Media

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Internet Science (INSCI 2018)

Abstract

Intensified contradictions between Russian state and private media have the serious consequences related to the fragmentation of the agenda. Each media pursues its own purposes in agenda setting which determine their strategies regarding the audience concern. Our hypotheses were that the private media would follow the interests of their audience in agenda-setting, and the state ones, on the contrary, would ignore them. To test out hypotheses we decided to measure the media and public agenda in social media because on these platforms there was the opportunity to study both of them. This paper presents the investigation of agenda-setting on the SNS Vkontakte of four popular news groups which represent following media: Russia Today, TASS, RBC and Meduza. We compared the topic coverage of mentioned media and the engagement rate for the news. We discovered that only RT’s agenda correspond to the audience concern. In other news groups correlations were about zero. These results did not confirm our main hypotheses, but the analysis of the communication activity suggested that there was artificial activity which could affect the engagement rate. In addition, we revealed that the state media tend to cover the unobtrusive issues while the private ones – the obtrusive issues. The main methodological result of this paper is the demonstration how to replace the surveys by social media metrics in research of agenda-setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Vkontakte. Catalog, https://vk.com/catalog.php.

  2. 2.

    Alexa. Traffic Statistics, https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/vk.com.

  3. 3.

    Yandex, https://yandex.ru/yaca/cat/Media/.

  4. 4.

    Medialogy, http://www.mlg.ru/ratings/

  5. 5.

    Vkontakte. API methods, https://vk.com/dev/methods

  6. 6.

    Vkontakte. RT news in Russian, https://vk.com/rt_russian.

  7. 7.

    Vkontakte. TASS, https://vk.com/tassagency.

  8. 8.

    Vkontakte. Meduza, https://vk.com/meduzaproject.

  9. 9.

    Vkontakte. RBC, https://vk.com/rbc.

  10. 10.

    Vkontakte. RBC, https://vk.com/topic-25232578_32782346.

References

  1. Ader, C.R.: A longitudinal study of agenda setting for the issue of environmental pollution. Journal. Mass Commun. Q. 72(2), 300–311 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909507200204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aruguete, N.: The agenda setting hypothesis in the new media environment. Comunicacion y Sociedad 28, 35–58 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bennett, K.M.: Low level social engagement as a precursor of mortality among people in later life. Age Ageing 31(3), 165–168 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/31.3.165

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Brosius, H.B., Kepplinger, H.M.: The agenda-setting function of television news: static and dynamic views. Commun. Res. 17(2), 183–211 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1177/009365090017002003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chan, M., Fassbender, K.: Evaluating public engagement for a consensus development conference. J. Palliat. Med. 21, 1–20 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2017.0390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dearing, J., Rogers, E.M.: Agenda-setting research: where has it been, where is it going? Commun. Yearb. 11, 555–594 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1988.11678708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fitzgerald, R., et al.: Generating news: agenda setting in radio broadcast news. In: Burger, M. (ed.) L’analyse Linguistique des Discours Médiatiques, Nota Bene, Québec, pp. 133–154 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fletcher, R., et al.: Measuring the Reach of “Fake News” and Online Disinformation in Europe. Reuters Institute Factsheet, https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/our-research/measuring-reach-fake-news-and-online-disinformation-europe

  9. Garrison, D.R., Cleveland-Innes, M., Koole, M., Kappelman, J.: Revisiting methodological issues in transcript analysis: negotiated coding and reliability. Internet High. Educ. 9(1), 1–8 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2005.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Guo, L., Vargo, C.: The power of message networks: a big-data analysis of the network agenda setting model and issue ownership. Mass Commun. Soc. 18(5), 557–576 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2015.1045300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Guo, L.: The application of social network analysis in agenda setting research: a methodological exploration. J. Broadcast. Electron. Media 56(4), 616–631 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.732148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hanitzsch, T., Folker, H., Corinna, L.: Setting the agenda, influencing public opinion and advocating for social change: determinants of journalistic interventionism in 21 countries. Journal. Stud. 17(1), 1–20 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2014.959815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Harder, A.R., Sevenans, J., Aelst, P.: Intermedia agenda setting in the social media age: how traditional players dominate the news agenda in election times. Int. J. Press Polit. 22(2), 1–19 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161217704969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hudson, S., Huang, L., Roth, M.S., Madden, T.J.: The influence of social media interactions on consumer-brand relationships: a three-country study of brand perceptions and marketing behaviors. Int. J. Res. Mark. 33(1), 27–41 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2015.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kwansah-Aidoo, K.: The appeal of qualitative methods to traditional agenda-setting research: an example from West Africa. Gazette 63(6), 521–537 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1177/0016549201063006004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee, D., Hosanagar, K., Nair, H.: The effect of advertising content on consumer engagement: evidence from Facebook (2013). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257409065_The_Effect_of_Advertising_Content_on_Consumer_Engagement_Evidence_from_Facebook

  17. Lehmann, J., Lalmas, M., Yom-Tov, E., Dupret, G.: Models of user engagement. In: Masthoff, J., Mobasher, B., Desmarais, M.C., Nkambou, R. (eds.) UMAP 2012. LNCS, vol. 7379, pp. 164–175. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31454-4_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Lu, O.H.T., Huang, A.Y.Q., Huang J.C.H., Huang, C.S.J., Yang, S.J.H.: Early-stage engagement: applying big data analytics on collaborative learning environment for measuring learners’ engagement rate. In: International Conference on Educational Innovation through Technology. IEEE, Tainan (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/eitt.2016.28

  19. McCombs, M., Shaw, D.L.: The agenda-setting function of mass media. Publ. Opin. Q. 36, 176–187 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1086/267990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. McCombs, M.: A look at agenda-setting: past, present and future. Journal. Stud. 6(4), 543–557 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700500250438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. McCombs, M.: The agenda-setting role of the mass media in the shaping of public opinion. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237394610_The_Agenda-Setting_Role_of_the_Mass_Media_in_the_Shaping_of_Public_Opinion

  22. Mulgan, G.: Measuring social value. Stanf. Soc. Innov. Rev. 8(3), 38–43 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Neuman, R.W., Guggenheim, L., Mo Jang, S., Bae, S.Y.: The dynamics of public attention: agenda-setting theory meets big data. J. Commun. 64(2), 193–214 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Niciporuc, T.: Comparative analysis of the engagement rate on Facebook and Google Plus social networks. In: Proceedings of International Academic Conferences, pp. 334–339. International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences, Prague, London (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Noguera, J.M.: The new agenda setting paradigm in the web: cybermedia towards news social filters. Int. Assoc. Media Commun. Res. (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Paul, C., Matthews, M.: The Russian “Firehose of Falsehood” Propaganda Model. http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/perspetives/PE100/PE198/RAND_PE198.pdf

  27. Pedro, S.D.G.: Athletes engagement, resilience, and rate of perceived exertion on Portuguese national- and international-level wrestlers. Int. J. Wrestl. Sci. 6(1), 5–10 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/21615667.2016.1166299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Peñaflor, J.: Beyond “Likes” an assessment of user engagement in Facebook among Philippine Academic Libraries. Libr. Manag. 39(1/2), 59–65 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-12-2016-0100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pingree, R.J., Stoycheff, E., Sui, M., Peifer, J.T.: Setting a non-agenda: effects of a perceived lack of problems in recent news or Twitter. Mass Commun. Soc. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2018.1451543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Pinto, S., Balenzuela, P., Dorso, C.O.: Setting the agenda: different strategies of a mass media in a model of cultural dissemination. Physica A 458, 378–390 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2016.04.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Russell, F.M., Hendricks, A.M., Choi, H., Conner, S.E.: Who sets the news agenda on Twitter? Journalists’ posts during the 2013 US Government shutdown. Digit. Journal. 3(6), 925–943 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.995918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sabate, F., et al.: Factors influencing popularity of branded content in Facebook fan pages. Eur. Manag. J. 32(6), 1001–1011 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2014.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Salvo, M.T., et al.: Social media engagement: identifying the predictive anatomy of organic social content. https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/handle/2152/39080

  34. Sayre, B., Bode, L., Shah, D., Wilcox, D., Shah, C.: Agenda setting in a digital age: tracking attention to California proposition 8 in social media, online news and conventional news. Policy Internet 2(2), 7–32 (2010). https://doi.org/10.2202/1944-2866.1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Semiz, G., Berger, P.D.: Determining the factors that drive Twitter engagement-rates. Arch. Bus. Res. 5(2), 38–47 (2017). https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.52.2700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Skogerbø, E., Bruns, A., Quodling, A., Ingebretsen, T.: Agenda-setting revisited: social media and sourcing in mainstream journalism. In: Bruns, A., Enli, G., Skogerbø, E., Larsson, A.O., Christensen, C. (eds.) The Routledge Companion to Social Media and Politics, pp. 104–120. Routledge, New York (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Snegovaya, M.: Stifling the public sphere: media and civil society in Russia. National Endowment for Democracy. https://www.ned.org/stifling-the-public-sphere-media-and-civil-society-in-egypt-russia-and-vietnam/

  38. Stoycheff, E., et al.: Agenda cueing effects of news and social media. Med. Psychol. 21(2), 182–201 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2017.1311214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Theiss, S.K., et al.: Getting beyond impressions: an evaluation of engagement with breast cancer-related Facebook content. MHealth (2016). https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth.2016.10.02

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Vadivu, V.M., Neelamalar, M.: Digital brand management—a study on the factors affecting customers’ engagement in Facebook pages. In: International Conference on Smart Technologies and Management for Computing, Communication, Controls, Energy and Materials (ICSTM), pp. 71–75. IEEE, Tamil Nadu (2015) https://doi.org/10.1109/icstm.2015.7225392

  41. Wadhwa, V., Latimer, E., Chatterjee, K., McCarty, J., Fitzgerald, R.T.: Maximizing the tweet engagement rate in academia: analysis of the AJNR Twitter feed. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 38(10), 1866–1868 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Walters, P., Hoven, K.A.: Measuring audience engagement with corporate brands, through their mobile phone. Int. J. Manag. Cases (2011). https://doi.org/10.5848/apbj.2011.00006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Watanabe, K.: Measuring news bias: Russia’s Official News Agency ITAR-TASS’ coverage of the Ukraine crisis. Eur. J. Commun. 32(3), 224–241 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323117695735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Weaver, D., McCombs, M., Shaw, D.L.: Agenda-setting research: issues, attributes and influences. In: Kaid, L.L. (ed.) Handbook of political Communication Research, pp. 257–282. Erlbaum, Mahwah (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Yang, C., et al.: Research on the factors affecting users’ reposts in microblog. In: International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management, pp. 1–6. IEEE, Dalian, China (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/icsssm.2017.7996249

  46. Yang, X., Chen, B.-C., Maity, M., Ferrara, E.: Social politics: agenda setting and political communication on social media. In: Spiro, E., Ahn, Y.-Y. (eds.) SocInfo 2016. LNCS, vol. 10046, pp. 330–344. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47880-7_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Darja Judina .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Judina, D., Platonov, K. (2018). Measuring Agenda Setting and Public Concern in Russian Social Media. In: Bodrunova, S. (eds) Internet Science. INSCI 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11193. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01437-7_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01437-7_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01436-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01437-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics