Skip to main content

Emotional Stimuli in Social Media User Behavior: Emoji Reactions on a News Media Facebook Page

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Internet Science (INSCI 2018)

Abstract

Emotions influence cognitive processes such as attention to a Facebook post and lead to behavioral response, such as liking, sharing and commenting. In 2016 Facebook launched a new set of icons indicating emotions in addition to the Like button, therefore the data about emotional stimuli in social media user behavior can be gathered automatically. This study examines user response to the posts published by 18 Facebook pages of Israeli news media in Russian language and investigates relationships between selective, interpretative and productive activities of a news user.

We advocate that the usage of Emoji reactions on Facebook media pages is negatively correlated with commenting and sharing. The Love icon is used in the same way as the traditional Like. Posts evoking a Sad reaction are less likely to be commented or shared than posts arousing any other reaction.

Second, we measure the congruence between different reactions expressed in a choice of one Emoji icon. The Love icon is used in the most monosemantic way. On the contrary, the post evoking a Wow reaction might be responded with any other Emoji reaction with a moderate degree of probability. Possible meanings of the homogeneity of emotions shared in a media Facebook page community are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. McQuail, D., Blumler, J., Brown, R.: The television audience: a revised perspective. In: McQuail, D. (ed.) Sociology of Mass Communication. Longman, London (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Katz, E., Haas, H., Gurevitch, M.: On the use of the mass media for important things. Am. Sociol. Rev. 164–181 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hille, S., Bakker, P.: I like news. searching for the ‘Holy Grail’of social media: the use of Facebook by Dutch news media and their audiences. Eur. J. Commun. 28(6), 663–680 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Couldry, N., Livingstone, S., Markham, T.: Media Consumption and Public Engagement: Beyond the Presumption of Attention. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fletcher, R., Radcliffe, D.: Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2015. http://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/Supplementary%20Digital%20News%20Report%202015.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2018

  6. Picone, I.: Grasping the digital news user: conceptual and methodological advances in news use studies. Digit. J. 4(1), 125–141 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Livingstone, S.: The changing nature of audiences: from the mass audience to the interactive media user. In: Valdivia, A.N. (ed.) Companion to Media Studies, pp. 337–359. Blackwell, Oxford (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Stieglitz, S., Dang-Xuan, L.: Emotions and information diffusion in social media—sentiment of microblogs and sharing behavior. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 29(4), 217–248 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kümpel, A.S., Karnowski, V., Keyling, T.: News sharing in social media: a review of current research on news sharing users, content, and networks. Soc. Media+Soc. 1(2) (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115610141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hyvärinen, H., Beck, R.: Trump facts: the role of emotions in on social media: a literature review. In: Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 1797–1806. HICSS, Hawaii (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Larsson, A.O.: Diversifying likes. J. Pract. 12(3), 326–343 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2017.1285244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Castells, M.: The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Bailey, O.G., Georgiou, M., Harindranth, R.: Transnational Lives and the Media: Re-Imagining Diasporas. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Khvorostianov, N., Elias, N., Nimrod, G.: ‘Without it I am nothing’: the internet in the lives of older immigrants. New Media Soc. 14(4), 583–599 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Georgiou, M.: Diasporic communities online: a bottom-up experience of transnationalism. In: Sarikakis, K., Thussu, D. (eds.) The Ideology of the Internet: Concepts, Policies, Uses, pp. 131–146. Hampton Press, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Elias, N., Lemish, D.: Spinning the web of identity: the roles of the internet in the lives of immigrant adolescents. New Media Soc. 11(4), 533–551 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Everett, A.: Digital Diaspora: A Race for Cyberspace. SUNY Press, Albany (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Elias, N., Shoren-Zeltser, M.: Immigrants of the world unite? A virtual community of Russian-speaking immigrants on the web. J. Int. Commun. 12(2), 70–90 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Morgunova, O.: National living on-line? Some aspects of the Russophone e-diaspora map. E-Diasporas atlas: exploration and cartography of diasporas on digital networks. De la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme, Paris (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Korkonosenko, S.G., Berezhnaia, M.A.: Community media online: research approaches and practices of functioning. Case Ethnic Media HOLOS 5, 370–381 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Elias, N., Lemish, D.: Between three worlds: host, homeland, and global media in the lives of Russian immigrant families in Israel and Germany. J. Fam. Issues 32(9), 1245–1274 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. SimilarWeb. http://similarweb.com/. Accessed 02 June 2018

  23. Statista. https://www.statista.com. Accessed 02 June 2018

  24. Stinson, L.: Facebook reactions, the totally redesigned like button, is here. Wired, 24 February 2016. https://www.wired.com/2016/02/facebook-reactions-totally-redesignedlike-button/. Accessed 01 May 2018

  25. Morozov, E.: From slacktivism to activism. Foreign Policy, 5 September 2009. http://foreignpolicy.com/2009/09/05/from-slacktivism-to-activism/. Accessed 12 April 2018

  26. Rubin, A.M.: The uses-and-gratifications perspective of media effects. In: Bryant, J., Zillmann, D. (eds). Media Effects. Advances in Theory and Research, 2nd edn, pp. 525–548. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hall, S.: Encoding/decoding. In: Hall, S., Hobson, D., Lowe, A., Willis, P.: Culture, Media, Language, pp. 128–138. Hutchinson, London (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Livingstone, S.: The challenge of changing audiences: or, what is the audience researcher to do in the age of the internet? Eur. J. Commun. 19(1), 75–86 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Castells, M.: Communication, power and counter-power in the network society. Int. J. Commun. 1, 238–266 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bruns, A.: Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and Beyond: from Production to Produsage. Peter Lang, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rosen, J.: The People Formerly Known as the Audience. PressThink. http://archive.pressthink.org/2006/06/27/ppl_frmr.html. Accessed 03 Oct 2018

  32. Couldry, N.: The necessary future of the audience… and how to research it. In: Nightingale, V. (ed.) The Handbook of Media Audiences, pp. 213–229. Blackwell Publishing, Malden (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Reich, Z.: User comments. The transformation of participatory space. In: Singer, J.B. (ed.) Participatory Journalism: Guarding Open Gates at Online Newspapers, pp. 96–117. Wiley, Chichester (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Hille, S., Bakker, P.: Engaging the social news user: comments on news sites and Facebook. J. Pract. 8(5), 563–572 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Boczkowski, P.J., Mitchelstein, E.: How users take advantage of different forms of interactivity on online news sites: clicking, E-Mailing, and commenting. Hum. Commun. Res. 38(1), 1–22 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Chung, D.S., Yoo, C.Y.: Audience motivations for using interactive features: distinguishing use of different types of interactivity on an online newspaper. Mass Commun. Soc. 11, 375–397 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Springer, N., Engelmann, I., Pfaffinger, C.: User comments: motives and inhibitors to write and read. Inf. Commun. Soc. 18(7), 798–815 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lischka, J.A., Messerli, M.: Examining the benefits of audience integration: does sharing of or commenting on online news enhance the loyalty of online readers? Digit. J. 4(5), 597–620 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Canter, L.: The misconception of online comment threads. J. Pract. 7(5), 604–619 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2012.740172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Nagar, N.A.: The loud public: the case of user comments in online news media. Doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Albany (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hermida, A., Thurman, N.: A clash of cultures: the integration of user-generated content within professional journalistic frameworks at British newspaper websites. J. Pract. 2(3), 343–356 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Diaz Noci, J., Masip P., Domingo D., Mico, J.L., Ruiz, C.: Comments in news, democracy booster or journalistic nightmare: assessing the quality and dynamics of citizen debates in catalan online newspapers. In: #ISOJ The Official Research Journal of the International Symposium on Online Journalism, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–20 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Toepfl, F., Litvinenko, A.: Transferring control from the backend to the frontend: a comparison of the discourse architectures of comment sections on news websites across the post-Soviet world. New Media Soc. 1461444817733710 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Karlsson, M., Bergström, A., Clerwall, C., Fast, K.: Participatory journalism—the (r)evolution that wasn’t: content and user behavior in Sweden 2007–2013. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 20(3), 295–311 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Curran, J., et al.: Internet revolution revisited: a comparative study of online news. Media Cult. Soc. 35(7), 880–897 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443713499393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Larsson, A.O.: The news user on social media: a comparative study of interacting with media organizations on Facebook and Instagram. J. Stud. 1–18 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Al-Rawi, A.: News values on social media: News organizations’ Facebook use. Journalism 18(7), 871–889 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Bastos, M.T.: Shares, pins, and tweets. J. Stud. 16(3), 305–325 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2014.891857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Kalogeropoulos, A., Negredo, S., Picone, I., Nielsen, R.K. Who shares and comments on news? A cross-national comparative analysis of online and social media participation. Soc. Media+Soc. 3(4) (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117735754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Bodrunova, S.S., Smoliarova, A.S., Blekanov, I.S., Litvinenko, A.A.: Content sharing in conflictual Ad-Hoc Twitter discussions: national patterns or universal trends? In: Alexandrov, D.A., Boukhanovsky, A.V., Chugunov, A.V., Kabanov, Y., Koltsova, O. (eds.) DTGS 2017. CCIS, vol. 745, pp. 3–15. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69784-0_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  51. Singer, J.B.: User-generated visibility: secondary gatekeeping in a shared media space. New Media Soc. 16(1), 55–73 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Picone, I., De Wolf, R., Robijt, S.: Who shares what to whom and why? News sharing profiles amongst Flemish news users. Digit. J. 4, 921–932 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Christodoulides, G., Jevons, C., Bonhomme, J.: Memo to marketers: quantitative evidence for change: how user-generated content really affects brands. J. Advert. Res. 52(1), 53–64 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-52-1-053-064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Macek, J.: More than a desire for text: online participation and the social curation of content. Convergence 19(3), 295–302 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856513486530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Hermida, A., Fletcher, F., Korell, D., Logan, D.: Share, like, recommend. J. Stud. 13(5–6), 815–824 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2012.664430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Boczkowski, P.J.: News at Work: Imitation in an Age of Information Abundance. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  57. Singer, J.B., et al.: Participatory Journalism: Guarding Open Gates at Online Newspapers. Wiley, Chichester (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  58. Kalsnes, B., Larsson, A.O.: Understanding news sharing across social media: detailing distribution on Facebook and Twitter. J. Stud. 1–20 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Nielsen, R.K., Schrøder, K.C.: The relative importance of social media for accessing, finding, and engaging with news: an eight-country cross-media comparison. Digit. J. 2(4), 472–489 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Ju, A., Jeong, S.H., Chyi, H.I.: Will social media save newspapers? J. Pract. 1–17 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2013.794022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Valencia-Bermúdez, A., Lombao, T.F.: Public service media on social networks: the European case. In: Campos Freire, F., Rúas Araújo, X., Martínez Fernández, V.A., García, X.L. (eds.) Media and Metamedia Management. AISC, vol. 503, pp. 149–156. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46068-0_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  62. Braun, J., Gillespie, T.: Hosting the public discourse, hosting the public: when online news and social media converge. J. Pract. 5, 383–398 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Heiss, R., Schmuck, D., Matthes, J.: What drives interaction in political actors’ Facebook posts? Profile and content predictors of user engagement and political actors’ reactions. Inf. Commun. Soc. 1–17 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Krug, S.: Reactions now available globally. Facebook newsroom. http://newsroom.fb.com/news/2016/02/reactions-now-available-globally/. Accessed 01 May 2018

  65. Keating, L.: Facebook users shared 300 Billion reactions In: One Year. TechTimes, 24 February 2017. https://www.techtimes.com/articles/199136/20170224/facebook-users-shared-300-billion-reactions-one-year.htm. Accessed 01 May 2018

  66. Huffaker, D.: Dimensions of leadership and social influence in online communities. Hum. Commun. Res. 36(4), 593–617 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Berger, J., Milkman, K.: What makes online content viral? J. Mark. Res. 49(2), 192–205 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Papacharissi, Z.: Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  69. Joyce, E., Kraut, R.: Predicting continued participation in newsgroups. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 11(3), 723–747 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Baumeister, R.F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., Vohs, K.D.: Bad is stronger than good. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 5(4), 323–370 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Rozin, P., Royzman, E.B.: Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 5(4), 296–320 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Mancosu, M.: Populism, selective exposure, and emotional appeals in social media: a comparative approach using Facebook reactions. In: Proceedings of the SISP Conference 2016, pp. 1–35. SISP, Milano (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  73. Eberl, J.M., et al.: Emotional Reactions on Austrian parties’ Facebook pages during the 2017 Austrian Parliamentary Election. Computational Communication Science Lab, University of Vienna (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  74. Rony, M.M.U., Hassan, N., Yousuf, M.: Diving deep into Clickbaits: who use them to what extents in which topics with what effects? In: Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, pp. 232–239. ACM, New York (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  75. Pool, C., Nissim, M.: Distant supervision for emotion detection using Facebook reactions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.02988 (2016)

  76. Rieder, B.: Studying Facebook via data extraction: the Netvizz application. In: Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Web Science Conference, pp. 346–355. ACM, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research has been supported in full by Russian Presidential Grant for Young Ph.D. Scientists, research Grant MK-6128.2018.6.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna S. Smoliarova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

A Appendix

A Appendix

See Table 3.

Table 3. Descriptive statistics for the Facebook pages

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Smoliarova, A.S., Gromova, T.M., Pavlushkina, N.A. (2018). Emotional Stimuli in Social Media User Behavior: Emoji Reactions on a News Media Facebook Page. In: Bodrunova, S. (eds) Internet Science. INSCI 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11193. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01437-7_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01437-7_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01436-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01437-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics