Skip to main content

Investigation of Usability Issues Through Physiological Tools: An Experimental Study with Tourism Websites

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Human Systems Engineering and Design (IHSED 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 876))

  • 2689 Accesses

Abstract

Existing usability testing methods using verbal reports and behavioural observations estimate the time consumed in different tasks and errors occurred therein etc., they fail to provide feedback on traits like attraction and excitement felt by users which is required for tourism websites to succeed. Thus there is a need to expand the usability parameters beyond cognitive measures like ease of use and efficiency etc. and into affective measures like attraction, enjoyment, excitement, etc. This study reports use of physiological measures within usability testing setup to measure affective parameters by means of galvanic skin response, eye tracker measures and behavioural responses. In light of the findings, this paper argues use of physiological measures as an objective, low cost and practical addition to usability testing practice to enrich the usability testing findings and pave way for website designers for affective improvements into their sites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hudlicka, E.: To feel or not to feel: the role of affect in human–computer interaction. Int. J. Hum.Comput. Stud. 59(1–2), 1–32 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Conati, C.: Probabilistic assessment of user’s emotions in educational games. Appl. Artif. Intell. 16, 555–575 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Norman, D.: Emotion & design: attractive things work better. Interactions 9, 36–42 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Duchowski, A.: Eye Tracking Methodology: Theory and Practice, vol. 373. Springer, London (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Goldberg, J.H., Kotval, X.P.: Computer interface evaluation using eye movements: methods and constructs. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 24(6), 631–645 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ehmke, C., Wilson, S.: Identifying web usability problems from eye-tracking data. In: HCI 2007, pp. 119–128 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fiedler, S., Glockner, A.: The dynamics of decision making in risky choice: an eye-tracking analysis: (519682015-072). PsycEXTRA Dataset. APA (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Liversedge, S.P., Findlay, J.M.: Saccadic eye movements and cognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4(1), 6–14 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Goldberg, J.H., Stimson, M.J., Lewenstein, M., Scott, N., Wichansky, A.M.: Eye tracking in web search tasks: design implications. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications, ETRA 2002, pp. 51–58 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Phillips, M.H., Edelman, J.A.: The dependence of visual scanning performance on search direction and difficulty. Vis. Res. 48(21), 2184–2192 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Boehm-Davis, D.A., Gray, W.D., Schoelles, M.J.: The eye blink as a physiological indicator of cognitive workload. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 44, no. 33, July 2000

    Google Scholar 

  12. Siegle, G.J., Ichikawa, N., Steinhauer, S.: Blink before and after you think: blinks occur prior to and following cognitive load indexed by pupillary responses. Psychophysiology 45(5), 679–687 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jacob, R.J.K., Karn, K.S.: Eye tracking in human-computer interaction and usability research. In: The Mind’s Eye, pp. 573–605. Elsevier (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nourbakhsh, N., Wang, Y., Chen, F., Calvo, R.A.: Using galvanic skin response for cognitive load measurement in arithmetic and reading tasks. In: Proceedings of the 24th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on, OzCHI 2012, pp. 420–423 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lykken, D.T., Venables, P.H.: Direct measurement of skin conductance: a proposal for standardization. Psychophysiology 8(5), 656–672 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mehler, B., Reimer, B., Coughlin, J.F., Dusek, J.A.: Impact of incremental increases in cognitive workload on physiological arousal and performance in young adult drivers. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2138(1), 6–12 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kahneman, D.: Experienced utility and objective happiness: a moment-based approach. In: Choices, Values and Frames, pp. 673–692 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jyotish Kumar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kumar, J., Kumar, J. (2019). Investigation of Usability Issues Through Physiological Tools: An Experimental Study with Tourism Websites. In: Ahram, T., Karwowski, W., Taiar, R. (eds) Human Systems Engineering and Design. IHSED 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 876. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02053-8_56

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics