Skip to main content

Comfort Design in Human Robot Cooperative Tasks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Human Systems Engineering and Design (IHSED 2018)

Abstract

Proper design of workplaces improves task quality, engagement, and productivity of people in fulfilling their daily job. In human-robot cooperation (HRC) assignments, a human gives flexibility to the system with having the pre-developed skills. Moreover, using robots brings the possibility to support human for boring, repetitive, and heavy tasks. In this work, we introduce and experiment a set of factors used to design an HRC environment and modify these factors to provide optimized comfort for diverse people working beside an industrial robot. The factors are divided into two groups (1) general, which is same for all users; (2) user-specific, which defers for various human. The paper aims to analyze the human physical and mental performance and comfort change in two experiments. During the case study, robot assists human to perform part of a truck engine assembly job.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Krüger, J., Lien, T.K., Verl, A.: Cooperation of human and machines in assembly lines. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 58, 628–646 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Robla-Gomez, S., Becerra, V.M., Llata, J.R., Gonzalez-Sarabia, E., Torre-Ferrero, C., Perez-Oria, J.: Working together: a review on safe human-robot collaboration in industrial environments. IEEE Access 5, 26754–26773 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Caputo, F., Di Gironimo, G., Marzano, A.: Ergonomic optimization of a manufacturing system work cell in a virtual environment. Acta Polytech. 46, 21–27 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wykowska, A., Chaminade, T., Cheng, G.: Embodied artificial agents for understanding human social cognition. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 371, 20150375 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Macfarlane, G.J., Thomas, E., Papageorgiou, A.C., Croft, P.R., Jayson, M.I.V., Silman, A.J.: Employment and physical work activities as predictors of future low back pain. Spine (Phila. Pa. 1976) 22, 1143–1149 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zander, J.E., King, P.M., Ezenwa, B.N.: Influence of flooring conditions on lower leg volume following prolonged standing. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 34, 279–288 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tissot, F., Messing, K., Stock, S.: Studying the relationship between low back pain and working postures among those who stand and those who sit most of the working day. Ergonomics 52, 1402–1418 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Changizi, A., Lanz, M.: The comfort zone concept in a human-robot cooperative task. In: Ratchev, S.M. (ed.) Proceedings of the Precision Assembly Technologies and Systems, Chamonix, France (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L.: Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am. Psychol. 55, 68 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sheldon, K.M., Elliot, A.J., Kim, Y., Kasser, T.: What is satisfying about satisfying events? Testing 10 candidate psychological needs. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 80, 325 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Motmans, R.: DINBelg 2005 - anthropometry table. http://dinbelg.be/anthropometry.htm

  12. Molenbroek, J.: DINED- Anthropometry in design. https://dined.io.tudelft.nl/en

  13. Sanders, M.S., McCormick, E.J.: Human Factors in Engineering and Design. McGraw-Hill, New York (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Smith, M.W., Sharit, J., Czaja, S.J.: Aging, motor control, and the performance of computer mouse tasks. Hum. Factors 41, 389–396 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li, K.Z.H., Lindenberger, U., Freund, A.M., Baltes, P.B.: Walking while memorizing: age-related differences in compensatory behavior. Psychol. Sci. 12, 230–237 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mattsson, S., Fast-Berglund, Å., Åkerman, M.: Assessing operator wellbeing through physiological measurements in real-time—towards industrial application. Technologies 5, 61 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li, D., Landström, A., Mattsson, S., Karlsson, M.: How changes in cognitive automation can affect operator performance and productivity. In: The Sixth Swedish Production Symposium (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mather, M., Carstensen, L.L.: Aging and motivated cognition: the positivity effect in attention and memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9, 496–502 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Grolnick, W.S., Ryan, R.M.: Autonomy in children’s learning: an experimental and individual difference investigation. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 52, 890 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Groves, R.M., Fowler Jr., F.J., Couper, M.P., Lepkowski, J.M., Singer, E., Tourangeau, R.: Survey Methodology. John Wiley & Sons, New York (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Harvey, C., Stanton, N.A.D., Young, M.S.: Guide to Methodology in Ergonomics: Designing for Human Use. CRC Press, London (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fozard, J.L., Gordon-Salant, S.: Sensory and perceptual changes with aging. In: Handbook of the Psychology of Aging, vol. 5 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors would like to thank Jane and Aatos Erkko Foundation and Technology Industries of Finland Centennial Foundation for the support of UNITY (2016-2019) project and the Academy of Finland for the project ‘Competitive funding to strengthen university research profiles’, decision number 310325.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alireza Changizi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Changizi, A., Dianatfar, M., Lanz, M. (2019). Comfort Design in Human Robot Cooperative Tasks. In: Ahram, T., Karwowski, W., Taiar, R. (eds) Human Systems Engineering and Design. IHSED 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 876. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02053-8_79

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics