Skip to main content

Computing Exposition Coherence Across Learning Resources

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems. OTM 2018 Conferences (OTM 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 11230))

Abstract

With increasing numbers of open learning resources on the web that are created and published independently by different sources, stringing together coherent learning pathways is a challenging task. Coherence in this context means the semantic “smoothness” of transition from one learning resource to the next, i.e., the change in topic distribution and exposition styles between consecutive resources is minimal, and the overall sequence of resources together provides a good learning experience. Towards this end, we present a model to compute exposition coherence between a pair of learning resources, based on representing exposition styles in the form of a random walk. It is based on an underlying hypothesis about exposition styles modelled as a sequence of topical entailments. Evaluation of the presented model on the dataset of learning pathways curated by the teachers of the educational platform Gooru.org, show promising results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://deeplearning4j.org.

  2. 2.

    https://gooru.org.

References

  1. Agrawal, R., Chakraborty, S., Gollapudi, S., Kannan, A., Kenthapadi, K.: Empowering authors to diagnose comprehension burden in textbooks. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD International Cconference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 967–975. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arnett, T.: Connecting ed & tech: partnering to drive student outcomes. Clayton Christensen Institute for Disruptive Innovation (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brusilovsky, P., Henze, N.: Open corpus adaptive educational hypermedia. In: Brusilovsky, P., Kobsa, A., Nejdl, W. (eds.) The Adaptive Web. LNCS, vol. 4321, pp. 671–696. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72079-9_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Changuel, S., Labroche, N., Bouchon-Meunier, B.: Resources sequencing using automatic prerequisite-outcome annotation. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. (TIST) 6(1), 6 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, C.M.: Intelligent web-based learning system with personalized learning path guidance. Comput. Educ. 51(2), 787–814 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hsieh, T.C., Wang, T.I.: A mining-based approach on discovering courses pattern for constructing suitable learning path. Expert Syst. Appl. 37(6), 4156–4167 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang, L., Milne, D., Frank, E., Witten, I.H.: Learning a concept-based document similarity measure. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 63(8), 1593–1608 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hummel, H.G., et al.: Combining social-based and information-based approaches for personalised recommendation on sequencing learning activities. Int. J. Learn. Technol. 3(2), 152–168 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Islam, A., Inkpen, D.: Semantic text similarity using corpus-based word similarity and string similarity. ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data (TKDD) 2(2), 10 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Knauf, R., Sakurai, Y., Takada, K., Tsuruta, S.: Personalizing learning processes by data mining. In: 2010 IEEE 10th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), pp. 488–492. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kondor, R.I., Lafferty, J.: Diffusion kernels on graphs and other discrete input spaces. ICML 2, 315–322 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kongkachandra, R., Chamnongthai, K.: Using linguistics information for improving the sentence-based semantic relatedness measurement. In: International Symposium on Communications and Information Technologies ISCIT 2007, pp. 1372–1376. IEEE (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Krieger, K., Schneider, J., Nywelt, C., Rösner, D.: Creating semantic fingerprints for web documents. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics, p. 11. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Labutov, I., Lipson, H.: Web as a textbook: curating targeted learning paths through the heterogeneous learning resources on the web. In: EDM, pp. 110–118 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Le, Q., Mikolov, T.: Distributed representations of sentences and documents. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 1188–1196 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Liu, B., Zhang, T., Niu, D., Lin, J., Lai, K., Xu, Y.: Matching long text documents via graph convolutional networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.07459 (2018)

  17. Mann, W.C., Thompson, S.A.: Rhetorical structure theory: toward a functional theory of text organization. Text-Interdiscip. J. Stud. Discourse 8(3), 243–281 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Manrique, R.: Towards automatic learning content sequence via linked open data. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Intelligence, pp. 1230–1233. ACM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G.S., Dean, J.: Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 3111–3119 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mueller, J., Thyagarajan, A.: Siamese recurrent architectures for learning sentence similarity. In: AAAI, pp. 2786–2792 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ni, Y., et al.: Semantic documents relatedness using concept graph representation. In: Proceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 635–644. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Paas, F., Renkl, A., Sweller, J.: Cognitive load theory and instructional design: recent developments. Educ. Psychol. 38(1), 1–4 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Paul, C., Rettinger, A., Mogadala, A., Knoblock, C.A., Szekely, P.: Efficient graph-based document similarity. In: Sack, H., Blomqvist, E., d’Aquin, M., Ghidini, C., Ponzetto, S.P., Lange, C. (eds.) ESWC 2016. LNCS, vol. 9678, pp. 334–349. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34129-3_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Pelánek, R.: Measuring similarity of educational items using data on learners’ performance (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ponza, M., Ferragina, P., Chakrabarti, S.: A two-stage framework for computing entity relatedness in wikipedia. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 1867–1876. ACM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rachakonda, A.R., Srinivasa, S., Kulkarni, S., Srinivasan, M.: A generic framework and methodology for extracting semantics from co-occurrences. Data Knowl. Eng. 92, 39–59 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shen, L., Shen, R.: Learning content recommendation service based-on simple sequencing specification. In: Liu, W., Shi, Y., Li, Q. (eds.) ICWL 2004. LNCS, vol. 3143, pp. 363–370. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27859-7_47

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Siehndel, P., Kawase, R., Nunes, B.P., Herder, E.: Towards automatic building of learning pathways. In: WEBIST, no. 2, pp. 270–277 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Vishwanathan, S.V.N., Schraudolph, N.N., Kondor, R., Borgwardt, K.M.: Graph kernels. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 11(Apr), 1201–1242 (2010)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Wong, L.H., Looi, C.K.: Adaptable learning pathway generation with ant colony optimization. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 12(3), 309 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Yeh, E., Ramage, D., Manning, C.D., Agirre, E., Soroa, A.: WikiWalk: random walks on wikipedia for semantic relatedness. In: Proceedings of the 2009 Workshop on Graph-Based Methods for Natural Language Processing, pp. 41–49. Association for Computational Linguistics (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Yu, Z., Nakamura, Y., Jang, S., Kajita, S., Mase, K.: Ontology-based semantic recommendation for context-aware e-learning. In: Indulska, J., Ma, J., Yang, L.T., Ungerer, T., Cao, J. (eds.) UIC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4611, pp. 898–907. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73549-6_88

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Yueh-Min, H., Tien-Chi, H., Wang, K.T., Hwang, W.Y.: A markov-based recommendation model for exploring the transfer of learning on the web. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 12(2), 144 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge and thank the contributions of the project associates P. Srinivasan, Karan Kumar Gupta, and Sanket Kutumbe.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chaitali Diwan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Diwan, C., Srinivasa, S., Ram, P. (2018). Computing Exposition Coherence Across Learning Resources. In: Panetto, H., Debruyne, C., Proper, H., Ardagna, C., Roman, D., Meersman, R. (eds) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems. OTM 2018 Conferences. OTM 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11230. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02671-4_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02671-4_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02670-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02671-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics