Skip to main content

Improving Session Search Performance with a Multi-MDP Model

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11292))

Abstract

To fulfill some sophisticated information needs in Web search, users may submit multiple queries in a search session. Session search aims to provide an optimized document rank by utilizing query log as well as user interaction behaviors within a search session. Although a number of solutions were proposed to solve the session search problem, most of these efforts simply assume that users’ search intents stay unchanged during the search process. However, most complicated search tasks involve exploratory processes where users’ intents evolve while interacting with search results. The evolving process leaves the static search intent assumption unreasonable and hurts the performance of document rank. To shed light on this research question, we propose a system with multiple agents which adjusts its framework by a self-adaption mechanism. In the framework, each agent models the document ranking as a Markov Decision Process (MDP) and updates its parameters by Reinforcement Learning algorithms. Experimental results on TREC Session Track datasets (2013 & 2014) show the effectiveness of the proposed framework.

J. Chen—This work is supported by Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61622208, 61732008, 61532011) and National Key Basic Research Program (2015CB358700).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://trec.nist.gov.

  2. 2.

    http://lemurproject.org/clueweb12/.

References

  1. Carterette, B., Kanoulas, E., Hall, M., Bah, A., Clough, P.: Overview of the TREC 2013 session track. Technical report, Delaware University Newark Department of Computer and Information Sciences (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carterette, B., Kanoulas, E., Hall, M., Clough, P.: Overview of the TREC 2014 session track. Technical report, Delaware University Newark Department of Computer and Information Sciences (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carterette, B., Kanoulas, E., Yilmaz, E.: Simulating simple user behavior for system effectiveness evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 611–620. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Feild, H., Allan, J.: Task-aware query recommendation. In: Proceedings of the 36th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 83–92. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Guan, D., Yang, H., Goharian, N.: Effective structured query formulation for session search. Technical report, Georgetown Univ Washington DC Dept Of Computer Science (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Guan, D., Zhang, S., Yang, H.: Utilizing query change for session search. In: Proceedings of the 36th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 453–462. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gwizdka, J., Hansen, P., Hauff, C., He, J., Kando, N.: Search as learning (SAL) workshop 2016. In: Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 1249–1250. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jiang, J., Han, S., Wu, J., He, D.: Pitt at TREC 2011 session track. In: TREC (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Joachims, T.: A probabilistic analysis of the Rocchio algorithm with TFIDF for text categorization. Technical report, Carnegie-Mellon University Pittsburgh PA Department of Computer Science (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kotov, A., Bennett, P.N., White, R.W., Dumais, S.T., Teevan, J.: Modeling and analysis of cross-session search tasks. In: Proceedings of the 34th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in Information Retrieval, pp. 5–14. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Littman, M.L., Kaelbling, L.P., Cassandra, A.R.: Planning and acting in partially observable stochastic domains. Artif. Intell. 99–134 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Liu, J., Belkin, N.J.: Personalizing information retrieval for multi-session tasks: the roles of task stage and task type. In: Proceedings of the 33rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 26–33. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Luo, J., Zhang, S., Yang, H.: Win-win search: dual-agent stochastic game in session search. In: Proceedings of the 37th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 587–596. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pennington, J., Socher, R., Manning, C.: GloVe: global vectors for word representation. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 1532–1543 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pitman, J., et al.: Combinatorial stochastic processes. Technical report, Technical Report 621, Department of Statistics, UC Berkeley, 2002. Lecture notes for St. Flour course (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Radlinski, F., Joachims, T.: Query chains: learning to rank from implicit feedback, pp. 239–248 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Raman, K., Bennett, P.N., Collins-Thompson, K.: Toward whole-session relevance: exploring intrinsic diversity in web search. In: Proceedings of the 36th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 463–472. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Song, Y., He, L.W.: Optimal rare query suggestion with implicit user feedback. In: International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2010, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA, pp. 901–910, April 2010

    Google Scholar 

  19. Teevan, J., Dumais, S.T., Liebling, D.J.: To personalize or not to personalize: modeling queries with variation in user intent. In: International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 163–170 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wang, H., Song, Y., Chang, M.W., He, X., White, R.W., Chu, W.: Learning to extract cross-session search tasks. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 1353–1364. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wei, Z., Xu, J., Lan, Y., Guo, J., Cheng, X.: Reinforcement learning to rank with markov decision process (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang, S., Luo, J., Yang, H.: A POMDP model for content-free document re-ranking, pp. 1139–1142 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jia Chen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chen, J., Liu, Y., Luo, C., Mao, J., Zhang, M., Ma, S. (2018). Improving Session Search Performance with a Multi-MDP Model. In: Tseng, YH., et al. Information Retrieval Technology. AIRS 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11292. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03520-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03520-4_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03519-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03520-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics