Skip to main content

A Distributed Probabilistic Model for Fault Diagnosis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1290 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11238))

Abstract

Fault diagnosis in complex systems is important due to the impact it may have for reducing breakage costs or for avoiding production losses in industrial systems. Several approaches have been proposed for fault diagnosis, some of which are based on Bayesian Networks. Bayesian Networks are an adequate formalism for representing and reasoning under uncertainty conditions, however, they do not scale well for complex systems. For overcoming this limitation, researchers have proposed Multiply Sectioned Bayesian Networks. These are an extension of the Bayesian Networks for representing large domains, while ensuring the network inference in an efficient way. In this work we propose a distributed method for fault diagnosis in complex systems using Multiply Sectioned Bayesian Networks. The method was tested in the detection of multiple faults in combinational logic circuits showing comparable results with the literature in terms of accuracy, but with a significant reduction in the runtime.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bar-Yam, Y.: Dynamics of Complex Systems, vol. 213. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bertrand-Krajewski, J.L., Winkler, S., Saracevic, E., Torres, A., Schaar, H.: Comparison of and uncertainties in raw sewage cod measurements by laboratory techniques and field UV-visible spectrometry. Water Sci. Technol. 56(11), 17–25 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Böhme, T., Cox, C., Valentin, N., Denoeux, T.: Comparison of autoassociative neural networks and kohonen maps for signal failure detection and reconstruction. Intell. Eng. Syst. Through Artif. Neural Netw. 9, 637–644 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Branisavljević, N., Kapelan, Z., Prodanović, D.: Improved real-time data anomaly detection using context classification. J. Hydroinformatics 13(3), 307–323 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chowdhury, G.G.: Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval. Facet Publishing, London (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cooper, G.F.: The computational complexity of probabilistic inference using Bayesian belief networks. Artif. Intell. 42(2–3), 393–405 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Eryurek, E., Upadhyaya, B.: Sensor validation for power plants using adaptive backpropagation neural network. IEEE Trans. Nuclear Sci. 37(2), 1040–1047 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Goebel, K., Agogino, A.: An architecture for fuzzy sensor validation and fusion for vehicle following in automated highways. In: Proceedings of the 29th International Symposium on Automotive Technology and Automation (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Guo, T.H., Nurre, J.: Sensor failure detection and recovery by neural networks. In: Seattle International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, IJCNN 1991, vol. 1, pp. 221–226. IEEE (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Haykin, S.S., et al.: Kalman Filtering and Neural Networks. Wiley, Hoboken (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Holbert, K.E., Heger, A.S., Alang-Rashid, N.K.: Redundant sensor validation by using fuzzy logic. Nuclear Sci. Eng. 118(1), 54–64 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ibargüengoytia, P.H., Vadera, S., Sucar, L.E.: A probabilistic model for information and sensor validation. Comput. J. 49(1), 113–126 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ibarguengoytia, P., et al.: Any time probabilistic sensor validation. Ph.D. thesis, University of Salford, UK (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Khadem, M., Alexandro, F., Colley, R.: Sensor validation in power plants using neural networks. In: Neural Network Computing for the Electric Power Industry, pp. 51–54 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lauritzen, S.L., Spiegelhalter, D.J.: Local computations with probabilities on graphical structures and their application to expert systems. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodol.) 50, 157–224 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Napolitano, M.R., Windon, D.A., Casanova, J.L., Innocenti, M., Silvestri, G.: Kalman filters and neural-network schemes for sensor validation in flight control systems. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 6(5), 596–611 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rajakarunakaran, S., Venkumar, P., Devaraj, D., Rao, K.S.P.: Artificial neural network approach for fault detection in rotary system. Appl. Soft Comput. 8(1), 740–748 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Samanta, B.: Gear fault detection using artificial neural networks and support vector machines with genetic algorithms. Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 18(3), 625–644 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sucar, L.E.: Probabilistic Graphical Models - Principles and Applications. Advances in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6699-3

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Sun, S., et al.: Literature review for data validation methods. Sci. Technol. 47(2), 95–102 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tipping, M.E.: Sparse Bayesian learning and the relevance vector machine. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 1(Jun), 211–244 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Valentin, N., et al.: A neural network-based software sensor for coagulation control in a water treatment plant. Intell. Data Anal. 5(1), 23–39 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Xiang, Y.: Webweavr-iv research toolkit (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Xiang, Y.: Comparison of multiagent inference methods in multiply sectioned Bayesian networks. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 33(3), 235–254 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Xiang, Y., Jensen, F.V., Chen, X.: Inference in multiply sectioned Bayesian networks: methods and performance comparison. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B (Cybern.) 36(3), 546–558 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Xiang, Y., Poole, D., Beddoes, M.P.: Multiply sectioned Bayesian networks and junction forests for large knowledge-based systems. Comput. Intell. 9(2), 171–220 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was sponsored by CEMIE-Eolico (CONACYT and SENER) and INAOE. The first author gratefully acknowledges CONACyT for her master scholarship 611489.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Li Oña García .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Oña García, A.L., Sucar, L.E., Morales, E.F. (2018). A Distributed Probabilistic Model for Fault Diagnosis. In: Simari, G., Fermé, E., Gutiérrez Segura, F., Rodríguez Melquiades, J. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence - IBERAMIA 2018. IBERAMIA 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11238. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03928-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03928-8_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03927-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03928-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics