Skip to main content

The Firm Performance – Overinvestment Relationship Under the Government’s Regulation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1215 Accesses

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 809))

Abstract

With the purpose of identifying the negative association between overinvestment caused by agency problems and firm performance measured through profitability, the research employs the dataset of Thomson Reuters covering 669 Vietnamese non-financial listed companies in the period of 2012–2016. Applying the fixed effect technique to measure overinvestment and run the main econometric model, the paper finds that overinvestment is the cause leading to ineffective operations because it decreases firm profitability. The negative association between firm performance and overinvestment can be regulated with the intervention of the government through state ownership. The regulation impact of state ownership will be stronger in companies that has state ownership rate lower than 50%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Appendix for the description of all variables.

References

  • Adhikari, A., Derashid, C., Zhang, H.: Public policy, political connections, and effective tax rates: Longitudinal evidence from Malaysia. J. Account. Public Policy 25(5), 574–595 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altaf, N., Shah, F.: Working capital management, firm performance and financial constraints: empirical evidence from India. Asia Pac. J. Bus. Adm. 9(3), 206–219 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bokpin, G.A., Onumah, J.M.: An empirical analysis of the determinants of corporate investment decisions: evidence from emerging market firms. Int. Res. J. Financ. Econ. 33, 134–141 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos, D.: Privatization: a theoretical treatment. OUP Catalogue (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Boubakri, N., Cosset, J.-C., Saffar, W.: Political connections of newly privatized firms. J. Corp. Financ. 14(5), 654–673 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boubakri, N., Cosset, J.C.: The financial and operating performance of newly privatized firms: evidence from developing countries. J. Financ. 53(3), 1081–1110 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boycko, M., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R.W.: A theory of privatisation. Econ. J., 309–319 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brealey, R., Franks, J.: Indexation, investment, and utility prices. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 25(3), 435–450 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, R.E., Guariglia, A.: Cash flow, investment, and investment opportunities: new tests using UK panel data. J. Bank. Financ. 32(9), 1894–1906 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.-C., Hung, M., Wang, Y.: The effect of mandatory CSR disclosure on firm profitability and social externalities: evidence from China. J. Account. Econ. (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Claessens, S., Feijen, E., Laeven, L.: Political connections and preferential access to finance: the role of campaign contributions. J. Financ. Econ. 88(3), 554–580 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, J.T.: Investment policy at family firms: evidence from Thailand. J. Econ. Bus. 83, 91–122 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’souza, J., Megginson, W.L.: The financial and operating performance of privatized firms during the 1990s. J. Financ. 54(4), 1397–1438 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denis, D.K., McConnell, J.J.: International corporate governance. J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 38(1), 1–36 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewenter, K.L., Malatesta, P.H.: State-owned and privately owned firms: an empirical analysis of profitability, leverage, and labor intensity. Am. Econ. Rev. 91(1), 320–334 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djankov, S., Murrell, P.: Enterprise restructuring in transition: a quantitative survey. J. Econ. Lit. 40(3), 739–792 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faccio, M.: Politically connected firms. Am. Econ. Rev. 96(1), 369–386 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, J.P., Wong, T.J., Zhang, T.: Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance, and Post-IPO performance of China’s newly partially privatized firms. J. Financ. Econ. 84(2), 330–357 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farooq, S., Ahmed, S., Saleem, K.: Impact of Overinvestment & Underinvestment on Corporate Performance: Evidence from Singapore Stock Market (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fosu, S.: Capital structure, product market competition and firm performance: evidence from South Africa. Q. Rev. Econ. Financ. 53(2), 140–151 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaver, J.J., Gaver, K.M.: Additional evidence on the association between the investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend, and compensation policies. J. Account. Econ. 16(1–3), 125–160 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grazzi, M., Jacoby, N., Treibich, T.: Dynamics of investment and firm performance: comparative evidence from manufacturing industries. Empir. Econ. 51(1), 125–179 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guariglia, A., Yang, J.: A balancing act: managing financial constraints and agency costs to minimize investment inefficiency in the Chinese market. J. Corp. Financ. 36, 111–130 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guedhami, O., Pittman, J.A., Saffar, W.: Auditor choice in privatized firms: empirical evidence on the role of state and foreign owners. J. Account. Econ. 48(2–3), 151–171 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, W., Kyaw, N.A.: Ownership structure and investment decisions of Chinese SOEs. Res. Int. Bus. Financ. 43, 48–57 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellman, J.S., Jones, G., Kaufmann, D.: Seize the state, seize the day: State capture, corruption and influence in transition (2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hodrick, R.J., Prescott, E.C.: Postwar US business cycles: an empirical investigation. J. Money Credit. Bank. 1–16 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M.C.: Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. Am. Econ. Rev. 76(2), 323–329 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M.C., Meckling, W.H.: Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J. Financ. Econ. 3(4), 305–360 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S., Mitton, T.: Cronyism and capital controls: evidence from Malaysia. J. Financ. Econ. 67(2), 351–382 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, A.O.: The political economy of controls: American sugar: National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge, Mass., USA (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R.: Investor protection and corporate governance. J. Financ. Econ. 58(1), 3–27 (2000a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R.W.: Agency problems and dividend policies around the world. J. Financ. 55(1), 1–33 (2000b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, D., Zhang, L.: Does Q-theory with investment frictions explain anomalies in the cross section of returns? J. Financ. Econ. 98(2), 297–314 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Licandro, O., Maroto, R., Puch, L.A.: Innovation, investment and productivity: evidence from Spanish firms (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, N., Bredin, D.: Institutional Investors, Over-investment and Corporate Performance. University College Dublin (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, X.: Booty socialism, bureau-preneurs, and the state in transition: Organizational corruption in China. Comp. Polit., 273–294 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malm, J., Adhikari, H.P., Krolikowski, M., Sah, N.: Litigation risk and investment policy. J. Econ. Financ., 1–12 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Megginson, W.L., Netter, J.M.: From state to market: a survey of empirical studies on privatization. J. Econ. Lit. 39(2), 321–389 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nair, P.: Financial liberalization and determinants of investment: a study of indian manufacturing firms. Int. J. Manag. Int. Bus. Econ. Syst. 5(1), 121–133 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsen, Ø.A., Raknerud, A., Rybalka, M., Skjerpen, T.: Lumpy investments, factor adjustments, and labour productivity. Oxf. Econ. Pap. 61(1), 104–127 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M.W., Buck, T., Filatotchev, I.: Do outside directors and new managers help improve firm performance? An exploratory study in Russian privatization. J. World Bus. 38(4), 348–360 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, S.: Over-investment of free cash flow. Rev. Account. Stud. 11(2–3), 159–189 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez, G.C., Espejo, C.A.D., Cabrera, R.V.: Incentives management during privatization: an agency perspective. J. Manag. Stud. 44(4), 536–560 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Porras, A., Lopez-Mateo, C.: Corporate governance, market competition and investment decisions in Mexican manufacturing firms (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheshinski, E., López-Calva, L.F.: Privatization and its benefits: theory and evidence. CESifo Econ. Stud. 49(3), 429–459 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A., Vishny, R.W.: Politicians and firms. Q. J. Econ. 109(4), 995–1025 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Q., Tong, W.H., Tong, J.: How does government ownership affect firm performance? Evidence from China’s privatization experience. J. Bus. Financ. Account. 29(1–2), 1–27 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Titman, S., Wei, K.J., Xie, F.: Capital investments and stock returns. J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 39(4), 677–700 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, W.: Corporate investment and value creation. Indiana University Bloomington (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tran Le Khang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendixes

Appendixes

Table A1. Variable Measurement for main econometric model
Table A2. Variable measurement for subequation

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Van Thuong, C., Thanh, N.C., Le Khang, T. (2019). The Firm Performance – Overinvestment Relationship Under the Government’s Regulation. In: Kreinovich, V., Thach, N., Trung, N., Van Thanh, D. (eds) Beyond Traditional Probabilistic Methods in Economics. ECONVN 2019. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 809. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04200-4_84

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics