Skip to main content

Experimental Validation of Minimum-Jerk Principle in Physical Human-Robot Interaction

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Neural Information Processing (ICONIP 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 11307))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Human motor control is a complex process, and undergoes changes due to the environmental interactions in physical human-robot interaction (pHRI). This pilot study aims to explore whether human motion under robotic constraints still complies with the same principles as in unconstrained situations, and how humans adapt to non-biological patterns of robot movements. Two typical modes in applications of pHRI (e.g., robot-assisted rehabilitation) are tested in this study. In human-dominant mode, by building spring-damper force fields using a planar rehabilitation robot, we demonstrated that participants’ actual motion in reaching movements complied well with the standard minimum-jerk trajectory. However, when the virtual impedance between human force and virtual display was different from the human-robot physical impedance, the actual motion was also in a straight line but had a skewed bell-shaped velocity profile. In robot-dominant mode, by instructing participants to move along with the robot following biological or non-biological velocity patterns, we illustrated that humans were better adapted to biological velocity patterns. In conclusion, minimum-jerk trajectory is a human preferred pattern in motor control, no matter under robotic force or motion constraints. Meanwhile, both visual feedback and haptic feedback are critical in human-robot cooperation and have effects on actual human motor control. The results of our experiments provide the background for modeling of human motion, prediction of human motion and trajectory planning in robot-assisted rehabilitation.

This work was supported in part by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant #61603386, U1613228, 61720106012, 61533016, 61421004) and Beijing Natural Science Foundation (Grant L172050).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Flash, T., Hogan, N.: The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model. J. Neurosci. 5(7), 1688–1703 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wada, Y., Kaneko, Y., Nakano, E., Osu, R., Kawato, M.: Quantitative examinations for multi joint arm trajectory planning–using a robust calculation algorithm of the minimum commanded torque change trajectory. Neural Netw. 14(4–5), 381–393 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Uno, Y., Kawato, M., Suzuki, R.: Formation and control of optimal trajectory in human multijoint arm movement. Biol. Cybern. 61(2), 89–101 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Harris, C.M., Wolpert, D.M.: Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning. Nature 394(6695), 780 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Soechting, J.F., Buneo, C.A., Herrmann, U., Flanders, M.: Moving effortlessly in three dimensions: does donders’ law apply to arm movement? J. Neurosci. 15(9), 6271–6280 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Scott, S.H.: Optimal feedback control and the neural basis of volitional motor control. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 5(7), 532 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Maeda, Y., Hara, T., Arai, T.: Human-robot cooperative manipulation with motion estimation. In: Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), vol. 4, pp. 2240–2245 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Corteville, B., Aertbeliën, E., Bruyninckx, H., De Schutter, J., Van Brussel, H.: Human-inspired robot assistant for fast point-to-point movements. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 3639–3644 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pehlivan, A.U., Sergi, F., O’Malley, M.K.: A subject-adaptive controller for wrist robotic rehabilitation. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 20(3), 1338–1350 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Reed, K.B., Peshkin, M.A.: Physical collaboration of human-human and human-robot teams. IEEE Trans. Haptics 1(2), 108–120 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Robertson, J.V.G., Roby-Brami, A.: Augmented feedback, virtual reality and robotics for designing new rehabilitation methods. In: Didier, J.-P., Bigand, E. (eds.) Rethinking physical and rehabilitation medicine. Collection de L’Académie Européenne de Médecine de Réadaptation, pp. 223–245. Springer, Paris (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0034-9_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Matsuoka, Y., Brewer, B.R., Klatzky, R.L.: Using visual feedback distortion to alter coordinated pinching patterns for robotic rehabilitation. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 4(1), 17 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Peng, L., Hou, Z.-G., Kasabov, N., Peng, L., Hu, J., Wang, W.: Implementation of active training for an upper-limb rehabilitation robot based on impedance control. In: Proceedings of 27th Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC), pp. 5453–5458 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hogan, N.: An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements. J. Neurosci. 4(11), 2745–2754 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Peng, L., Hou, Z.-G., Peng, L., Wang, W.: Design of CASIA-ARM: a novel rehabilitation robot for upper limbs. In: Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 5611–5616 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Peng, L., Hou, Z.-G., Peng, L., Luo, L., Wang, W.: Robot assisted rehabilitation of the arm after stroke: prototype design and clinical evaluation. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 60(7), 073201 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Maurice, P., Huber, M.E., Hogan, N., Sternad, D.: Velocity-curvature patterns limit human-robot physical interaction. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 3(1), 249–256 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zeng-Guang Hou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wang, C., Peng, L., Hou, ZG., Luo, L., Chen, S., Wang, W. (2018). Experimental Validation of Minimum-Jerk Principle in Physical Human-Robot Interaction. In: Cheng, L., Leung, A., Ozawa, S. (eds) Neural Information Processing. ICONIP 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11307. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04239-4_45

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04239-4_45

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04238-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04239-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics