Skip to main content

Affectional Ontology and Multimedia Dataset for Sentiment Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Smart Multimedia (ICSM 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11010))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Ontology is able to understand the association between concepts and the relationships within contents. We argue that, ontology could compete with machine learning in detecting sentiments contained in textual messages. Current ontology-based sentiment models are domain specific, which limits their ability to adapt to different domains. In this work, we propose a general sentiment ontology (Affectional Ontology) using various sentiment lexicons and psychological-based resources. To provide an efficient evaluation on the Affectional Ontology, we propose a domain-free sentiment multimedia dataset (DFSMD). Our DFSMD was constructed with high standard annotation criteria. The results of our work show the effectiveness of the proposed ontology in capturing the sentiment, when compared to the machine learning approach. The proposed DFSMD is publicly available and can be used in various sentiment analysis problems without the restrictions of particular domains or aspects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.sananalytics.com/lab.

  2. 2.

    www.dialogueearth.org.

  3. 3.

    http://www.mcrlab.net/datasets/dfsmd/.

  4. 4.

    https://wordnet.princeton.edu/.

  5. 5.

    http://wndomains.fbk.eu/wnaffect.html.

  6. 6.

    http://saifmohammad.com/WebPages/NRC-Emotion-Lexicon.htm.

  7. 7.

    http://sentic.net/.

  8. 8.

    https://www.gelbukh.com/emosenticnet/.

  9. 9.

    http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/~inquirer/.

  10. 10.

    http://mpqa.cs.pitt.edu/lexicons/subj_lexicon/.

  11. 11.

    http://www2.imm.dtu.dk/pubdb/views/publication_details.php?id=6010.

  12. 12.

    http://sentistrength.wlv.ac.uk/.

  13. 13.

    https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/.

  14. 14.

    http://protege.stanford.edu/.

  15. 15.

    https://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/Pellet.

  16. 16.

    http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/.

  17. 17.

    http://kt.ijs.si/data/Emoji_sentiment_ranking/.

  18. 18.

    https://emojipedia.org/.

References

  1. Abaalkhail, R., Guthier, B., Alharthi, R., El Saddik, A.: Survey on ontologies for affective states and their influences. Semant. Web, 1–18 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-170270

  2. Alharthi, R., Guthier, B., Guertin, C., El Saddik, A.: A dataset for psychological human needs detection from social networks. IEEE Access 5, 9109–9117 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2706084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jurafsky, D., Martin, J.H., Lexicons for sentiment and affect extraction. In: Speech and Language Processing, pp. 326–344. Pearson London (2014). https://doi.org/10.1162/089120100750105975

  4. Cowie, R., Douglas-Cowie, E., Apolloni, B., Taylor, J., Romano, A., Fellenz, W., et al.: What a neural net needs to know about emotion words. Comput. Intell. Appl. 404, 5311–5316 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Davidov, D., Tsur, O., Rappoport, A.: Enhanced sentiment learning using Twitter hashtags and smileys. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Posters, pp. 241–249. Association for Computational Linguistics (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Frijda, N.H.: The Emotions. Cambridge University Press (1986). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316275221

  7. Fujita, F., Diener, E., Sandvik, E.: Gender differences in negative affect and well-being: the case for emotional intensity. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 61(3), 427 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Go, A., Bhayani, R., Huang, : L.: Twitter sentiment classification using distant supervision. CS224N Project Report, Stanford, vol. 1, no. 2009, p. 12 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hogenboom, A., Bal, D., Frasincar, F., Bal, M., De Jong, F., Kaymak, U.: Exploiting emoticons in polarity classification of text. J. Web Eng. 14(1–2), 22–40 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hogenboom, A., Bal, D., Frasincar, F., Bal, M., de Jong, F., Kaymak, U.: Exploiting emoticons in sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 703–710. ACM (2013). https://doi.org/10.1145/2480362.2480498

  11. Hovy, E.H.: What are sentiment, affect, and emotion? Applying the methodology of michael Zock to sentiment analysis. In: Gala, N., Rapp, R., Bel-Enguix, G. (eds.) Language Production, Cognition, and the Lexicon. TSLT, vol. 48, pp. 13–24. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08043-7_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Kiritchenko, S., Zhu, X., Mohammad, S.M.: Sentiment analysis of short informal texts. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 50, 723–762 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.4272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hu, M., Liu, B.: Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In: Proceedings of the Tenth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD 2004, pp. 168–177. ACM, New York (2004).https://doi.org/10.1145/1014052.1014073

  14. Kontopoulos, E., Berberidis, C., Dergiades, T., Bassiliades, N.: Ontology-based sentiment analysis of Twitter posts. Expert Syst. Appl. 40(10), 4065–4074 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mohammad, S.M., Turney, P.D.: Crowdsourcing a word-emotion association lexicon. Comput. Intell. 29(3), 436–465 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8640.2012.00460.x

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Nithish, R., Sabarish, S., Kishen, M.N., Abirami, A., Askarunisa, A.: An ontology based sentiment analysis for mobile products using tweets. In: 2013 Fifth International Conference on Advanced Computing (ICoAC), pp. 342–347. IEEE (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICoAC.2013.6921974

  17. Novak, P.K., Smailović, J., Sluban, B., Mozetič, I.: Sentiment of emojis. PloS One 10(12), e0144296 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pak, A., Paroubek, P.: Twitter as a corpus for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In: LREc, vol. 10 (2010). https://doi.org/10.17148/ijarcce.2016.51274

  19. Parrott, W.G.: Emotions in Social Psychology: Essential Readings. Psychology Press, Hove (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ravi, K., Ravi, V.: A survey on opinion mining and sentiment analysis: tasks, approaches and applications. Knowl.-Based Syst. 89, 14–46 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2015.06.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rosenthal, S., Farra, N., Nakov, P.: Semeval-2017 task 4: sentiment analysis in Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2017), pp. 502–518 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sam, K.M., Chatwin, C.: Ontology-based sentiment analysis model of customer reviews for electronic products. In: Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, 3rd edn, pp. 892–904. IGI Global (2015). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-5888-2.ch085

  23. Snow, R., O’Connor, B., Jurafsky, D., Ng, A.Y.: Cheap and fast—but is itgood?: evaluating non-expert annotations for natural language tasks. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 254–263. Association for Computational Linguistics (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Speriosu, M., Sudan, N., Upadhyay, S., Baldridge, J.: Twitter polarity classification with label propagation over lexical links and the follower graph. In: Proceedings of the First Workshop on Unsupervised Learning in NLP, pp. 53–63. Association for Computational Linguistics (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Strapparava, C., Valitutti, A., et al.: Wordnet affect: an affective extension of wordnet. In: LREC, vol. 4, pp. 1083–1086 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sykora, M.D., Jackson, T., O’Brien, A., Elayan, S.: Emotive ontology: extracting fine-grained emotions from terse, informal messages (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wierzbicka, A.: Emotions Across Languages and Cultures: Diversity and Universals. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511521256

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Fatimah Alzamzami , Samah Aloufi , Rajwa Alharthi or Abdulmotaleb El Saddik .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Abaalkhail, R., Alzamzami, F., Aloufi, S., Alharthi, R., Saddik, A.E. (2018). Affectional Ontology and Multimedia Dataset for Sentiment Analysis. In: Basu, A., Berretti, S. (eds) Smart Multimedia. ICSM 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11010. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04375-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04375-9_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04374-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04375-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics