Skip to main content

Smart Crowdsourcing Based Content Review System (SCCRS): An Approach to Improve Trustworthiness of Online Contents

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Data and Social Networks (CSoNet 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 11280))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Online media is now a significant carrier for quicker and ubiquitous diffusion of information. Any user in social media can post contents, provide news blogs, and engage in debate or opinion nowadays. Most of the posted pieces of information on social media are useful while some are fallacious and insulting to others. Keeping the promise of freedom of speech and simultaneously no tolerance against hate speech often becomes a challenge for the hosting services. Some automated tools were developed for content filtering in industries. Also, companies are hiring specialized reviewers for accurate and unbiased reporting. However, these approaches are not achieving the goal as expected, on the other hand, new strategies are being adopted to tweak the automated systems. To face the situation, we proposed a smart crowdsourcing based content review technique to provide trustworthy and unbiased reviews for online shared contents. In this techniques, we designed an intelligent self-learned crowdsourcing strategy to select an appropriate set of reviewers efficiently which ensures reviewers’ diversity, availability, quality, and familiarity with the news topic. To evaluate our proposed method, we developed a mobile app similar to popular social media (e.g., Facebook).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Leonhardt, D., Thompson, S.A.: Trump’s lies. New York Times, June 2017. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/06/23/opinion/trumps-lies.html. Accessed 30 Sept 2018

  2. Carlos, M.: Millonario negocio fake news. Univision Noticias (2017). https://www.univision.com/noticias/america-latina/el-millonario-negocio-detras-de-los-sitios-de-fake-news-en-mexico. Accessed 30 Sept 2018

  3. Hunt, E.: What is fake news? How to spot it and what you can do to stop it. The Guardian, January 2017. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/dec/18/what-is-fake-news-pizzagate. Accessed 30 Sept 2018

  4. Woolf, N.: How to solve Facebook’s fake news problem: experts pitch their ideas. The Guardian, January 2017. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/nov/29/facebook-fake-news-problem-experts-pitch-ideas-algorithms. Accessed 30 Sept 2018

  5. Shane, S.: From headline to photograph, a fake news masterpiece. New York Times, May 2016. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/18/us/fake-news-hillary-clinton-cameron-harris.html. Accessed 30 Sept 2018

  6. Gottfried, J., Shearer, E: News use across social media platforms. Pew Research Center Journalism & Media, January 2016. http://www.journalism.org/2016/05/26/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2016/. Accessed 30 Sept 2018

  7. Silverman, C., Strapagiel, L., Shaban, H., Hall, E.: Hyperpartisan Facebook pages are publishing false and misleading information at an alarming rate. Buzzfeed (2016). https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/craigsilverman/partisan-fb-pages-analysis. Accessed 30 Sept 2018

  8. Craig, S.: Viral fake election news outperformed real news on Facebook? Buzzfeed (2016). https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/craigsilverman/viral-fake-election-news-outperformed-real-news-on-facebook. Accessed 30 Sept 2018

  9. Allcott, H., Gentzkow, M.: Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. National Bureau of Economic Research (2017). https://www.nber.org/papers/w23089. Accessed 30 Sept 2018

  10. Goldman, R.: Reading fake news, Pakistani minister directs nuclear threat at Israel. New York Times (2016). https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/24/world/asia/pakistan-israel-khawaja-asif-fake-news-nuclear.html. Accessed 30 Sept 2018

  11. Melissa, K.: Fake-photos-hurricane-sandy. Yahoo News (2012). https://www.yahoo.com/news/blogs/trending-now/fake-photos-hurricane-sandy-flood-social-media-190021894.html. Accessed 30 Sept 2018

  12. Guardian: Fake-photos-hurricane-sandy. Guardian (2012). https://www.theguardian.com/world/us-news-blog/2012/oct/30/hurricane-sandy-storm-new-york. Accessed 30 Sept 2018

  13. Gomes, L.H., Cazita, C., Almeida, J.M., Almeida, V., Meira, W.: Workload models of spam and legitimate e-mails. Perform. Eval. 64, 690–714 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fetterly, D., Manasse, M., Najork, M.: Spam, damn spam, and statistics: using statistical analysis to locate spam web pages. In: 7th International Workshop on the Web and Databases: Colocated with ACM SIGMOD/PODS 2004, pp. 1–6 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Thomason, A.: Blog spam: a review. In: Conference on Email and Anti-Spam (CEAS), pp. 1–4 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wu, C.T., Cheng, K.T., Zhu, Q., Wu, Y.L: Using visual features for anti-spam filtering. In: IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 2005, vol. 3, pp. III–509 (2005). http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.88.4031&rep=rep1&type=pdf

  17. Gupta, A., Lamba, H., Kumaraguru, P., Joshi, A.: Faking sandy: characterizing and identifying fake images on Twitter during hurricane sandy. In: 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 729–736 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Corvey, W.J., Verma, S., Vieweg, S., Palmer, M., Martin, J.H.: Foundations of a multilayer annotation framework for Twitter communications during crisis events. In: 8th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, pp. 1–5 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Castillo, C., Mendoza, M., Poblete, B.: Information credibility on Twitter. In: 20th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 675–684 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Canini, K.R., Suh, B., Pirolli, P.L.: Finding credible information sources in social networks based on content and social structure. In: IEEE Third International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust, pp. 1–8 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gupta, A., Kumaraguru, P.: Credibility ranking of tweets during high impact events. In: 1st Workshop on Privacy and Security in Online Social Media, pp. 2:2–2:8 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. O’Donovan, J., Kang, B., Meyer, G., Hllerer, T., Adalii, S.: Credibility in context: an analysis of feature distributions in Twitter. In: 2012 International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust, pp. 293–301 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Eaton-Robb, P.: College students come with plug combat fake news (2017). https://www.businessinsider.com/ap-college-students-come-up-with-plug-in-to-combat-fake-news-2017-12. Accessed 30 Sept 2018

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kishor Datta Gupta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gupta, K.D., Dasgupta, D., Sen, S. (2018). Smart Crowdsourcing Based Content Review System (SCCRS): An Approach to Improve Trustworthiness of Online Contents. In: Chen, X., Sen, A., Li, W., Thai, M. (eds) Computational Data and Social Networks. CSoNet 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11280. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04648-4_44

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04648-4_44

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04647-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04648-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics