Skip to main content

Short-Cut Rules

Sequential Composition of Rules Avoiding Unnecessary Deletions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 11176))

Abstract

Sequences of rule applications in high-level replacement systems are difficult to adapt. Often, replacing a rule application at the beginning of a sequence, i.e., reverting a rule and applying another one instead, is prevented by structure created via rule applications later on in the sequence. A trivial solution would be to roll back all applications and reapply them in a proper way. This, however, has the disadvantage of being computationally expensive and, furthermore, may cause the loss of information in the process. Moreover, using existing constructions to compose the reversal of a rule with the application of another one, in particular the concurrent and amalgamated rule constructions, does not prevent the loss of information in case that the first rule deletes elements being recreated by the second one. To cope with both problems, we introduce a new kind of rule composition through ‘short-cut rules’. We present our new kind of rule composition for monotonic rules in adhesive HLR systems, as they provide a well-established generalization of graph-based transformation systems, and motivate it on the example of Triple Graph Grammars, a declarative and rule-based bidirectional transformation approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Boehm, P., Fonio, H.R., Habel, A.: Amalgamation of graph transformations. A synchronization mechanism. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 34(2), 377–408 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0000(87)90030-4

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Ehrig, H., Ehrig, K., Prange, U., Taentzer, G.: Fundamentals of Algebraic Graph Transformation. Monographs in Theoretical Computer Science. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31188-2

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Ehrig, H., Golas, U., Habel, A., Lambers, L., Orejas, F.: \(\cal{M}\)-adhesive transformation systems with nested application conditions. Part 1: parallelism, concurrency and amalgamation. Math. Struct. Comput. Sci. 24(4), 240406 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960129512000357

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Fritsche, L., Kosiol, J., Schürr, A., Taentzer, G.: Short-cut rules. Sequential composition of rules avoiding unnecessary deletions: extended version. Technical report, Philipps-Universität Marburg (2018). https://www.uni-marburg.de/fb12/arbeitsgruppen/swt/forschung/publikationen/2018/FKST18-TR.pdf

  5. Habel, A., Pennemann, K.H.: Correctness of high-level transformation systems relative to nested conditions. Math. Struct. Comput. Sci. 19(2), 245–296 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960129508007202

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Lack, S., Sobociński, P.: Adhesive and quasiadhesive categories. Theor. Inf. Appl. 39(3), 511–545 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1051/ita:2005028

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Leblebici, E., Anjorin, A., Fritsche, L., Varró, G., Schürr, A.: Leveraging incremental pattern matching techniques for model synchronisation. In: de Lara, J., Plump, D. (eds.) ICGT 2017. LNCS, vol. 10373, pp. 179–195. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61470-0_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Leblebici, E., Anjorin, A., Schürr, A., Taentzer, G.: Multi-amalgamated triple graph grammars: formal foundation and application to visual language translation. J. Vis. Lang. Comput. 42, 99–121 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvlc.2016.03.001

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Leblebici, E., Anjorin, A., Schürr, A.: Inter-model consistency checking using triple graph grammars and linear optimization techniques. In: Huisman, M., Rubin, J. (eds.) FASE 2017. LNCS, vol. 10202, pp. 191–207. Springer, Heidelberg (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54494-5_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Schürr, A.: Specification of graph translators with triple graph grammars. In: Mayr, E.W., Schmidt, G., Tinhofer, G. (eds.) WG 1994. LNCS, vol. 903, pp. 151–163. Springer, Heidelberg (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-59071-4_45

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partially funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG), project “Triple Graph Grammars (TGG) 2.0”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lars Fritsche or Jens Kosiol .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Fritsche, L., Kosiol, J., Schürr, A., Taentzer, G. (2018). Short-Cut Rules. In: Mazzara, M., Ober, I., Salaün, G. (eds) Software Technologies: Applications and Foundations. STAF 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11176. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04771-9_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04771-9_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04770-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04771-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics