Skip to main content

Generating Win-Win Strategies for Software Businesses Under Coopetition: A Strategic Modeling Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 336))

Abstract

Interorganizational coopetition describes a phenomenon in which businesses cooperate and compete simultaneously. Such behavior is commonplace among software firms wherein vendors concomitantly deal with each other both as partners and as rivals. Sustainable coopetitive relationships are predicated on the logic of win-win strategies. Conversely, win-lose or lose-lose strategies do not lead to durable coopetitive relationships. This aspect of coopetition requires decision-makers in coopeting software businesses to generate and analyze win-win strategies. This paper proposes a strategic modeling approach to systematically search for alternatives and generate win-win strategies. This approach synergistically combines i* goal-modeling to analyze the distributed intentional structures of actors and Game Tree decision-modeling to reason about the moves and countermoves of actors. An illustrative example of a published case study is presented to demonstrate the strengths and weaknesses of this methodology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chesbrough, H.: Open innovation: a new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation. In: Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, pp. 0–19, 400 p. (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jansen, S., Finkelstein, A., Brinkkemper, S.: A sense of community: a research agenda for software ecosystems. In: 31st International Conference on Software Engineering Companion Volume, pp. 187–190. IEEE, May 2009

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brandenburger, A.M., Nalebuff, B.J.: Co-opetition. Doubleday, New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Duc, A.N., Cruzes, D.S., Hanssen, G.K., Snarby, T., Abrahamsson, P.: Coopetition of software firms in open source software ecosystems. In: Ojala, A., Holmström Olsson, H., Werder, K. (eds.) ICSOB 2017. LNBIP, vol. 304, pp. 146–160. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69191-6_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Coutinho, E.F., Viana, D., dos Santos, R.P.: An exploratory study on the need for modeling software ecosystems: the case of SOLAR SECO. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Modelling in Software Engineering, pp. 47–53. IEEE Press, May 2017

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rausch, A., Bartelt, C., Herold, S., Klus, H., Niebuhr, D.: From software systems to complex software ecosystems: model- and constraint-based engineering of ecosystems. In: Münch, J., Schmid, K. (eds.) Perspectives on the Future of Software Engineering, pp. 61–80. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37395-4_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Boucharas, V., Jansen, S., Brinkkemper, S.: Formalizing software ecosystem modeling. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Open Component Ecosystems, pp. 41–50. ACM, August 2009

    Google Scholar 

  8. Handoyo, E., Jansen, S., Brinkkemper, S.: Software ecosystem modeling: the value chains. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Management of Emergent Digital Ecosystems, pp. 17–24. ACM, October 2013

    Google Scholar 

  9. Handoyo, E.: Software ecosystem modeling. In: Herzwurm, G., Margaria, T. (eds.) ICSOB 2013. LNBIP, vol. 150, pp. 227–228. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39336-5_25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Alves, A.M., Pessoa, M., Salviano, C.F.: Towards a systemic maturity model for public software ecosystems. In: O’Connor, R.V., Rout, T., McCaffery, F., Dorling, A. (eds.) SPICE 2011. CCIS, vol. 155, pp. 145–156. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21233-8_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Yu, E., Deng, S.: Understanding software ecosystems: a strategic modeling approach. In: Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Software Ecosystems, Brussels, Belgium, pp. 65–76, June 2011

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pant, V., Yu, E.: Understanding strategic moves and reciprocity on software ecosystems: a strategic modeling approach. In: 9th International Workshop on Software Ecosystems (IWSECO 2017) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Padula, G., Dagnino, G.B.: Untangling the rise of coopetition: the intrusion of competition in a cooperative game structure. Int. Stud. Manag. Organ. 37(2), 32–52 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brandenburger, A.M., Nalebuff, B.J.: The Right Game: Use Game Theory to Shape Strategy. Harvard Business Review, pp. 57–71 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dixit, A.K., Nalebuff, B.: The Art of Strategy: A Game Theorist’s Guide to Success in Business & Life. WW Norton & Company, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Magdon-Ismail, M., Busch, C., Krishnamoorthy, M.S.: Cake-cutting is not a piece of cake. In: Alt, H., Habib, M. (eds.) STACS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2607, pp. 596–607. Springer, Heidelberg (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36494-3_52

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Barbanel, J.B., Brams, S.J., Stromquist, W.: Cutting a pie is not a piece of cake. Am. Math. Mon. 116(6), 496–514 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen, Y., Lai, J.K., Parkes, D.C., Procaccia, A.D.: Truth, justice, and cake cutting. Games Econ. Behav. 77(1), 284–297 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Deng, X., Qi, Q., Saberi, A.: Algorithmic solutions for envy-free cake cutting. Oper. Res. 60(6), 1461–1476 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Aziz, H., Mackenzie, S.: A discrete and bounded envy-free cake cutting protocol for any number of agents. In: 57th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 416–427. IEEE, October 2016

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dall’Aglio, M., Hill, T.P.: Maximin share and minimax envy in fair-division problems. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 281(1), 346–361 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Yu, E., Giorgini, P., Maiden, N., Mylopoulos, J.: Social Modeling for Requirements Engineering. MIT Press, Cambridge (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ghazawneh, A., Henfridsson, O.: Governing third-party development through platform boundary resources. In: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference of Information Systems (ICIS), St. Louis (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ghazawneh, A., Henfridsson, O.: Micro-strategizing in platform ecosystems: a multiple case study. In: Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS) 2011, Shanghai, China (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Eaton, B., Elaluf-Calderwood, S., Sorensen, C., Yoo, Y.: Distributed tuning of boundary resources: the case of Apple’s iOS service system. MIS Q.: Manag. Inf. Syst. 39(1), 217–243 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Prince, J.D.: HTML5: not just a substitute for flash. J. Electron. Resour. Med. Libr. 10(2), 108–112 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Elaluf-Calderwood, S.M., Eaton, B.D., Sørensen, C., Yoo, Y.: Control as a strategy for the development of generativity in business models for mobile platforms. In: 15th International Conference on Intelligence in Next Generation Networks (ICIN), pp. 271–276. IEEE, October 2011

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nalebuff, B.J., Brandenburger, A.M.: Co-opetition: competitive and cooperative business strategies for the digital economy. Strategy Leadersh. 25(6), 28–33 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Brandenburger, A.M., Stuart, H.W.: Value-based business strategy. J. Econ. Manag. Strategy 5(1), 5–24 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Brandenburger, A., Stuart, H.: Biform games. Manage. Sci. 53(4), 537–549 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Fricker, S.: Specification and analysis of requirements negotiation strategy in software ecosystems. In: Proceedings of International Workshop on Software Ecosystems (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Jansen, S., Handoyo, E., Alves, C.: Scientists’ needs in software ecosystem modeling. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Software Ecosystems (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Santos, G.A.V.: A theory of power in software ecosystems formed by small-to-medium enterprises. Ph.D. thesis (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Boudreau, K.J.: Let a thousand flowers bloom? An early look at large numbers of software app developers and patterns of innovation. Organ. Sci. 23(5), 1409–1427 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Koller, D., Megiddo, N.: The complexity of two-person zero-sum games in extensive form. Games Econ. Behav. 4(4), 528–552 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vik Pant .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pant, V., Yu, E. (2018). Generating Win-Win Strategies for Software Businesses Under Coopetition: A Strategic Modeling Approach. In: Wnuk, K., Brinkkemper, S. (eds) Software Business. ICSOB 2018. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 336. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04840-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04840-2_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04839-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04840-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics