Skip to main content

Situation-Dependent Data Quality Analysis for Geospatial Data Using Semantic Technologies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 339))

Abstract

In this paper we present a new way to evaluate geospatial data quality using Semantic technologies. In contrast to non-semantic approaches to evaluate data quality, Semantic technologies allow us to model situations in which geospatial data may be used and to apply costumized geospatial data quality models using reasoning algorithms on a broad scale. We explain how to model data quality using common vocabularies of ontologies in various contexts, apply data quality results using reasoning in a real-world application case using OpenStreetMap as our data source and highlight the results of our findings on the example of disaster management planning for rescue forces. We contribute to the Semantic Web community and the OpenStreetMap community by proposing a semantic framework to combine usecase dependent data quality assignments which can be used as reasoning rules and as data quality assurance tools for both communities respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Auer, S., Bizer, C., Kobilarov, G., Lehmann, J., Cyganiak, R., Ives, Z.: DBpedia: a nucleus for a web of open data. In: Aberer, K., et al. (eds.) ASWC/ISWC -2007. LNCS, vol. 4825, pp. 722–735. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76298-0_52

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Auer, S., Lehmann, J., Hellmann, S.: LinkedGeoData: adding a spatial dimension to the web of data. In: Bernstein, A., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5823, pp. 731–746. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04930-9_46

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Barron, C., Neis, P., Zipf, A.: A comprehensive framework for intrinsic openstreetmap quality analysis. Trans. GIS 18(6), 877–895 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Battle, R., Kolas, D.: Enabling the geospatial semantic web with parliament and geosparql. Semant. Web 3(4), 355–370 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Belhajjame, K., et al.: PROV-O: the PROV ontology. W3C Working Draft (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O., et al.: The semantic web. Sci. Am. 284(5), 28–37 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chaudhuri, G., Clarke, K.C.: Temporal accuracy in urban growth forecasting: a study using the SLEUTH model. Trans. GIS 18(2), 302–320 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Das, S., Sundara, S., Cyganiak, R.: R2RML: RDB tO RDF mapping language. w3c recommendation, 27 September 2012. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Cambridge (2012). www.w3.org/TR/r2rml

  9. Debattista, J., Lange, C., Auer, S.: daQ, an ontology for dataset quality information. In: LDOW (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Drummond, J.: Positional accuracy. In: Elements of Spatial Data Quality, pp. 31–58. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1995)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Fan, H., Zipf, A., Fu, Q., Neis, P.: Quality assessment for building footprints data on openstreetmap. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 28(4), 700–719 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Goodchild, M.F.: Attribute accuracy. In: Elements of Spatial Data Quality, pp. 59–79. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1995)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Haklay, M., Weber, P.: Openstreetmap: user-generated street maps. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 7(4), 12–18 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hecht, R., Kunze, C., Hahmann, S.: Measuring completeness of building footprints in openstreetmap over space and time. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2(4), 1066–1091 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hodgson, R., Keller, P.J.: QUDT-quantities, units, dimensions and data types in OWL and XML (2011). http://www.qudt.org

  16. Homburg, T., Boochs, F., Roxin, A., Cruz, C.: Map change prediction for quality assurance. In: The 14th Conference on Location Based Services. ETH Zurich (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Homburg, T., et al.: Interpreting heterogeneous geospatial data using semantic web technologies. In: Gervasi, O., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2016. LNCS, vol. 9788, pp. 240–255. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42111-7_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Data quality - Part 8: Information and data quality: Concepts and measuring. Standard, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, CH, November 2015

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kainz, W.: Logical consistency. In: Elements of Spatial Data Quality, pp. 109–137, 202. Elseiver, Amsterdam (1995)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Koubarakis, M., Bereta, K., Papadakis, G., Savva, D., Stamoulis, G.: Big, linked geospatial data and its applications in earth observation. IEEE Internet Comput. 4, 87–91 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mooney, P., Corcoran, P., Winstanley, A.C.: Towards quality metrics for openstreetmap. In: Proceedings of the 18th SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, pp. 514–517. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Neis, P., Zipf, A.: Analyzing the contributor activity of a volunteered geographic information project–the case of openstreetmap. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 1(2), 146–165 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Palen, L., Soden, R., Anderson, T.J., Barrenechea, M.: Success & scale in a data-producing organization: the socio-technical evolution of openstreetmap in response to humanitarian events. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 4113–4122. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Prud, E., Seaborne, A., et al.: SPARQL query language for RDF (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Prudhomme, C., Homburg, T., Jean-Jacques, P., Boochs, F., Roxin, A., Cruz, C.: Automatic integration of spatial data into the semantic web. In: WebIST 2017 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Salgé, F.: Semantic accuracy. In: Elements of Spatial Data Quality, pp. 139–151. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1995)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Volz, J., Bizer, C., Gaedke, M., Kobilarov, G.: Silk-a link discovery framework for the web of data. In: LDOW, vol. 538 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Vrandečić, D., Krötzsch, M.: Wikidata: a free collaborative knowledgebase. Commun. ACM 57(10), 78–85 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang, R.Y., Strong, D.M.: Beyond accuracy: what data quality means to data consumers. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 12(4), 5–33 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Würriehausen, F., Homburg, T., Müller, H.: Using an inspire ontology to support spatial data interoperability. In: INSPIRE 2016, Barcelona, Spain, September 2016

    Google Scholar 

  31. Yue, P., He, L.: Geospatial data provenance in cyberinfrastructure. In: 2009 17th International Conference on Geoinformatics, pp. 1–4. IEEE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research under project reference number 03FH032IX4.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timo Homburg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Homburg, T., Boochs, F. (2019). Situation-Dependent Data Quality Analysis for Geospatial Data Using Semantic Technologies. In: Abramowicz, W., Paschke, A. (eds) Business Information Systems Workshops. BIS 2018. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 339. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04849-5_49

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04849-5_49

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04848-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04849-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics